Butch Jackson came in steaming as if he had blown one major gasket, and as it turned out, he had (and for good reason). "That flop eared, skinny, liar has really done it this time. Surely the American people will wake up, and by wake up I mean after today's news he shouldn't have more than the Commie vote which couldn't be more than 15-20% of this country (I am ashamed to say it is that high)."
Obviously it was time for Billy Roy to intervene before this got out of hand, "Whoa there, partner. I scanned the Waco Times Herald and must have missed something. What is going on?"
"Did you see where Floppy awarded 13 Medal of Freedom awards yesterday? The paper says he got real personal in saying 'I know how all 13 impacted my life'. He listened to Bob Dylan in college (probably while in a drug daze) and, 'my world opened up'. Then the big one, 'Obama recalled reading about union trailblazer Dolores Huerta, who co-founded the National Farm Workers with Cesar Chavez, when he WAS STARTING OUT AS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER.' He went on to say 'everybody on this stage has marked my life in profound ways'. This Medal of Freedom is presented to people who have made meritorious contributions to the national interests of the United States, to world peace, or to other significant endeavors. So what did this Dolores lady do? Let's look at who she is."
"This 82 year old is the honorary chair of the Democratic Socialists of America. I am not making this up. I am going to read this right off their web site.
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few.
Today, corporate executives who answer only to themselves and a few wealthy stockholders make basic economic decisions affecting millions of people. Resources are used to make money for capitalists rather than to meet human needs. We believe that the workers and consumers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them.
Social ownership could take many forms, such as worker-owned cooperatives or publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives. While the large concentrations of capital in industries such as energy and steel may necessitate some form of state ownership, many consumer-goods industries might be best run as cooperatives.
In the short term we can’t eliminate private corporations, but we can bring them under greater democratic control. The government could use regulations and tax incentives to encourage companies to act in the public interest and outlaw destructive activities such as exporting jobs to low-wage countries and polluting our environment. Most of all, socialists look to unions make private business more accountable.
Question: Are you a separate party from the Democrats? No, we are not a separate party. Like our friends and allies in the feminist, labor, civil rights, religious, and community organizing movements, many of us have been active in the Democratic Party. We work with those movements to strengthen the party’s left wing, represented by the Congressional Progressive Caucus. For now, we will continue to support progressives who have a real chance at winning elections, which usually means left-wing Democrats.
"Butch, once again you have done some really good spade work here," the Chairman gave a rare compliment. "While the press is focused on whether Governor Romney's private equity efforts were to create jobs or to make rich investors richer Obama has once again told us in no uncertain terms just who he is, a Socialist Colonialist. His mission in life is to realize his father's dream of transforming the world's HAVES into HAVE NOTS.
A vote for Obama is very simply a vote for:
1. Crippling our economy by placing higher taxes on producers
2. More government regulation and control of all facets of our lives
3. Redistributing wealth from producers to moochers
A vote for Romney is a vote for:
1. Business incentives including lower taxes to encourage investment and growth in our economy
2. Less regulations and more dependence on time proven free economic principles
3. The creation of jobs and wealth that are fundamental by-products of a growing economy
To net it out the race is between those who believe that capitalism has created the greatest and most successful nation in history and those who believe in higher taxes, more government regulation of the economy, and the distribution of wealth.
It is amazing with Socialist Europe on its knees, with Communism collapsing around the world, and with even the Chinese moving to capitalism and free markets that the United States of America is considering re-elect an incompetent Socialist to be the leader of the free world. It is not like we don't know who he is anymore. It is not like we don't have 3 1/2 years of evidence of his lies and betrayals. It is not like our nation isn't on the brink of bankruptcy with $15 trillion of debt. It is not like Obama isn't adding over $1 trillion each year to our debt while looking the country right in the eye and lying that he has increased spending less than any President in the last 60 years," Billy Roy closed.
I encourage each of you to listen to Ms. Huerta's own words as she praises Caesare Chavez while proclaiming that Republicans hate latinos. Go to this link and click on the second picture in the middle of the article that says WE CAN HELP. Hear Obama's idol in her own words.
http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/29/obama-awards-medal-of-freedom-to-democratic-socialists-of-america-chair/
Think about it,
Jim
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Friday, May 25, 2012
And She Called Me A Racist!
Interesting dinner last week with friends. Politics, the forbidden dinner topic, reared its head and drifted to welfare and government programs. I made the statement that we really need to address our "Black Problem". A good friend of mine, who is also a former New York resident and liberal, corrected me. She said, "You mean we have a problem with the disadvantaged." I repeated, "We have a black problem," She then called me a Racist. I chalked this up as one more intelligent exchange between a Conservative and Liberal.
Let's talk about this.
In today's Austin American Statesman, not known for its Conservative positions, Ken Herman (not known for his conservative positions as well), writes "Central Texas African American community produces too many children that wind up in foster care and too few black volunteers to help these children." He cites 68% of African American children in Travis Country are born out of wedlock and only 17% of whites (which is still too many whites!). Herman says too many blacks drop out of school, too many wind up in prison, and too many failed government programs exist. Herman speaks of the "evolving redefinition of marriage". Herman then makes an impassioned and constructive plea for more blacks to volunteer as special advocates for abused and neglected children through an organization named CASA. Only 6% of the current volunteers are black.
In the same newspaper there is a long article about food stamp fraud. It seems that of all agencies our Agriculture Department is out of control with a runaway food stamp program. Recipients can sell their food stamp cards for cash and request a replacement. Stores are forbidden to request identification to verify ownership. Also, many card owners get cash from crooked retail store operators to buy alcohol and drugs. So what is the Ag Department's remedy? They will now allow states to "question" card holders who lose more than three cards in a calender year". Also, this crack federal agency has requested that Facebook, Twitter, Ebay,and Craigslist not allow the buying and selling of food stamp cards on the Internet. WOW! If the Ag guys are not careful they may take action that could reduce their bulging federal budgets. God forbid! Their answer on why they tread so carefully in controlling the system, "many of our people are homeless or have dementia or mental illness." So the federal government's solution to the homeless and the mentally ill is to allow food stamp trafficking to funnel cash and drugs to recipients?
In the same edition of this newspaper (I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP) the director of advocacy for the Capital (that be Austin) Area Food Bank authored a huge article entitled, "Combat hunger and you'll combat other health issues". Her article was just loaded with facts. I have wondered personally how we can fight world hunger and obesity among the poor all at the same time. She really cleared it up for slow people like me. Ms. Green starts with the fact, "that 1 of every 6 Americans struggle with hunger". She continues, "as hunger is often a symptom of poverty, those cannot purchase nutritious food." She says, "surprisingly, some hungry people are also overweight. This occurs when access to fresh, nutritious food is difficult and expensive." WOW, WOW, AND A DOUBLE WOW! Thank goodness for Michelle Obama and her White House garden! And then Ms. Green really takes it home with more statistics, "According to the Center of Disease Prevention more than 1 in 3 adults and 17% of children are OBESE." And now Ms. Green's solution, "Programs such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps) need to give more hungry people more purchasing power to buy food." Can you believe the name of the food stamp program? By putting more money into the program we turned hunger into obesity. If we can just put more money in we can all buy veggies from someone like Michelle and live happily ever after. What a great country we live in!
Just looking at "the facts". We are basically told that about 45% of Americans are fat and hungry, and we just need a few more programs from the federal government and more money of rich tax payers. Making poor people obese just isn't fair.
So what is the big problem here? It is the old producer and moocher thing. There are too many government programs providing incentives for moochers to take from the producers. The programs are for food stamps, welfare payments, tax rebates for non-tax payers, extended unemployment and fake disability claims, student loans, incentives for single parents, marriage tax penalties, public housing, etc., etc. It is clear that Obama wants to drive organizations like the Catholic Church out of the assistance business whether it be hospitals, schools, or charities for the poor. HHS recently said religious organisations must provide early abortion support to their employees resulting in laws suits this week. Obama wants his voting base to look to HIM, not their church or community for assistance and a safety net.
Why pick on blacks who certainly aren't all problems nor do they represent all of our nation's problems. Because there are too many blacks mooching and not enough producing. Some blacks believe they are entitled to mooch off white tax payers because their ancestors were mistreated. There are black pimps who work to keep blacks down and under their influence and control. Obama is a black pimp. He has done nothing to help blacks WORK their way out of poverty. I repeat, WORK, WORK, WORK. This mixed race President who claims to be African American stirs up division between blacks and whites in an attempt to cement his voting block needing over 95% of the black vote for re-election. When blacks were recently interviewed while standing in a welfare line they said they were there to receive their "Obama Juice". Obama isn't alone. There are entire industries and many government agencies working to create a downtrodden black culture from which they can benefit.
Even public educators fight for the status quo which in many black neighborhoods means inferior education. Obama was quick to support stopping funding for Charter Schools in Washington DC once elected. Started in 2004, the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship provided vouchers of up to $7,500 to low-income, mostly minority children for private-school tuition. Democrats never liked the program and -- egged on by the teachers unions -- made the program's demise a top priority. Congress moved to cut off funding, and the Obama administration went right along. Despite the fact Obama's two daughters attend the elite Sidwell Friends School because he knew they would get a far better education there than in the struggling D.C. public schools.
The sad part of this story is, as always, the ones who are hurt the most are the moochers themselves. Shame on us. We were on the right track back when Clinton ran to the middle and passed welfare reform with the Republican Congress. A small step, but in the right direction. And that was a long, long time ago.
Think about it,
Jim
Let's talk about this.
In today's Austin American Statesman, not known for its Conservative positions, Ken Herman (not known for his conservative positions as well), writes "Central Texas African American community produces too many children that wind up in foster care and too few black volunteers to help these children." He cites 68% of African American children in Travis Country are born out of wedlock and only 17% of whites (which is still too many whites!). Herman says too many blacks drop out of school, too many wind up in prison, and too many failed government programs exist. Herman speaks of the "evolving redefinition of marriage". Herman then makes an impassioned and constructive plea for more blacks to volunteer as special advocates for abused and neglected children through an organization named CASA. Only 6% of the current volunteers are black.
In the same newspaper there is a long article about food stamp fraud. It seems that of all agencies our Agriculture Department is out of control with a runaway food stamp program. Recipients can sell their food stamp cards for cash and request a replacement. Stores are forbidden to request identification to verify ownership. Also, many card owners get cash from crooked retail store operators to buy alcohol and drugs. So what is the Ag Department's remedy? They will now allow states to "question" card holders who lose more than three cards in a calender year". Also, this crack federal agency has requested that Facebook, Twitter, Ebay,and Craigslist not allow the buying and selling of food stamp cards on the Internet. WOW! If the Ag guys are not careful they may take action that could reduce their bulging federal budgets. God forbid! Their answer on why they tread so carefully in controlling the system, "many of our people are homeless or have dementia or mental illness." So the federal government's solution to the homeless and the mentally ill is to allow food stamp trafficking to funnel cash and drugs to recipients?
In the same edition of this newspaper (I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP) the director of advocacy for the Capital (that be Austin) Area Food Bank authored a huge article entitled, "Combat hunger and you'll combat other health issues". Her article was just loaded with facts. I have wondered personally how we can fight world hunger and obesity among the poor all at the same time. She really cleared it up for slow people like me. Ms. Green starts with the fact, "that 1 of every 6 Americans struggle with hunger". She continues, "as hunger is often a symptom of poverty, those cannot purchase nutritious food." She says, "surprisingly, some hungry people are also overweight. This occurs when access to fresh, nutritious food is difficult and expensive." WOW, WOW, AND A DOUBLE WOW! Thank goodness for Michelle Obama and her White House garden! And then Ms. Green really takes it home with more statistics, "According to the Center of Disease Prevention more than 1 in 3 adults and 17% of children are OBESE." And now Ms. Green's solution, "Programs such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps) need to give more hungry people more purchasing power to buy food." Can you believe the name of the food stamp program? By putting more money into the program we turned hunger into obesity. If we can just put more money in we can all buy veggies from someone like Michelle and live happily ever after. What a great country we live in!
Just looking at "the facts". We are basically told that about 45% of Americans are fat and hungry, and we just need a few more programs from the federal government and more money of rich tax payers. Making poor people obese just isn't fair.
So what is the big problem here? It is the old producer and moocher thing. There are too many government programs providing incentives for moochers to take from the producers. The programs are for food stamps, welfare payments, tax rebates for non-tax payers, extended unemployment and fake disability claims, student loans, incentives for single parents, marriage tax penalties, public housing, etc., etc. It is clear that Obama wants to drive organizations like the Catholic Church out of the assistance business whether it be hospitals, schools, or charities for the poor. HHS recently said religious organisations must provide early abortion support to their employees resulting in laws suits this week. Obama wants his voting base to look to HIM, not their church or community for assistance and a safety net.
Why pick on blacks who certainly aren't all problems nor do they represent all of our nation's problems. Because there are too many blacks mooching and not enough producing. Some blacks believe they are entitled to mooch off white tax payers because their ancestors were mistreated. There are black pimps who work to keep blacks down and under their influence and control. Obama is a black pimp. He has done nothing to help blacks WORK their way out of poverty. I repeat, WORK, WORK, WORK. This mixed race President who claims to be African American stirs up division between blacks and whites in an attempt to cement his voting block needing over 95% of the black vote for re-election. When blacks were recently interviewed while standing in a welfare line they said they were there to receive their "Obama Juice". Obama isn't alone. There are entire industries and many government agencies working to create a downtrodden black culture from which they can benefit.
Even public educators fight for the status quo which in many black neighborhoods means inferior education. Obama was quick to support stopping funding for Charter Schools in Washington DC once elected. Started in 2004, the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship provided vouchers of up to $7,500 to low-income, mostly minority children for private-school tuition. Democrats never liked the program and -- egged on by the teachers unions -- made the program's demise a top priority. Congress moved to cut off funding, and the Obama administration went right along. Despite the fact Obama's two daughters attend the elite Sidwell Friends School because he knew they would get a far better education there than in the struggling D.C. public schools.
The sad part of this story is, as always, the ones who are hurt the most are the moochers themselves. Shame on us. We were on the right track back when Clinton ran to the middle and passed welfare reform with the Republican Congress. A small step, but in the right direction. And that was a long, long time ago.
Think about it,
Jim
Thursday, May 17, 2012
The Founder's Plan for America Really Does Need "Progressive Change"
The founders drafted many "protective" provisions in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. None of the provisions were more important than those protecting INDIVIDUALS from MAJORITY RULE. Their greatest fears in breaking away from European style monarchies were the threats posed to individual liberties from majority rule.
The founders knew these protections would be needed in a Democracy so basically they created a Republic instead. A good bit of their foundation for government was in expressly protecting the rights of individuals to own property, for religious worship, against unreasonable searches, etc. In addition they established safeguards such as states rights, requirements of 2/3s majorities, and divided powers among the three branches of government as other examples of their fear of big overreaching government. What they didn't anticipate was that this nation would not only open their borders to illegal immigration but would elect an administration who would refuse to enforce the laws while violating their oaths to protect the Constitution.
So where are we? We have just completed a census with more than frightening demographics. A census in which more than half of children less than one year of age are minorities. In Texas alone, more than 7 out of 10 children under age 1 are minorities. In California it is 75%. In Austin, Texas 48% of children under 5 years of age are Hispanic and only 39% are White. There is no question that this trend will change the very nature of our country and culture as we have known it.
And yet today, we have two branches of the government, Executive and US Senate, pushing for an amnesty program called "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" to create a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, most of which are Hispanic. Clearly this legislation would only accelerate the trend to put the White majority into a minority position.
These demographic shifts place a huge burden on our weakened economy with more people suckling at the breast of the tax payer than any founder ever conceived. Jobs at the lower end of the employment ladder, where the welfare recipients should be employed, are going to illegals instead. We are creating a temporary society where poorer American Citizens don't have to take jobs that they are qualified to do because they can choose to take government entitlements instead. A recently unemployed young male welfare recipient said, "He wasn't looking for a job, he was looking for a career". His appearance and poor English were that of an uneducated person like most of the others in this particular, and long, welfare line. Next door, the Employment line where those could find jobs, was unattended. Many of those interviewed said they were there to get their "Obama Juice", that being money, food stamps, and other hand outs.
The more our uneducated underclass are given incentives to not work nor become educated, the more we use illegals to fill the gap, the more we put burdens on our bankrupted welfare state, the more we destroy the basic fabric of our nation.
Earlier the society was defined as temporary. That is because the trend cannot last for long. Why? Because the momma pig being suckled will run out of MONEY. That will happen when others refuse to loan her money to fund our over suckling. She will go dry, and probably within 5-10 years if we continue down this same path. More than likely the society will then turn to some lying impostor who claims he or she will provide something like HOPE AND CHANGE. He or she will take dictatorial powers resembling a third world South American country (Cubans are still driving 55 Chevys, but they need a lot of work).
Obama and those of like minds will have achieved their goal of DOWNSIZING THE USA FROM ITS FORMER POSITION AS A COLONIAL POWER. Unlike Obama, the founders, who came here to escape colonialism, would have called their creation the DEMOCRATIC LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD AND MOST SUCCESSFUL SOCIAL EXPERIMENT IN HISTORY.
What is most sad about such a scenario is those who will suffer the most, as always, will be the poor and middle class who bought into the age old socialist propaganda that their problems are the result of capitalism, liberty, and free markets.
But there is an alternative.
1. Vote Obama and the Democratic Congress out in November. Throw out Career Republican Rhinos.
2. Get the economy moving (we know exactly how to do that and have done it many times before in recovering from a recession: see Ronald Reagan).
3. Close the borders and reform Immigration Laws.
4. Shut down welfare programs and safety nets that do not make able bodied citizens work.
5. Insure that all laws encourage and support families instead of disadvantaging families.
6. Retain our world military leadership with the intent to protect and encourage free markets and liberty. Call out those who enslave their citizens (again: see Ronald Reagan and his Evil Empire strategy)
7. And lastly, explore Constitutional Amendments to strengthen Life, Liberty, Property, and Freedom of Religion rights. "Progressive" change should strengthen the founder's vision of the American dream in the modern world, not destroy their intent. Examine voting rights. Some options might require property owenership or tax payments. Today, we debate whether we can ask for an ID?
The alternative will not be easy. It will take commitment, dedication, and hard work. But mostly, it will take LEADERSHIP. God will surely provide it, but we must make the request. Say your prayers tonight.
Think about it,
Jim
The founders knew these protections would be needed in a Democracy so basically they created a Republic instead. A good bit of their foundation for government was in expressly protecting the rights of individuals to own property, for religious worship, against unreasonable searches, etc. In addition they established safeguards such as states rights, requirements of 2/3s majorities, and divided powers among the three branches of government as other examples of their fear of big overreaching government. What they didn't anticipate was that this nation would not only open their borders to illegal immigration but would elect an administration who would refuse to enforce the laws while violating their oaths to protect the Constitution.
So where are we? We have just completed a census with more than frightening demographics. A census in which more than half of children less than one year of age are minorities. In Texas alone, more than 7 out of 10 children under age 1 are minorities. In California it is 75%. In Austin, Texas 48% of children under 5 years of age are Hispanic and only 39% are White. There is no question that this trend will change the very nature of our country and culture as we have known it.
And yet today, we have two branches of the government, Executive and US Senate, pushing for an amnesty program called "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" to create a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, most of which are Hispanic. Clearly this legislation would only accelerate the trend to put the White majority into a minority position.
These demographic shifts place a huge burden on our weakened economy with more people suckling at the breast of the tax payer than any founder ever conceived. Jobs at the lower end of the employment ladder, where the welfare recipients should be employed, are going to illegals instead. We are creating a temporary society where poorer American Citizens don't have to take jobs that they are qualified to do because they can choose to take government entitlements instead. A recently unemployed young male welfare recipient said, "He wasn't looking for a job, he was looking for a career". His appearance and poor English were that of an uneducated person like most of the others in this particular, and long, welfare line. Next door, the Employment line where those could find jobs, was unattended. Many of those interviewed said they were there to get their "Obama Juice", that being money, food stamps, and other hand outs.
The more our uneducated underclass are given incentives to not work nor become educated, the more we use illegals to fill the gap, the more we put burdens on our bankrupted welfare state, the more we destroy the basic fabric of our nation.
Earlier the society was defined as temporary. That is because the trend cannot last for long. Why? Because the momma pig being suckled will run out of MONEY. That will happen when others refuse to loan her money to fund our over suckling. She will go dry, and probably within 5-10 years if we continue down this same path. More than likely the society will then turn to some lying impostor who claims he or she will provide something like HOPE AND CHANGE. He or she will take dictatorial powers resembling a third world South American country (Cubans are still driving 55 Chevys, but they need a lot of work).
Obama and those of like minds will have achieved their goal of DOWNSIZING THE USA FROM ITS FORMER POSITION AS A COLONIAL POWER. Unlike Obama, the founders, who came here to escape colonialism, would have called their creation the DEMOCRATIC LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD AND MOST SUCCESSFUL SOCIAL EXPERIMENT IN HISTORY.
What is most sad about such a scenario is those who will suffer the most, as always, will be the poor and middle class who bought into the age old socialist propaganda that their problems are the result of capitalism, liberty, and free markets.
But there is an alternative.
1. Vote Obama and the Democratic Congress out in November. Throw out Career Republican Rhinos.
2. Get the economy moving (we know exactly how to do that and have done it many times before in recovering from a recession: see Ronald Reagan).
3. Close the borders and reform Immigration Laws.
4. Shut down welfare programs and safety nets that do not make able bodied citizens work.
5. Insure that all laws encourage and support families instead of disadvantaging families.
6. Retain our world military leadership with the intent to protect and encourage free markets and liberty. Call out those who enslave their citizens (again: see Ronald Reagan and his Evil Empire strategy)
7. And lastly, explore Constitutional Amendments to strengthen Life, Liberty, Property, and Freedom of Religion rights. "Progressive" change should strengthen the founder's vision of the American dream in the modern world, not destroy their intent. Examine voting rights. Some options might require property owenership or tax payments. Today, we debate whether we can ask for an ID?
The alternative will not be easy. It will take commitment, dedication, and hard work. But mostly, it will take LEADERSHIP. God will surely provide it, but we must make the request. Say your prayers tonight.
Think about it,
Jim
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Are the Mexican Cartels Afraid of the First Gay President?
As the free world follows the insane debate over our Skinny President's waffling views on some fabricated thing called gay marriage the Cafe in the City of Hubbard isn't buying in. Butch set the stage as usual, "Debating whether marriage should only be between one man and one woman is as sane as debating whether only women should give birth. Or if it is fair for only men to be able to impregnate a wife. Have we completely lost our minds? Marriage between one man and one woman is a natural and God given law. Birds fly! Fish swim under water! Male dogs mark their territories! Female dogs have puppies! One man marries one woman and they form a family! Period! Debate over. Move on! Hell, I would rather Romney cut my hair off if it was too long, then have to marry Obama!"
Billy Roy piled on, "The same sex marriage debate is perfect for Obama because it is such a ridiculous concept the Liar-In-Chief can make it up as he goes. In 1996 when Obama ran for the Illinois State Senate he filled out a form for a Gay Newspaper questionnaire for candidates and said 'I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages'. In 2004 when he ran for the Senate he said, 'I am not a supporter of gay marriage as it has been thrown out. I think that marriage as in the minds of voters is a religious issue'."
"Then in 2008 when he ran for President, 'I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage'. He said same-sex marriage was against his religion and something that should be in the hands of churches rather than government. By October 2010 as President he acknowledged, 'I have been against same-sex marriage because of my understanding of traditional definitions. But I also think that attitudes evolve, including mine'. Then last week he said, 'I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to be married'. Wow! Well I've been evolving on big, fat guys being able to jump like bull frogs but it just hasn't happened for this cowboy yet."
"Same sex marriage is just like Obama. It is phony in its very nature. Obama thinks that if he just says something, it is then true. Saying two people of the same sex can be married just doesn't make it true. Marriage is a sacred union between only one man and only one woman with the intent of creating children and providing care for a natural family. My barn swallows even understand that. My barn swallows have not been able to 'evolve' because it takes God to make 'natural' changes not some bozo like what Time magazine calls the first gay president. Remember when they called Clinton the first black president. You know 'saying it' didn't make that true either. Clinton is still white except for that huge nose of his which seems to always glow like a big red neon sign. The awful truth is Obama doesn't care one bit about any kind of marriage, he just cares about downsizing the mean old USA, and destroying the concept of the family is the foundation of this great country."
"And while this stupid crap is going on there is a little item in the paper about 47 bodies found in Mexico on a popular route from Central America to Texas with their arms, hands, feet, and heads amputated. The bodies are unidentified and believed to be kidnapped citizens. And get this, IT IS THE FOURTH MASSACRE THIS MONTH. The UN backed by US air power overthrew the Libyan leader, Qaddafi, and slaughtered his military for far less than this. The fact that our political leaders allow open borders with millions of illegal immigrants including drug smugglers and terrorists pouring over our borders breeding the lawlessness that results in these massacres is criminal. Every American citizen should be totally ashamed. My guess is this problem would not be ranked in the top five issues the American voter cares about. Just where is out shame?"
"What is the Liberal solution? COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM, which is a code name for providing amnesty to illegals which would give the Dem's a voting majority that would destroy the country as we know it. All Libs care about is power."
Mom had a question, "I get that you would do more with this Mexican problem. Like what?"
"Hell, Maxine, I not only would put troops and drones on the border to close it down to drugs, terrorists, and illegals, but I would pursue them into Mexico if that is what it took to shut down the massacres and illegal drug trade. I just read that 70% of the Mexican population would welcome American assistance in combating the drug cartels. How can the rest of the world respect us if we allow this rotten situation just to the south of us? We should tell the Mexican officials that either they clean the mess up or we will. I would be patient though and give them a good week for their answer."
Well as they say, Billy Roy has a different way of looking at things then a lot of people. Is Mexico on your worry screen?
Think about it,
Jim
Billy Roy piled on, "The same sex marriage debate is perfect for Obama because it is such a ridiculous concept the Liar-In-Chief can make it up as he goes. In 1996 when Obama ran for the Illinois State Senate he filled out a form for a Gay Newspaper questionnaire for candidates and said 'I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages'. In 2004 when he ran for the Senate he said, 'I am not a supporter of gay marriage as it has been thrown out. I think that marriage as in the minds of voters is a religious issue'."
"Then in 2008 when he ran for President, 'I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage'. He said same-sex marriage was against his religion and something that should be in the hands of churches rather than government. By October 2010 as President he acknowledged, 'I have been against same-sex marriage because of my understanding of traditional definitions. But I also think that attitudes evolve, including mine'. Then last week he said, 'I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to be married'. Wow! Well I've been evolving on big, fat guys being able to jump like bull frogs but it just hasn't happened for this cowboy yet."
"Same sex marriage is just like Obama. It is phony in its very nature. Obama thinks that if he just says something, it is then true. Saying two people of the same sex can be married just doesn't make it true. Marriage is a sacred union between only one man and only one woman with the intent of creating children and providing care for a natural family. My barn swallows even understand that. My barn swallows have not been able to 'evolve' because it takes God to make 'natural' changes not some bozo like what Time magazine calls the first gay president. Remember when they called Clinton the first black president. You know 'saying it' didn't make that true either. Clinton is still white except for that huge nose of his which seems to always glow like a big red neon sign. The awful truth is Obama doesn't care one bit about any kind of marriage, he just cares about downsizing the mean old USA, and destroying the concept of the family is the foundation of this great country."
"And while this stupid crap is going on there is a little item in the paper about 47 bodies found in Mexico on a popular route from Central America to Texas with their arms, hands, feet, and heads amputated. The bodies are unidentified and believed to be kidnapped citizens. And get this, IT IS THE FOURTH MASSACRE THIS MONTH. The UN backed by US air power overthrew the Libyan leader, Qaddafi, and slaughtered his military for far less than this. The fact that our political leaders allow open borders with millions of illegal immigrants including drug smugglers and terrorists pouring over our borders breeding the lawlessness that results in these massacres is criminal. Every American citizen should be totally ashamed. My guess is this problem would not be ranked in the top five issues the American voter cares about. Just where is out shame?"
"What is the Liberal solution? COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM, which is a code name for providing amnesty to illegals which would give the Dem's a voting majority that would destroy the country as we know it. All Libs care about is power."
Mom had a question, "I get that you would do more with this Mexican problem. Like what?"
"Hell, Maxine, I not only would put troops and drones on the border to close it down to drugs, terrorists, and illegals, but I would pursue them into Mexico if that is what it took to shut down the massacres and illegal drug trade. I just read that 70% of the Mexican population would welcome American assistance in combating the drug cartels. How can the rest of the world respect us if we allow this rotten situation just to the south of us? We should tell the Mexican officials that either they clean the mess up or we will. I would be patient though and give them a good week for their answer."
Well as they say, Billy Roy has a different way of looking at things then a lot of people. Is Mexico on your worry screen?
Think about it,
Jim
Thursday, May 10, 2012
The Big Unemployment Lie That Might Re-Elect Obama
In January this blog reported Obama’s good news to the nation that unemployment had gone down to 8.5%. In February we reported another announced drop to 8.3%. On May 5th, even with lousy jobs numbers of just over 115,000 new jobs added (we need 400,000 per month minimum), the number was reduced to just above the magic number of 8%. Historians tell us no President has ever been re-elected with an UNEMPLOYMENT RATE over 8%. Real close, huh?
Unless there is a public outcry Obama can falsify the unemployment number to be anything he wishes to support his deceit of the electorate and gain his re-election.
In January we reported Hilda Lucia Solis may be the most important person in the country when it comes to the 2012 Presidential Election. Why? Because Hilda can make Obama's Unemployment Number anything that Obama wants it to be. Right now he is falsely reporting an 8.1% Unemployment Rate. Ms. Solis, Obama’s chief chef, is “COOKING THE BOOKS”! Here is how it works.
When Obama entered office the Civilian Population of the United States was approximately 234.6 million people. The percentage the Department of Labor (under George Bush) calculated as being in the Work Force was 66.1% (called the participation rate) or 155 million of the total population. Today, the population has increased by 8.1 million people since Bush left office, and yet the Obama DOL reports the Work Force has shrunk by 647 thousand workers. They report that only 63.6% of the Population (again, called the Participation Rate) is in the Work Force.
Bush’s DOL reported that 145.5 million workers were employed and 9.5 million were unemployed and the rate of unemployment was 6.1%. Obama reports today 139.6 million (almost 6 million fewer) are employed and 13.8 million are unemployed (4.3 million more). As the people looking for jobs know, this so called recovery is non-existent.
Yet, because Obama reduces the estimated Work Force each reporting period he shows improvement in the Unemployment metric. The punch line is this. IF OBAMA USED THE SAME PARTICIPATION RATE AS BUSH (AND WASN’T COOKING THE BOOKS) TODAY’S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE WOULD BE A TRUE…….13% INSTEAD OF THE REPORTED 8.1% (SOON TO BE UNDER 8%).
THE LOGIC IS SIMPLE. THEY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THE WORK FORCE, KEEP THE EMPLOYED NUMBER THE SAME, AND FORCE A SMALLER PERCENTAGE AS UNEMPLOYED. THE MATH WORKS LIKE THIS. IF I HAVE 100 PEOPLE IN THE WORK FORCE AND 80 ARE EMPLOYED MY UNEMPLOYMENT PERCENTAGE IS 20%. IF IN THE NEXT REPORTING PERIOD I REDUCE THE WORK FORCE TO 90 AND 80 ARE EMPLOYED MY UNEMPLOYMENT PERCENTAGE GOES DOWN TO 11%. THE LIARS CAN MAKE THE NUMBER ANYTHING THEY WISH JUST BY ADJUSTING THE PARTICIPATION PERCENTAGE.
GOT IT. JUST AS YOU KNEW, THESE PEOPLE MAKE BILL CLINTON LOOK MINOR LEAGUE WHEN IT COMES TO DISTORTING THE TRUTH.
RAW NUMBERS: WE NEED 156 THOUSAND NEW JOBS EACH MONTH JUST TO KEEP UP WITH POPULATION GROWTH. WE NEED ANOTHER 250 JOBS EACH MONTH TO GET THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE NEAR THE 2008 NUMBER. ANY REPORT LESS THAN 400 THOUSAND JOBS ADDED PER MONTH WILL NOT MEASURE UP. BEWARE OF THE “CHERRY PICKING” WHICH THE OBAMA CREW (INCLUDING THE OBAMA PRESS) WILL SURELY DO.
Sometimes we have to go into the weeds because that is where the snakes like Obama and Hilda live. David Axelrod, Obama’s Lie-Master, knows the press will not get into the weeds, and doubts we will.
Think about it,
Jim
Unless there is a public outcry Obama can falsify the unemployment number to be anything he wishes to support his deceit of the electorate and gain his re-election.
In January we reported Hilda Lucia Solis may be the most important person in the country when it comes to the 2012 Presidential Election. Why? Because Hilda can make Obama's Unemployment Number anything that Obama wants it to be. Right now he is falsely reporting an 8.1% Unemployment Rate. Ms. Solis, Obama’s chief chef, is “COOKING THE BOOKS”! Here is how it works.
When Obama entered office the Civilian Population of the United States was approximately 234.6 million people. The percentage the Department of Labor (under George Bush) calculated as being in the Work Force was 66.1% (called the participation rate) or 155 million of the total population. Today, the population has increased by 8.1 million people since Bush left office, and yet the Obama DOL reports the Work Force has shrunk by 647 thousand workers. They report that only 63.6% of the Population (again, called the Participation Rate) is in the Work Force.
Bush’s DOL reported that 145.5 million workers were employed and 9.5 million were unemployed and the rate of unemployment was 6.1%. Obama reports today 139.6 million (almost 6 million fewer) are employed and 13.8 million are unemployed (4.3 million more). As the people looking for jobs know, this so called recovery is non-existent.
Yet, because Obama reduces the estimated Work Force each reporting period he shows improvement in the Unemployment metric. The punch line is this. IF OBAMA USED THE SAME PARTICIPATION RATE AS BUSH (AND WASN’T COOKING THE BOOKS) TODAY’S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE WOULD BE A TRUE…….13% INSTEAD OF THE REPORTED 8.1% (SOON TO BE UNDER 8%).
THE LOGIC IS SIMPLE. THEY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THE WORK FORCE, KEEP THE EMPLOYED NUMBER THE SAME, AND FORCE A SMALLER PERCENTAGE AS UNEMPLOYED. THE MATH WORKS LIKE THIS. IF I HAVE 100 PEOPLE IN THE WORK FORCE AND 80 ARE EMPLOYED MY UNEMPLOYMENT PERCENTAGE IS 20%. IF IN THE NEXT REPORTING PERIOD I REDUCE THE WORK FORCE TO 90 AND 80 ARE EMPLOYED MY UNEMPLOYMENT PERCENTAGE GOES DOWN TO 11%. THE LIARS CAN MAKE THE NUMBER ANYTHING THEY WISH JUST BY ADJUSTING THE PARTICIPATION PERCENTAGE.
GOT IT. JUST AS YOU KNEW, THESE PEOPLE MAKE BILL CLINTON LOOK MINOR LEAGUE WHEN IT COMES TO DISTORTING THE TRUTH.
RAW NUMBERS: WE NEED 156 THOUSAND NEW JOBS EACH MONTH JUST TO KEEP UP WITH POPULATION GROWTH. WE NEED ANOTHER 250 JOBS EACH MONTH TO GET THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE NEAR THE 2008 NUMBER. ANY REPORT LESS THAN 400 THOUSAND JOBS ADDED PER MONTH WILL NOT MEASURE UP. BEWARE OF THE “CHERRY PICKING” WHICH THE OBAMA CREW (INCLUDING THE OBAMA PRESS) WILL SURELY DO.
Sometimes we have to go into the weeds because that is where the snakes like Obama and Hilda live. David Axelrod, Obama’s Lie-Master, knows the press will not get into the weeds, and doubts we will.
Think about it,
Jim
Monday, April 30, 2012
Great News As Obama Avoids War With Iran
Billy Roy kicked off the week with those immortal, yet very local words, "What's in the news, Butch?"
And surprise, surprise Butch had a pocket full, "Front page of most liberal papers broadcast 'Officials say Iran war less likely'. Now there is some real news. ‘Unnamed, anonymous administration sources’ (that would be Obama's campaign managers) seem to believe the meeting we held, in which nothing happened except the setting of another meeting a full month later, plus the UN sanctions were making military action less likely. The article even quoted an OUTSIDE analyst, Dennis Ross, who formerly handled Iran policy for Obama. Boy, it doesn't get more OUTSIDE than that. This article was backed by none other than the Viet Nam traitor, Senator John Kerry, who said, 'I have confidence there is a way forward'. And who doesn’t have confidence in John Kerry when it comes to the nation’s security? So what do you make of this BM?"
"Butch, I saw that article. This Dennis Ross said that even though there isn't an agreement between the US and Israel as to how much time we have before military action is required, there is agreement that, 'there is some time to give diplomacy a chance'. I would guess the Israeli's are talking weeks and months and Obama is talking NEVER. Certainly, Obama doesn't want any Israeli attack before the election. And if they attack after the election, I have big money Obama will not participate, and will blame Israel for any fall out."
"Meanwhile I have no doubt that Obama is up to some real dirty tricks in Israel. He is clearly stirring up unrest against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu within the opposing political parties in Israel. Netanyahu's term in office expires in October of 2013 while Obama's term runs out in November of this year. However in Israel it is common for them to call for elections earlier than the expiration of the term. So you can bet Obama is doing everything he can to try to tie the current Prime Minister up with a re-election in 2012 making it difficult to strike Iran prior to our election. Obama's press lackeys, the Associated Press, reported this weekend, 'Israel's own elites (that would be (Jewish Liberals) and the world community (that would be Obama and Iran) seem largely united in preferring Netanyahu's demise'. You can bet the Iranians are cheering those elites on."
Mom could wait no longer, "Could the press really believe that anyone in their right minds would think the Iranians will slow down in anyway in developing nuclear weapons and missiles to deliver them because of talks with Obama or any silly UN economic sanctions?" She was looking right at Billy Roy with this one.
"No Mam. The Associated Press doesn't believe it and they don't care as long as the scheme will help Obama's re-election efforts. In fact I will bet you the Iranians will fake a slow down in their race to nukes and drag out negotiations to gain time and bring pressure against Netanyahu. Obama will be in cahoots with the Iranian terrorists by praising their willingness to negotiate and will support lifting sanctions as the talks progress. It will all be a huge hoax."
Mom came back, "Yes and that hoax will result in the greatest threat we have to the free world. I can't think of anything worse than arming the Iranian Muslim Radicals with nuclear weapons that they can use on their Jewish and Arab enemies and can sell to other terrorists around the world. I think any sane person would believe this is a bigger threat than North Korea, China, Russia, Al Qaeda, or Syria, and yet it looks like Obama will treat it like any other of his dirty political tricks. He will lie, lie, and lie."
Butch's antenna came up, "Speaking of Syria, Obama said when he gave military support to the Libyan rebels, 'it was our responsibility to protect those threatened with massacre. To not do so would be a betrayal of who we are'. Sounds great, huh. Meanwhile, Assad in Syria is beyond the threatening stage and has massacred over 9,000 of his own people as Obama protects American Women against mean old Republicans. And what does skinny do with Syria but support UN travel and financial restrictions on those who use social media to track down dissidents. Can you believe it?"
"Yep," came back BM. "Obama is up to his old tricks. He acts as if our only possible actions against Syria are to support the UN's impotent initiatives (which will be voted down by the Russians) or to go to war by putting boots on the ground. As Maxine say's 'any sane person' knows this is a false choice. We could be arming and training the revolutionaries in support of their efforts while organizing additional support outside of the UN with those threatened by the Syrian/Iranian thugs. That would include every country except Russia, Iran, and Syria."
Aunt Martha even entered this exchange, "Obama is doing more than you outlined, Billy Roy. He has also appointed an Atrocities Prevention Board. That has got to send real chills up that mean old Assad’s spine, if he has one."
And that last one brought this coffee to a close on this day at the Hubbard City Cafe.
Think about it,
Jim
And surprise, surprise Butch had a pocket full, "Front page of most liberal papers broadcast 'Officials say Iran war less likely'. Now there is some real news. ‘Unnamed, anonymous administration sources’ (that would be Obama's campaign managers) seem to believe the meeting we held, in which nothing happened except the setting of another meeting a full month later, plus the UN sanctions were making military action less likely. The article even quoted an OUTSIDE analyst, Dennis Ross, who formerly handled Iran policy for Obama. Boy, it doesn't get more OUTSIDE than that. This article was backed by none other than the Viet Nam traitor, Senator John Kerry, who said, 'I have confidence there is a way forward'. And who doesn’t have confidence in John Kerry when it comes to the nation’s security? So what do you make of this BM?"
"Butch, I saw that article. This Dennis Ross said that even though there isn't an agreement between the US and Israel as to how much time we have before military action is required, there is agreement that, 'there is some time to give diplomacy a chance'. I would guess the Israeli's are talking weeks and months and Obama is talking NEVER. Certainly, Obama doesn't want any Israeli attack before the election. And if they attack after the election, I have big money Obama will not participate, and will blame Israel for any fall out."
"Meanwhile I have no doubt that Obama is up to some real dirty tricks in Israel. He is clearly stirring up unrest against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu within the opposing political parties in Israel. Netanyahu's term in office expires in October of 2013 while Obama's term runs out in November of this year. However in Israel it is common for them to call for elections earlier than the expiration of the term. So you can bet Obama is doing everything he can to try to tie the current Prime Minister up with a re-election in 2012 making it difficult to strike Iran prior to our election. Obama's press lackeys, the Associated Press, reported this weekend, 'Israel's own elites (that would be (Jewish Liberals) and the world community (that would be Obama and Iran) seem largely united in preferring Netanyahu's demise'. You can bet the Iranians are cheering those elites on."
Mom could wait no longer, "Could the press really believe that anyone in their right minds would think the Iranians will slow down in anyway in developing nuclear weapons and missiles to deliver them because of talks with Obama or any silly UN economic sanctions?" She was looking right at Billy Roy with this one.
"No Mam. The Associated Press doesn't believe it and they don't care as long as the scheme will help Obama's re-election efforts. In fact I will bet you the Iranians will fake a slow down in their race to nukes and drag out negotiations to gain time and bring pressure against Netanyahu. Obama will be in cahoots with the Iranian terrorists by praising their willingness to negotiate and will support lifting sanctions as the talks progress. It will all be a huge hoax."
Mom came back, "Yes and that hoax will result in the greatest threat we have to the free world. I can't think of anything worse than arming the Iranian Muslim Radicals with nuclear weapons that they can use on their Jewish and Arab enemies and can sell to other terrorists around the world. I think any sane person would believe this is a bigger threat than North Korea, China, Russia, Al Qaeda, or Syria, and yet it looks like Obama will treat it like any other of his dirty political tricks. He will lie, lie, and lie."
Butch's antenna came up, "Speaking of Syria, Obama said when he gave military support to the Libyan rebels, 'it was our responsibility to protect those threatened with massacre. To not do so would be a betrayal of who we are'. Sounds great, huh. Meanwhile, Assad in Syria is beyond the threatening stage and has massacred over 9,000 of his own people as Obama protects American Women against mean old Republicans. And what does skinny do with Syria but support UN travel and financial restrictions on those who use social media to track down dissidents. Can you believe it?"
"Yep," came back BM. "Obama is up to his old tricks. He acts as if our only possible actions against Syria are to support the UN's impotent initiatives (which will be voted down by the Russians) or to go to war by putting boots on the ground. As Maxine say's 'any sane person' knows this is a false choice. We could be arming and training the revolutionaries in support of their efforts while organizing additional support outside of the UN with those threatened by the Syrian/Iranian thugs. That would include every country except Russia, Iran, and Syria."
Aunt Martha even entered this exchange, "Obama is doing more than you outlined, Billy Roy. He has also appointed an Atrocities Prevention Board. That has got to send real chills up that mean old Assad’s spine, if he has one."
And that last one brought this coffee to a close on this day at the Hubbard City Cafe.
Think about it,
Jim
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Obama Launches New Stealth Attacks On All Fronts
Billy Roy's exposure of Obama's War on America has Butch working overtime, "The Obama War on the US Economy is in steal mode but big time destructive. While Americans led by the Obama Media debate oil drilling and natural gas fracking in the US, Obama, the sabotaging magician, is shutting down oil refineries right and left. For example refineries on the East Coast of the US supply 40% of the gasoline sales and 60% of the diesel and other fuel oils. Of that, HALF that comes from refineries that Sunoco and Conoco Phillips have recently closed."
"When Conoco Phillips announced that it was closing the Trainer refinery, Willie Chiang, then Conoco Phillips' Senior Vice President of Refining, Marketing, Transportation and Commercial, noted that their decision to sell, like Sunoco's, was based on unfavorable economics 'caused by product imports, weakness in motor fuel demand, and costly regulatory requirements'."
"Obama is squeezing the refineries out by over regulating on one hand and supporting his United Steelworker contributors by demanding higher wages on the other hand (higher than the 3% annually they have been receiving). The strangling government regulations on the US oil refinery market has forced companies to re-evaluate the cost of doing business in the US."
"Why have operations in the US where you bleed money via regulations, when you can have refineries built in Columbia, Mexico or Brazil for pennies on the dollar, and less regulations? Besides..... our government has given BILLIONS to Columbia and Brazil to build refineries to process all that oil the US is losing. We are building up every country on earth, while destroying our own.... all in the name of redistribution of wealth."
Billy Roy could wait no longer, "These attacks on our energy programs are lethal. We use 20% of the world's oil and produce 2%. This puts us at the mercy of unfriendly foes, high oil prices siphon money out of the rest of the economy while inflating the costs of most other things in our economy like food. Lead times to react and create production and manufacturing are extremely long even without Obama's regulations which means by the time the nation wakes up it could be too late to catch up without crippling damage to the economy. In fact that is part of the Obama idiot pitch, 'Anybody that tells you that drilling now is going to reduce today's gasoline price isn't dealing with facts. There is no magic solution.' This guys statements are worse than slime. When you lie about everything as he does, then people become very accepting of lies. They think, 'that is just the way politicians are.'"
"Speaking of lies, did you see that the Obama administration has the 'text of an agreement' with Afghanistan that will determine how much money we give them for years after we leave in 2014. The agreement does not specify how much support we give nor what the support would be used for. Those little nitty gritty details will be released some time next year after the election. Meanwhile old skinny can campaign on his success in gaining an agreement from Afghanistan that he will say 'will insure the peace after HE has brought the troops home'. I don't know who should disbelieve an Obama agreement more, Americans or Afghans? At least he is consistent as he will lie to both sides as long as it weakens the US internationally."
"The best news I've heard in a while comes from the Catholics. They are really up in arms about Obama's War on Religious Freedom. Many of their leaders are calling for Catholics to go to the polls. One recently compared Obama to Stalin and Hitler. Both used their dictatorial powers to drive the Church out of charity work including health care in forcing people to be dependent on the government instead of the Church. This is exactly what Obama plans. Let's hope the other denominations suck it up and get on board with the Catholics. It wouldn't hurt if the Jews even joined in since we are Israel's only friend and protector. But that might be asking too much. The Catholics are asking their followers to base their election choices on three issues: life (that would be anti-abortion for you guys in Mt. Calm), the sanctity of marriage (you know the man and woman only thing), and religious liberty (like the founders intented)."
"And even Conservative leaders still don't get Obama's INTENT . I heard Mary Matalin (wife of the serpent headed consultant to sleazy Bill Clinton, James Carville) and Liz Cheney talking about how Obama wanted to redistribute wealth by raising the capital gains rate. Everybody knows, including Obama, that raising the capital gains rate reduces tax collections to the government and slows economic growth. This isn't redistribution. This is just another crippling blow to the economy, and that is his INTENT . He doesn't care about the poor as much as he cares about bringing down this bad 'colonial empire'. If we don't even know our nation's number one enemy's INTENTIONS, we will suffer greatly as we under react. More than anything else we need to not be so timid. I am sick of hearing how 'American's like this President, they just don't like his policies'. I am even sick of hearing how good looking and articulate he is. Neither of these things are true. We don't like him, and he is really an ugly dude what with the big ears and everything. We need EXPOSURE of not only his actions, but also his INTENTIONS. He doesn't have policies. He has a every INTENTION to destroy the USA economically, spiritually, and militarily."
And the Obama Wars go on!
Think about it,
Jim
"When Conoco Phillips announced that it was closing the Trainer refinery, Willie Chiang, then Conoco Phillips' Senior Vice President of Refining, Marketing, Transportation and Commercial, noted that their decision to sell, like Sunoco's, was based on unfavorable economics 'caused by product imports, weakness in motor fuel demand, and costly regulatory requirements'."
"Obama is squeezing the refineries out by over regulating on one hand and supporting his United Steelworker contributors by demanding higher wages on the other hand (higher than the 3% annually they have been receiving). The strangling government regulations on the US oil refinery market has forced companies to re-evaluate the cost of doing business in the US."
"Why have operations in the US where you bleed money via regulations, when you can have refineries built in Columbia, Mexico or Brazil for pennies on the dollar, and less regulations? Besides..... our government has given BILLIONS to Columbia and Brazil to build refineries to process all that oil the US is losing. We are building up every country on earth, while destroying our own.... all in the name of redistribution of wealth."
Billy Roy could wait no longer, "These attacks on our energy programs are lethal. We use 20% of the world's oil and produce 2%. This puts us at the mercy of unfriendly foes, high oil prices siphon money out of the rest of the economy while inflating the costs of most other things in our economy like food. Lead times to react and create production and manufacturing are extremely long even without Obama's regulations which means by the time the nation wakes up it could be too late to catch up without crippling damage to the economy. In fact that is part of the Obama idiot pitch, 'Anybody that tells you that drilling now is going to reduce today's gasoline price isn't dealing with facts. There is no magic solution.' This guys statements are worse than slime. When you lie about everything as he does, then people become very accepting of lies. They think, 'that is just the way politicians are.'"
"Speaking of lies, did you see that the Obama administration has the 'text of an agreement' with Afghanistan that will determine how much money we give them for years after we leave in 2014. The agreement does not specify how much support we give nor what the support would be used for. Those little nitty gritty details will be released some time next year after the election. Meanwhile old skinny can campaign on his success in gaining an agreement from Afghanistan that he will say 'will insure the peace after HE has brought the troops home'. I don't know who should disbelieve an Obama agreement more, Americans or Afghans? At least he is consistent as he will lie to both sides as long as it weakens the US internationally."
"The best news I've heard in a while comes from the Catholics. They are really up in arms about Obama's War on Religious Freedom. Many of their leaders are calling for Catholics to go to the polls. One recently compared Obama to Stalin and Hitler. Both used their dictatorial powers to drive the Church out of charity work including health care in forcing people to be dependent on the government instead of the Church. This is exactly what Obama plans. Let's hope the other denominations suck it up and get on board with the Catholics. It wouldn't hurt if the Jews even joined in since we are Israel's only friend and protector. But that might be asking too much. The Catholics are asking their followers to base their election choices on three issues: life (that would be anti-abortion for you guys in Mt. Calm), the sanctity of marriage (you know the man and woman only thing), and religious liberty (like the founders intented)."
"And even Conservative leaders still don't get Obama's INTENT . I heard Mary Matalin (wife of the serpent headed consultant to sleazy Bill Clinton, James Carville) and Liz Cheney talking about how Obama wanted to redistribute wealth by raising the capital gains rate. Everybody knows, including Obama, that raising the capital gains rate reduces tax collections to the government and slows economic growth. This isn't redistribution. This is just another crippling blow to the economy, and that is his INTENT . He doesn't care about the poor as much as he cares about bringing down this bad 'colonial empire'. If we don't even know our nation's number one enemy's INTENTIONS, we will suffer greatly as we under react. More than anything else we need to not be so timid. I am sick of hearing how 'American's like this President, they just don't like his policies'. I am even sick of hearing how good looking and articulate he is. Neither of these things are true. We don't like him, and he is really an ugly dude what with the big ears and everything. We need EXPOSURE of not only his actions, but also his INTENTIONS. He doesn't have policies. He has a every INTENTION to destroy the USA economically, spiritually, and militarily."
And the Obama Wars go on!
Think about it,
Jim
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
