As the news reports, retracts, and re-reports possible deals with Iran only weeks away from the election, I asked Billy Roy if he expected an "October Surprise". BM promised a face to face discussion this next weekend when I will attend the Hubbard High School Homecoming festivities. I will be the featured speaker at a meeting to honor (roast) a Hubbard legend, also known as Gut Anderson. Gut was an amazing athlete big enough and strong enough to throw the shot put in track and annihilate an opposing team in football as he anchored the middle of the line. He also was fast and nimble enough to compete as a pole vaulter, not to mention his fame as a baseball pitcher with a blazing fastball. But I diverge from our "October Surprise".
"Jim, there is no question the Dems are loading their cannons as we speak to attempt to shock voters at the eleventh hour back into the Obama camp. They are only waiting until they are sure there is not enough time for the Romney camp to respond to the bullshit. These Chicago thugs will go deep and dirty. Axlerod has a history of destroying his candidate's opponents in large urban areas where he has mostly represented Black mayors. I asked Butch Jackson, local finder of facts, to pull previous October Surprises. He went to the Dick Morris site and found the following:
From Dick Morris:
Let's remember the history of Democratic October Surprises. Of the past five elections, two have been won solidly by Democrats - 2004 and 1996. The other three all featured October Surprises:
• On October 30, 1992, Iran-Contra Special Prosecutor Lawrence E. Walsh announced that he would indict Bush Defense Secretary Cap Weinberger. The announcement came after Clinton, the Democratic candidate against Bush, had fallen behind in the tracking polls. Clinton surged on the final weekend and won the election, in large part because of the Weinberger indictment announcement. (Bush pardoned Weinberger after the election and he was never actually indicted).
• On October 1, 2000, it was revealed that George W. Bush had been arrested for DUI in Maine in 1976. The arrest had never been made public. Bush was several points ahead in the popular vote prior to the announcement but lost to Gore by 0.5% after the DUI story broke.
• Eight days before the 2004 election, the New York Times revealed that the weapons from a conquered Iraqi weapons dump had been looted by insurgents who were using these weapons against American troops. Democratic candidate John Kerry cancelled his regular TV ads to focus on the discovery and allege Bush Administration incompetence in protecting the weapons. Fortunately, four days later (and four before the election), the Pentagon issues satellite photos of the dump indicating that the story was false.
• The original October Surprise was pulled by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger on behalf of President Richard M. Nixon when he announced that peace in Vietnam was "at hand" on the eve of the 1972 election, only to see the war drag on for months more.
If there be any of us that doubt the potential of both this Administration and the Ayatollah for using chicanery and phony deals to impact the election's outcome, think again!
Meanwhile on the verge of our Foreign Policy debate we find out we had a Drone viewing the planned terrorist attack on Benghazi. Additionally, even the Associated Press is reporting Al Qaeda is flooding back into Afghanistan from Pakistan as we reduce our troop levels in our announced withdrawal. Experts are predicting Yemen will be the first nation to be run by Al Qaeda as bombing attempts are rampant from New York City to Jordan. Seems like Obama has Al Qaeda on the run but they are running in planned attacks on our friends around the world. Obama's plan to allow militant Muslims to gain "justice" is working.
Romney's first statement tonight should be, "Where do I start?"
Jim
Monday, October 22, 2012
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
The Incompetents Latest Move To Get The Moron Vote
The Obama Incompetents have evolved their story (now called narrative by the elites) about Benghazi. Why? They are afraid even moronic voters are fleeing this sinking ship as more and more stories of incompetence and cover up come out each day. Moronic voters, in my definition, are those who have a mental age of from 7 to 12 years when it comes to political knowledge. Mental ages in the teens and higher will vote against Obama.
Here is the latest. To understand their strategy try to dumb down to the moron level so you can relate to their latest ploy. The Secretary of State, Hillary (stand by your man) Clinton, tells CNN the following:
1. The Benghazi situation is my organizational responsibility (not my fault, though).
2. My consulate organizations number over 240 (it is impossible for anyone to keep up with this amount of detail).
3. The President and Vice President were not informed of the security details of these 240 consulates (the buck doesn't stop there, either).
4. We have "career professionals" who are really responsible for security for our consulates (Note that these are not political appointees like me, the Secretary of State. These little people are honest and real buck stoppers.).
5. My greatest hope is that no one uses this tragic event to attempt to gain some political advantage (that would be you, Mitt Romney, if you bring it up in tomorrow night's debate you are shameless).
6. I would now hope we can all focus on investigating this incident to take revenge against the attackers and learn so that this is not repeated (and hopefully this stays quiet until after the election)
7. And then of course, this is backed up by Obama saying during he debate he is responsible for everything (which is nothing), and that he called Benghazi a terrorist attack in the rose garden the day after the attack (a whopper).
Morons of the political world, and particularly of the electorate, eat this up. This same ploy worked when the little girl in the blue dress blew the whistle on Hillary's husband. In other words, this is a tried and true approach that works with the press and with morons.
Let's break this down. Does the buck stop with the President when it comes to protecting those who serve our nation in dangerous federal assignments? Of the 240 consulates facing 911 which were in the most danger? Was Libya, which had reported hundreds of incidents (including blowing a huge hole in the fence surrounding the consulate), on the most dangerous list? Was this the type of topic discussed in White House Security Briefings? If not, why not? Was it discussed with the Secretary of State?
The attack was reported in real time as it happened. Who was notified and when? If the security people misled the administration initially, when did they correct their assessment? How did administration spokes people, including Obama, have it wrong for almost two weeks? When asked by the View women, "Was this a terrorist attack, why did the President say we don't know yet?" Why were administration spokes people political appointees (Clinton, Rice, Axelrod, etc.) instead of career intel professionals?
The truth is once the administration screwed up by not responding to warnings for more security Obama's campaign advisers took over. They created their story, hoped to launch a long investigation, and put the issue to bed until after the election. They thought it would work if the press would just co-operate. And it would have if it hadn't been for those pesky little debates with 60.000.000 viewers hearing about Benghazi first hand.
Again, if the administration is this incompetent, fire them. If they are covering up, fire them. If both are true (which is the case), fire them all.
Today, Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod are running the country, period. They have only one goal to re-elect Obama so he can finish his task of ruining (reforming) this country.
Today the campaign had four administration officials, speaking off the record of course, inform the press of Obama's aggressive plans to find and kill those responsible for Benghazi. Every pharmaceutical factory in Libya is on alert. Why? Remember when Bill Clinton bombed such after the embassy bombing in Nairobi? It was a way to change the subject, and say, hey, we did something. What top security team would alert the terrorist in newspapers that we are coming?
Folks, this is a very sad affair. Four great Americans are dead. Obama got the briefing and went to Las Vegas to campaign. Axelrod and Jarrett covered him. Hillary stood by her new man yesterday. Patreaus and other intel people are accomplices by their silence. The debate narrator came to Obama's aid tonight. Mitt Romney let Obama off the hook in the town hall debate. Sandra Crawley, the narrator, helped. However, Monday night is the foreign affairs debate. My guess is Romney will make it about Benghazi exposing the facts, lies, and cover up. He will show it is symptomatic of Obama's failing policies.
Obama's last resort in campaigning is all aimed at the morons needed to keep the elite in power.
It won't work. When you are this incompetent and deceitful even the morons listen to Clint Eastwood, WHEN YOU DON'T DO THE JOB, YOU HAVE TO GO.
Jim
Here is the latest. To understand their strategy try to dumb down to the moron level so you can relate to their latest ploy. The Secretary of State, Hillary (stand by your man) Clinton, tells CNN the following:
1. The Benghazi situation is my organizational responsibility (not my fault, though).
2. My consulate organizations number over 240 (it is impossible for anyone to keep up with this amount of detail).
3. The President and Vice President were not informed of the security details of these 240 consulates (the buck doesn't stop there, either).
4. We have "career professionals" who are really responsible for security for our consulates (Note that these are not political appointees like me, the Secretary of State. These little people are honest and real buck stoppers.).
5. My greatest hope is that no one uses this tragic event to attempt to gain some political advantage (that would be you, Mitt Romney, if you bring it up in tomorrow night's debate you are shameless).
6. I would now hope we can all focus on investigating this incident to take revenge against the attackers and learn so that this is not repeated (and hopefully this stays quiet until after the election)
7. And then of course, this is backed up by Obama saying during he debate he is responsible for everything (which is nothing), and that he called Benghazi a terrorist attack in the rose garden the day after the attack (a whopper).
Morons of the political world, and particularly of the electorate, eat this up. This same ploy worked when the little girl in the blue dress blew the whistle on Hillary's husband. In other words, this is a tried and true approach that works with the press and with morons.
Let's break this down. Does the buck stop with the President when it comes to protecting those who serve our nation in dangerous federal assignments? Of the 240 consulates facing 911 which were in the most danger? Was Libya, which had reported hundreds of incidents (including blowing a huge hole in the fence surrounding the consulate), on the most dangerous list? Was this the type of topic discussed in White House Security Briefings? If not, why not? Was it discussed with the Secretary of State?
The attack was reported in real time as it happened. Who was notified and when? If the security people misled the administration initially, when did they correct their assessment? How did administration spokes people, including Obama, have it wrong for almost two weeks? When asked by the View women, "Was this a terrorist attack, why did the President say we don't know yet?" Why were administration spokes people political appointees (Clinton, Rice, Axelrod, etc.) instead of career intel professionals?
The truth is once the administration screwed up by not responding to warnings for more security Obama's campaign advisers took over. They created their story, hoped to launch a long investigation, and put the issue to bed until after the election. They thought it would work if the press would just co-operate. And it would have if it hadn't been for those pesky little debates with 60.000.000 viewers hearing about Benghazi first hand.
Again, if the administration is this incompetent, fire them. If they are covering up, fire them. If both are true (which is the case), fire them all.
Today, Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod are running the country, period. They have only one goal to re-elect Obama so he can finish his task of ruining (reforming) this country.
Today the campaign had four administration officials, speaking off the record of course, inform the press of Obama's aggressive plans to find and kill those responsible for Benghazi. Every pharmaceutical factory in Libya is on alert. Why? Remember when Bill Clinton bombed such after the embassy bombing in Nairobi? It was a way to change the subject, and say, hey, we did something. What top security team would alert the terrorist in newspapers that we are coming?
Folks, this is a very sad affair. Four great Americans are dead. Obama got the briefing and went to Las Vegas to campaign. Axelrod and Jarrett covered him. Hillary stood by her new man yesterday. Patreaus and other intel people are accomplices by their silence. The debate narrator came to Obama's aid tonight. Mitt Romney let Obama off the hook in the town hall debate. Sandra Crawley, the narrator, helped. However, Monday night is the foreign affairs debate. My guess is Romney will make it about Benghazi exposing the facts, lies, and cover up. He will show it is symptomatic of Obama's failing policies.
Obama's last resort in campaigning is all aimed at the morons needed to keep the elite in power.
It won't work. When you are this incompetent and deceitful even the morons listen to Clint Eastwood, WHEN YOU DON'T DO THE JOB, YOU HAVE TO GO.
Jim
Friday, October 12, 2012
"The Donald Trump Principle" Can End This Race
With debates, ambassador murders, and political discourse dominated by
claims of lies, lies, and more lies I thought it was time to check in with
Billy Roy, the unofficial Chairman of the Hubbard City Cafe. My question was
pretty simple and pretty direct. "BM, where is all this going?"
"This race is about over. One of the Republicans is going to trip on
what I call the 'Donald Trump Principle' and it just has to happen real soon.
When it does this race is over."
"Can't wait, BM. Lay it on me."
"It is about Benghazi, Jim. Ryan could have ended the race last night.
Romney could end it on Tuesday. It is this simple. Mr. President, assuming you
are telling the truth about Benghazi that you, Biden, Clinton (State
Department), Petraeus (CIA), and your other security leaders did not know about
the terrorist attack until about two weeks after it happened and that you
thought during this period of time it was a spontaneous demonstration about a
video that turned into an attack. Again, giving you the benefit of the doubt
that you are telling the truth that you, Biden, Clinton, Petraeus and security
crew did not know our consulate people were in danger and asking for additional
security as we approached the 911 anniversary. AGAIN, GIVING YOU THE BENEFIT OF
A DOUBT THEN YOU, BIDEN, CLINTON, PATRAEUS AND CREW SHOULD ALL BE FIRED
IMMEDIATELY FOR YOUR TOTAL INCOMPETENCE. ANY FOOL KNEW WITHIN DAYS, IF NOT
HOURS, THIS WAS A PLANNED ATTACK. ANY FOOL KNEW BENGHAZI WAS A DANGEROUS PLACE
AND THAT OUR AMBASSODOR NEEDED A FULL FORCE OF MARINES AND TOP SECURITY GUARDS
ALONG WITH FORTIFIED FACILITIES. FIRE THOSE IN CHARGE. WE CANNOT HAVE
INCOMPETENTS LIKE THIS IN CHARGE DURING THESE DANGEROUS TIMES."
"Now, Jim, let's explore the alternative. What if Obama, Biden,
Clinton, Petraeus, and the security leaders were lying about what they knew and
when they knew. In other words they were covering up the truth because it was
not convenient to support their claims that Obama had killed Bin Laden and had
Al Qaeda on the run which drove up his poll numbers before this election. So if
they are really competent but liars and colluding on a political cover-up to
keep the truth from American voters then guess what? OBAMA, BIDEN, CLINTON,
PATRAEUS, AND THE SECURITY CREW NEED TO BE FIRED IMMEDIATELY. RACE OVER!"
"BM, you might just have something here. If Donald Trump wouldn't put
up with this, why should the American people? And they won’t put up with either
the incompetence or the deceit if Mitt Romney will make the charge. The Chicago
thugs have trapped themselves."
It couldn’t happen to a worse group of people,
Jim
Monday, October 1, 2012
Anyone But Us and the US!!!
As any intelligent American fumes over the murder of our people in Libya, and even more so, the total and despicable cover up by Obama, Hillary, Rice, and the other thugs in some ways it distracts us from the BIG PICTURE which is even scarier. Most would say Obama and crew are lying about Libya because it tarnishes the Democratic claim of killing Bin Laden and the near annihilation of Al Queda that was put forth by most speakers and celebrated only two weeks ago at the Democratic Convention. The BIG TRUTH is much worse.
Obama and his inner circle (probably it doesn't even include Hillary who like Bill is a pawn) are working to keep all Americans from grasping their clear desire and strategy to bring down the United States of America. That would be us (meaning you and I) and US (meaning our country). And they have taken huge steps to do just that.
Let's start by looking at the two most important goals we SHOULD have in our foreign affairs (you could also call it Defense). First, the most important goal is to keep Americans safe from attack, and particularly from unconventional weapons (mass destructive and nuclear weapons). Secondly, the US must keep foreign oil from falling into the hands of bad guys who would stop the free trade of such. Why? Because not just the US but the entire world economy runs on fossil fuel energy, and because 70% of the world's proven oil reserves are threatened in the Middle East by very bad people.
Next, let's understand Obama. For what ever reasons (revolutionary, anti-colonial, corporatist, socialist, communist, or muslim), HE CLEARLY BELIEVES IN HIS BONES THAT THE USA IS THE BAD GUY! Therefore, helping anyone else against the USA, and us, is a good thing!
Proof? Let's look at Obama's actions in the Middle East and Northern Africa. Obama supported the Arab Spring uprisings and overthrow of leaders in the following countries: Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen. What did they have in common? They were allies of the USA. Yep, even Qaddafi in his later years. Many were dictators and strongmen, but still allies. Also, mostly, they kept the terrorists under control.
Let's now look at Obama's "in-actions" where he has given no support in the same type of uprisings: Iran and Syria. What do they have in common? They are both anti-American and anti-Israel. We never lifted a finger in Iran knowing the people in the street would be less dangerous than the current mullahs and dictator who soon will have nuclear weapons. In Libya we stepped in when a few hundred people were killed by Qaddafi. In Syria we sit on the fence while Assad kills 20,000-30,000 people with the assistance of Iran and the Russians.
How about Iraq and Afghanistan where the Bush administration declared you are either for the USA or against us? If against us, we will not let you harbor terrorists. Our troops have been giving their lives in a War Against Muslim Terrorists. Obama pulls out of Iraq on schedule, BUT offers such a small residual force to the newly elected leadership they reject any American forces. In fact they feel their only choice is to cooperate with Iran (where they are currently allowing flyovers to Syria). Next, how about Obama's "good war" where we will fight Al Queda, our real enemy. Obama rarely mentions the Taliban who our troops are really fighting because he hopes to negotiate a settlement with them and pull our troops out. Obama condemns the elected President Karzai, an American and Bush friend, as corrupt. Just this Sunday on 60 Minutes Karzai proclaimed his dislike of Obama who has disengaged from the defense of Afghanistan in Karzai's battle with terrorists. Even American General on the same program admitted Al Queda was back empowering the Taliban against our troops, and that Obama's announced departure date hung over his head every day.
Soon we will be gone from both countries and our loss of blood and money will be squandered purposely in Obama's scheme to weaken the real BAD GUY (that would be us and US).
If you still have any doubt about Obama's hatred of American allies you have to look no further than his treatment of Netanyahu and the Israelis. Many think they are are best friend and ally. In the world of Obama they are literally TOAST, and soon.
Clearly taking these actions and their end results into consideration let's go back to our two most important foreign policy goals. HAS OBAMA'S ACTIONS DELIBERATELY MADE AMERICANS LESS SAFE FROM WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND NUCLEAR MUSLIM EXTREMISTS? HAS OBAMA'S DELIBERATE ACTIONS PUT THE WORLD'S OIL SUPPLY AT RISK IN AN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY THE INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS?
Is Obama that smart and that evil or is he that dumb and incompetent? DOES IT MATTER? As they say, "it is what it is."
We have less than 60 days to save the greatest nation in the world.
Think about it,
Jim
P. S. This Wednesday night Obama will attempt to debate a ficticious "strawman" created by Axlerod. Romney will attempt to debate Obama. Say your prayers.
Obama and his inner circle (probably it doesn't even include Hillary who like Bill is a pawn) are working to keep all Americans from grasping their clear desire and strategy to bring down the United States of America. That would be us (meaning you and I) and US (meaning our country). And they have taken huge steps to do just that.
Let's start by looking at the two most important goals we SHOULD have in our foreign affairs (you could also call it Defense). First, the most important goal is to keep Americans safe from attack, and particularly from unconventional weapons (mass destructive and nuclear weapons). Secondly, the US must keep foreign oil from falling into the hands of bad guys who would stop the free trade of such. Why? Because not just the US but the entire world economy runs on fossil fuel energy, and because 70% of the world's proven oil reserves are threatened in the Middle East by very bad people.
Next, let's understand Obama. For what ever reasons (revolutionary, anti-colonial, corporatist, socialist, communist, or muslim), HE CLEARLY BELIEVES IN HIS BONES THAT THE USA IS THE BAD GUY! Therefore, helping anyone else against the USA, and us, is a good thing!
Proof? Let's look at Obama's actions in the Middle East and Northern Africa. Obama supported the Arab Spring uprisings and overthrow of leaders in the following countries: Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen. What did they have in common? They were allies of the USA. Yep, even Qaddafi in his later years. Many were dictators and strongmen, but still allies. Also, mostly, they kept the terrorists under control.
Let's now look at Obama's "in-actions" where he has given no support in the same type of uprisings: Iran and Syria. What do they have in common? They are both anti-American and anti-Israel. We never lifted a finger in Iran knowing the people in the street would be less dangerous than the current mullahs and dictator who soon will have nuclear weapons. In Libya we stepped in when a few hundred people were killed by Qaddafi. In Syria we sit on the fence while Assad kills 20,000-30,000 people with the assistance of Iran and the Russians.
How about Iraq and Afghanistan where the Bush administration declared you are either for the USA or against us? If against us, we will not let you harbor terrorists. Our troops have been giving their lives in a War Against Muslim Terrorists. Obama pulls out of Iraq on schedule, BUT offers such a small residual force to the newly elected leadership they reject any American forces. In fact they feel their only choice is to cooperate with Iran (where they are currently allowing flyovers to Syria). Next, how about Obama's "good war" where we will fight Al Queda, our real enemy. Obama rarely mentions the Taliban who our troops are really fighting because he hopes to negotiate a settlement with them and pull our troops out. Obama condemns the elected President Karzai, an American and Bush friend, as corrupt. Just this Sunday on 60 Minutes Karzai proclaimed his dislike of Obama who has disengaged from the defense of Afghanistan in Karzai's battle with terrorists. Even American General on the same program admitted Al Queda was back empowering the Taliban against our troops, and that Obama's announced departure date hung over his head every day.
Soon we will be gone from both countries and our loss of blood and money will be squandered purposely in Obama's scheme to weaken the real BAD GUY (that would be us and US).
If you still have any doubt about Obama's hatred of American allies you have to look no further than his treatment of Netanyahu and the Israelis. Many think they are are best friend and ally. In the world of Obama they are literally TOAST, and soon.
Clearly taking these actions and their end results into consideration let's go back to our two most important foreign policy goals. HAS OBAMA'S ACTIONS DELIBERATELY MADE AMERICANS LESS SAFE FROM WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND NUCLEAR MUSLIM EXTREMISTS? HAS OBAMA'S DELIBERATE ACTIONS PUT THE WORLD'S OIL SUPPLY AT RISK IN AN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY THE INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS?
Is Obama that smart and that evil or is he that dumb and incompetent? DOES IT MATTER? As they say, "it is what it is."
We have less than 60 days to save the greatest nation in the world.
Think about it,
Jim
P. S. This Wednesday night Obama will attempt to debate a ficticious "strawman" created by Axlerod. Romney will attempt to debate Obama. Say your prayers.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Why Mitt Doesn't Carry His Old State?
Billy Roy Got a Letter:
Dear Billy Roy,
Dear Billy Roy,
My very left wing baby sister posed a question I can not answer. Maybe you can help. She wants to know if Mitt is so good, why is he behind 25% in the state where he was Governor? The only thing I could come up with was that they have their health care as much as the nation hates Obama Care. Any insight on this one?
Bobby Joe Biggers
Big Brother to A Little Sister Gone Loco
Big Brother to A Little Sister Gone Loco
Billy Roy's Response:
Dear Bobby Joe,
Dear Bobby Joe,
Sorry to hear about your little sister.
Massa-what-ever-it-is (never wanted to learn out to spell it) is like California and New York in that it is hugely, I mean hugely, Liberal. When they get in real trouble spending wildly and with excessive crime and lawlessness, they elect token Conservatives. NY does it with mayors and governors, like Rudy Giuliani and George Pataki. California did it with Reagan, and then tried it with Arnold Schwarzenegger (found out he was about as conservative as Obama is American). Ronald Reagan cleaned California up, and then they went back to their spending sprees.
Massa-what-ever-it-is (never wanted to learn out to spell it) is like California and New York in that it is hugely, I mean hugely, Liberal. When they get in real trouble spending wildly and with excessive crime and lawlessness, they elect token Conservatives. NY does it with mayors and governors, like Rudy Giuliani and George Pataki. California did it with Reagan, and then tried it with Arnold Schwarzenegger (found out he was about as conservative as Obama is American). Ronald Reagan cleaned California up, and then they went back to their spending sprees.
Same with Massachusetts. Romney cleaned up their debt and put them back on their feet. Mitt has been successful with every job he has had (not that 47% of Americans care).
Other entities, states, are doing this now. Ohio, Wisconsin, Florida, Virginia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, etc. (even Michigan). They have Republican governors to clean things up. It is sad that history tells us that once clean, they seem to drift back into their political give-a-ways and financial crisis.
Some of the Republican governors are not polling well even though they have turned their Liberal states around, like Wisconsin, Florida, and Ohio. Why?
To clean things up you have to say no to spending. This pisses people off and enables the Dems to demagogue big time. "Republicans cut spending so they can hurt women, children, education, air, water, poor people minorities, etc. Republicans, of course, do this so they can take care of their rich friends." Ever heard this before?
Hope this helps with your kin. Seems like every family has at least one that is wandering in the wilderness, off the reservation, or just plain ornery. Next time you are at the Cafe ask me about my cousin Looey.
Sincerely Yours,
Billy Roy Mitchum
Chairman of the Board
Hubbard City Cafe
Chairman of the Board
Hubbard City Cafe
Monday, September 17, 2012
The Obama Battlecry: DISENGAGE
dis·en·gage
Time and again I hear real folks say, "Are we insane? Do people really believe the crap coming out of the Obama Administration and the mainstream press (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, NY Times, Washington Post, etc.)?" What crap? Crap like, "A small mob was protesting a really bad video made in the USA outside the American Libyan Consulate and it turned ugly when the small mob lost control and took their weapons (everyone in Libya has weapons) and murdered our Ambassador and three others despite the heroic efforts of the Libyan security guards to fight the mob off. These brave Libyan security guards then carried the Ambassadors body to the hospital but it was too late." None other than Susan Rice, our esteemed leader in the United Nations was putting out that crap this weekend. Obviously she was auditioning for Hillary Clinton's servitude when Hillary retires soon to become the loving wife and mother AGAIN. Gosh the awful price she has paid to serve her country and the time it has taken from her family life provide the perfect example of those who dedicate their lives to Liberal Causes like destroying out nation.
The SAD TRUTH is many Americans agree with the Obama strategy to 'release or disconnect from our obligations, pledges, and entanglements' around the world. These completely fabricated stories do support these people's hopes and wishes (besides they will say all politicians lie when confronted with the facts). And trust me, if the facts on these murders ever come public no one will be able to defend the lies that are being spewed.
This posting isn't about the details of the latest Obama fiasco. It is about the BIG PICTURE. In other postings we have discussed Obama's driven commitment to diminish, if not to destroy, the USA culturally, economically, and internationally. How does he plan to accomplish this internationally in only 8 years? By DISENGAGEMENT. Many Americans are understandably weary. Who isn't weary of the mess Obama has made of our foreign affairs and world leadership?
What do the polling numbers say about likely voter's views regarding the Middle East? The numbers according to Rasmussen: "The majority (58%) of all voters continue to believe the United States should leave things alone in the Islamic world. Twenty-five percent (25%) disagree and think America should do more to encourage the growth of democracy in Islamic nations. Sixteen percent (16%) are not sure. This mirrors findings in surveys for the past 18 months as protests during the so-called 'Arab Spring' led to the overthrow of longtime dictators in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia."
The current Libyan mess also highlighted a debate about free speech in the US. Rasmussen polled this issue as well, " Voters overwhelmingly rate protecting freedom of speech more important than not offending other nations and cultures despite claims that the latest outbreak of anti-American violence in the Middle East is due to a YouTube video that mocks Islam. Seventy-two percent (72%) of Likely U.S. Voters believe it is more important for the United States to guarantee freedom of speech. Only 15% consider it more important for the United States to make sure that nothing is done to offend other nations and cultures. Thirteen percent(13%) are undecided."
And what about the constant messaging on mainstream media that Americans give Obama a 10-15 point lead in the polls over Romney regarding his ability to lead our foreign affairs? The truth, "Voters give a slight edge to President Obama over Mitt Romney – 48% to 45% - when asked who they trust more when it comes to handling events in the Middle East. But there’s a wide partisan difference of opinion on the question. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of Democrats have more confidence in the president, while 82% of Republicans and a plurality (47%) of voters not affiliated with either of the major parties express more faith in Romney. Forty-four percent (44%) of all voters give good or excellent marks to the way the Obama administration has responded to the situation in Libya where the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were murdered last week. Thirty-four percent (34%) rate the administration’s performance as poor. Again, predictably, while 74% of Democrats give the Obama administration positive marks for its handling of the Libya crisis, just 18% of GOP voters and 37% of unaffiliated agree." Predictably, 74% of the Dems were favorable? My gosh, our people are dead because of the way Obama has handled Libya!
What does this all mean? The fact that many Americans are tired of losing our precious young people in a part of the world that shows every sign of hating us and our way of life is very understandable. The question of whether Americans want to leave this part of the world alone or support Obama's Arab Spring movement to democracy (Muslim Brotherhood) gives voters a choice of two evils. This is exactly the choice we have if Obama is re-elected. I personally do not want one more single soldier to lose his or her life in support of Obama's DISENGAGEMENT STRATEGY. I SAY BRING THEM HOME TODAY IF OBAMA STAYS IN OFFICE!
Obama pulled out of Iraq on George Bush's announced schedule without insisting the US must have an influential role in insuring our efforts there were not wasted. Bush would have never pulled out under these conditions. Obama announced a surge in Afghanistan along with A DISENGAGEMENT DATE of December 31, 2014. This was an invitation to all Afghans to return to the control of the Taliban on January 1, 2015. Over 50 young soldiers have been murdered by "Afghan friendly terrorists" in the enforcement of Obama's strategy to hand security over the the Afghan's. It doesn't get any "stupider" than this. Obama's DISENGAGED leadership encouraging the terrorists movements in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and every other Middle East and Northern African nation has allowed Muslim Brotherhood control. Obama has DISENGAGED from every American ally in the Middle East by using an idiot pitch of calling them "Dictators who were suppressing their people. The majority of many of these nations are radical Muslims who are intent on killings all infidels. As stated before, they are a majority of wolves voting with sheep on what they will have for dinner. All Christians are sheep to these people.
And now Obama has DISENGAGED from Israel. He claims, "he has their backs" and will keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and yet he refuses to take any action to deter Iran. It is clear Obama plans to just get re-elected and wait it out (in many cases to DISENGAGE is just to wait it out) as Iran joins the new "Obama World". A world where, through his re-distribution plan, every nation has the same number of nuclear weapons. As he told us with the famous open mike, when he is re-elected, "he will have more flexibility". The flexibility he whispers is to disarm the US, to weaken any anti-missile shields, and to spread weapons to smaller nations around "Obama World".
The ironic truth is when the world is in economic turmoil and there are large evil forces wanting to destroy Christian and free world leaders Obama doesn't have to do much at all. The truth is Obama isn't capable of doing much at all. He can't fix anything. He can only break things. He can't engage in solutions. HE CAN, AND IS, DISENGAGING. When the only good and strong leader of the free world disengages, our young people always pay the price. Whether it is Pearl Harbor, Normandy, Viet Nam, or Libya, our precious young folks pay the price for appeasement and disengagement.
Every able-bodied, and able-minded, American must spread the word. No one can say, "We were not warned." No one can say, "We didn't realize things were that bad at the time." No one can say, "I just didn't want to get involved in politics or religion." We can't say it, because our grandchildren will not buy our excuses if Obama is elected to a second term.
This election is very "win able".
ARE YOU ENGAGED?
Jim
1. To release from something that holds fast, connects, or entangles. See Synonyms at extricate.
2. To release (oneself) from an engagement, pledge, or obligation.
v.intr.
To free or detach oneself; withdraw.
Time and again I hear real folks say, "Are we insane? Do people really believe the crap coming out of the Obama Administration and the mainstream press (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, NY Times, Washington Post, etc.)?" What crap? Crap like, "A small mob was protesting a really bad video made in the USA outside the American Libyan Consulate and it turned ugly when the small mob lost control and took their weapons (everyone in Libya has weapons) and murdered our Ambassador and three others despite the heroic efforts of the Libyan security guards to fight the mob off. These brave Libyan security guards then carried the Ambassadors body to the hospital but it was too late." None other than Susan Rice, our esteemed leader in the United Nations was putting out that crap this weekend. Obviously she was auditioning for Hillary Clinton's servitude when Hillary retires soon to become the loving wife and mother AGAIN. Gosh the awful price she has paid to serve her country and the time it has taken from her family life provide the perfect example of those who dedicate their lives to Liberal Causes like destroying out nation.
The SAD TRUTH is many Americans agree with the Obama strategy to 'release or disconnect from our obligations, pledges, and entanglements' around the world. These completely fabricated stories do support these people's hopes and wishes (besides they will say all politicians lie when confronted with the facts). And trust me, if the facts on these murders ever come public no one will be able to defend the lies that are being spewed.
This posting isn't about the details of the latest Obama fiasco. It is about the BIG PICTURE. In other postings we have discussed Obama's driven commitment to diminish, if not to destroy, the USA culturally, economically, and internationally. How does he plan to accomplish this internationally in only 8 years? By DISENGAGEMENT. Many Americans are understandably weary. Who isn't weary of the mess Obama has made of our foreign affairs and world leadership?
What do the polling numbers say about likely voter's views regarding the Middle East? The numbers according to Rasmussen: "The majority (58%) of all voters continue to believe the United States should leave things alone in the Islamic world. Twenty-five percent (25%) disagree and think America should do more to encourage the growth of democracy in Islamic nations. Sixteen percent (16%) are not sure. This mirrors findings in surveys for the past 18 months as protests during the so-called 'Arab Spring' led to the overthrow of longtime dictators in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia."
The current Libyan mess also highlighted a debate about free speech in the US. Rasmussen polled this issue as well, " Voters overwhelmingly rate protecting freedom of speech more important than not offending other nations and cultures despite claims that the latest outbreak of anti-American violence in the Middle East is due to a YouTube video that mocks Islam. Seventy-two percent (72%) of Likely U.S. Voters believe it is more important for the United States to guarantee freedom of speech. Only 15% consider it more important for the United States to make sure that nothing is done to offend other nations and cultures. Thirteen percent(13%) are undecided."
And what about the constant messaging on mainstream media that Americans give Obama a 10-15 point lead in the polls over Romney regarding his ability to lead our foreign affairs? The truth, "Voters give a slight edge to President Obama over Mitt Romney – 48% to 45% - when asked who they trust more when it comes to handling events in the Middle East. But there’s a wide partisan difference of opinion on the question. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of Democrats have more confidence in the president, while 82% of Republicans and a plurality (47%) of voters not affiliated with either of the major parties express more faith in Romney. Forty-four percent (44%) of all voters give good or excellent marks to the way the Obama administration has responded to the situation in Libya where the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were murdered last week. Thirty-four percent (34%) rate the administration’s performance as poor. Again, predictably, while 74% of Democrats give the Obama administration positive marks for its handling of the Libya crisis, just 18% of GOP voters and 37% of unaffiliated agree." Predictably, 74% of the Dems were favorable? My gosh, our people are dead because of the way Obama has handled Libya!
What does this all mean? The fact that many Americans are tired of losing our precious young people in a part of the world that shows every sign of hating us and our way of life is very understandable. The question of whether Americans want to leave this part of the world alone or support Obama's Arab Spring movement to democracy (Muslim Brotherhood) gives voters a choice of two evils. This is exactly the choice we have if Obama is re-elected. I personally do not want one more single soldier to lose his or her life in support of Obama's DISENGAGEMENT STRATEGY. I SAY BRING THEM HOME TODAY IF OBAMA STAYS IN OFFICE!
Obama pulled out of Iraq on George Bush's announced schedule without insisting the US must have an influential role in insuring our efforts there were not wasted. Bush would have never pulled out under these conditions. Obama announced a surge in Afghanistan along with A DISENGAGEMENT DATE of December 31, 2014. This was an invitation to all Afghans to return to the control of the Taliban on January 1, 2015. Over 50 young soldiers have been murdered by "Afghan friendly terrorists" in the enforcement of Obama's strategy to hand security over the the Afghan's. It doesn't get any "stupider" than this. Obama's DISENGAGED leadership encouraging the terrorists movements in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and every other Middle East and Northern African nation has allowed Muslim Brotherhood control. Obama has DISENGAGED from every American ally in the Middle East by using an idiot pitch of calling them "Dictators who were suppressing their people. The majority of many of these nations are radical Muslims who are intent on killings all infidels. As stated before, they are a majority of wolves voting with sheep on what they will have for dinner. All Christians are sheep to these people.
And now Obama has DISENGAGED from Israel. He claims, "he has their backs" and will keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and yet he refuses to take any action to deter Iran. It is clear Obama plans to just get re-elected and wait it out (in many cases to DISENGAGE is just to wait it out) as Iran joins the new "Obama World". A world where, through his re-distribution plan, every nation has the same number of nuclear weapons. As he told us with the famous open mike, when he is re-elected, "he will have more flexibility". The flexibility he whispers is to disarm the US, to weaken any anti-missile shields, and to spread weapons to smaller nations around "Obama World".
The ironic truth is when the world is in economic turmoil and there are large evil forces wanting to destroy Christian and free world leaders Obama doesn't have to do much at all. The truth is Obama isn't capable of doing much at all. He can't fix anything. He can only break things. He can't engage in solutions. HE CAN, AND IS, DISENGAGING. When the only good and strong leader of the free world disengages, our young people always pay the price. Whether it is Pearl Harbor, Normandy, Viet Nam, or Libya, our precious young folks pay the price for appeasement and disengagement.
Every able-bodied, and able-minded, American must spread the word. No one can say, "We were not warned." No one can say, "We didn't realize things were that bad at the time." No one can say, "I just didn't want to get involved in politics or religion." We can't say it, because our grandchildren will not buy our excuses if Obama is elected to a second term.
This election is very "win able".
ARE YOU ENGAGED?
Jim
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Obama and Hillary: Only In America
Obama and his press lackeys have no intentions of letting the 2012 911 CRISIS GO TO WASTE as they work to cover up their Middle East and Northern Africa policies. And besides, it takes the focus off Israel and Iran's nukes.
Today's Austin American Statesman has the following on their FRONT PAGE after explaining the wonderful things the Obama administration is doing to "avenge the killings":
"THE ROMNEY CAMPAIGN: Mitt Romney criticized Obama's handling of the killings in what Romney critics, including a few Republicans, called an unwarranted politicizing of an American foreign policy tragedy."
This was followed by an academic from the University of Texas, "As the investigation continues, there should be an unspoken agreement to restrain bipartisan interests. It is critical for Obama and others to not only condemn the attacks but also to stand united in support of Egypt as not to fuel new opposition to the US. Romney's criticism was ill timed."
I've Got it!!! So everything will be OK if we will just chill out and let Obama investigate and take prudent and patient action as appropriate. But above all, we should take no action that in anyway reflects on the Libyan nor Egyptian leadership. Leaders THAT OBAMA HAS PUT INTO POWER BY LEADING FROM BEHIND IN SUPPORT OF THE GLORIOUS ARAB SPRING!!! The world out there is complex and little snags like this happen, right?
None other than Benjamin Franklyn warned us over 200 years ago about the ARAB SPRING. Old Ben said, "Democracy is like two wolves and one lamb voting to determine what they will have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb protesting the vote." Friends, whether we like it or not dictators (people like Qaddafi and Mubarak) in the Middle East are the sheep and radical Islamists are the wolves. Obama's leadership from behind in the support of the Arab Spring and continued support of these murderers are leading the world to an Armageddon. AND OBAMA KNOWS IT. HE IS RIGHT ON SCHEDULE IN DIMINISHING THE US COLONIALISTS MILITARILY. It is his third objective behind destroying the US economy and culturally (remember?)
Every action so far by Obama and Clinton has been deceiving. Their goal clearly is to sweep these events under the political rug while defending the regimes in Egypt and Libya who they helped put into power. And if they can make Romney look poliical and "un-American", that is a bonus. To admit that they made mistakes in supporting militant Islamists before the November election would be a disaster. So how did they go about the deception. Look at their first statements regarding Libya while remembering OBAMA HAS YET TO MENTION EGYPT AT ALL.
Clinton came out first to test the water with these lies:
" American and Libyan security personnel battled the attackers together." Where are the details supporting this statement? If we need to "aim before we fire" in an investigation shouldn't we investigate just what kind of security forces were assigned to our ambassador by both the US and Libya? How and why make this claim so early?
"But we must be clear-eyed, even in our grief. This was an attack by a small and savage group – not the people or Government of Libya. Everywhere Chris and his team went in Libya, in a country scarred by war and tyranny, they were hailed as friends and partners. And when the attack came yesterday, Libyans stood and fought to defend our post. Some were wounded. Libyans carried Chris’ body to the hospital, and they helped rescue and lead other Americans to safety. And last night, when I spoke with the President of Libya, he strongly condemned the violence and pledged every effort to protect our people and pursue those responsible." Seems like Hillary has a clear grasp of exactly what happened doesn't she. Which of our 'friends and partners' formed this 'small and savage group'? My prediction is if the details of this incident ever become public we will find this is one of the biggest lies either of the Clinton's ever told. We already know this was a well planned attack by a military group. Some or estimating as many as 50 well trained forces. The paper quotes terrorists who were interviewed after the murders. Other stories give sketchy details about moving the American's to a 'safe house'. How many American and Libyan security forces were killed in the 2-4 hour battle?
"The friendship between our countries, borne out of shared struggle, will not be another casualty of this attack." No matter what the facts nor who failed to protect our people, it is important not to embarress Obama and Hillary.
" We are working closely with the Libyan authorities to move swiftly and surely. We are also working with partners around the world to safeguard other American embassies, consulates, and citizens." Hillary, let's double our efforts now that 911 has passed. And by the way, why are we now moving two warships off the coast? Are we going to attack this 'small and savage group's' navy?
"And as long as there are those who would take innocent life in the name of God, the world will never know a true and lasting peace." It is not God, Hillary, it is Allah.
And then you have Obama's remarks which came after Hillary conditioned the press and before he flew off t campaign in Las Vegas:
"Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts. Here is the big Obama straddle. The US still respects all Muslim faiths and apologizes for offending Muslims with videos made by fictitious Jewish Americans. And of course, then he throws in the lead from behind statement about us standing with the world. The 911 attacks were not attacks on the world. The only united effort of the world is in killing lambs and replacing them with Islamic wolves behind the "leadership from behind" of Obama.
"Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died." I am almost speechles with this crap about the bonds with these murderers. Every Libyan is guilty until proven innocent for not protecting our Ambassador and his people in their country. OBAMA AND THE LIBYAN GOVERNMENT ARE REPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR DIPLOMATS----PERIOD. THEY FAILED AND OUR PEOPLE DIED.
In closing do you remember Hillary's gloating and crackling laughter when she viewed the video of Qaddiffi's body after his death? Remember her statement, "We came, we saw, he died." This was a statement from an incompetent inexperienced light weight fool, who attained her position through a horrible marriage, to become the Secretary of State of the Unitied States of America. A fiction writer could not make this up. Not only is it unbelieveable, it is too frightening to imagine. Nor could a fiction writer team this loser with someone more incompetent carrying the title of President of the United States who is even less qualified. And yet the American voters put them in office. Now people around the world are in the early stages of suffering that will only get worse if the moochers put these people back in office in November.
We ain't seen nuthin yet.
Jim
.
Today's Austin American Statesman has the following on their FRONT PAGE after explaining the wonderful things the Obama administration is doing to "avenge the killings":
"THE ROMNEY CAMPAIGN: Mitt Romney criticized Obama's handling of the killings in what Romney critics, including a few Republicans, called an unwarranted politicizing of an American foreign policy tragedy."
This was followed by an academic from the University of Texas, "As the investigation continues, there should be an unspoken agreement to restrain bipartisan interests. It is critical for Obama and others to not only condemn the attacks but also to stand united in support of Egypt as not to fuel new opposition to the US. Romney's criticism was ill timed."
I've Got it!!! So everything will be OK if we will just chill out and let Obama investigate and take prudent and patient action as appropriate. But above all, we should take no action that in anyway reflects on the Libyan nor Egyptian leadership. Leaders THAT OBAMA HAS PUT INTO POWER BY LEADING FROM BEHIND IN SUPPORT OF THE GLORIOUS ARAB SPRING!!! The world out there is complex and little snags like this happen, right?
None other than Benjamin Franklyn warned us over 200 years ago about the ARAB SPRING. Old Ben said, "Democracy is like two wolves and one lamb voting to determine what they will have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb protesting the vote." Friends, whether we like it or not dictators (people like Qaddafi and Mubarak) in the Middle East are the sheep and radical Islamists are the wolves. Obama's leadership from behind in the support of the Arab Spring and continued support of these murderers are leading the world to an Armageddon. AND OBAMA KNOWS IT. HE IS RIGHT ON SCHEDULE IN DIMINISHING THE US COLONIALISTS MILITARILY. It is his third objective behind destroying the US economy and culturally (remember?)
Every action so far by Obama and Clinton has been deceiving. Their goal clearly is to sweep these events under the political rug while defending the regimes in Egypt and Libya who they helped put into power. And if they can make Romney look poliical and "un-American", that is a bonus. To admit that they made mistakes in supporting militant Islamists before the November election would be a disaster. So how did they go about the deception. Look at their first statements regarding Libya while remembering OBAMA HAS YET TO MENTION EGYPT AT ALL.
Clinton came out first to test the water with these lies:
" American and Libyan security personnel battled the attackers together." Where are the details supporting this statement? If we need to "aim before we fire" in an investigation shouldn't we investigate just what kind of security forces were assigned to our ambassador by both the US and Libya? How and why make this claim so early?
"But we must be clear-eyed, even in our grief. This was an attack by a small and savage group – not the people or Government of Libya. Everywhere Chris and his team went in Libya, in a country scarred by war and tyranny, they were hailed as friends and partners. And when the attack came yesterday, Libyans stood and fought to defend our post. Some were wounded. Libyans carried Chris’ body to the hospital, and they helped rescue and lead other Americans to safety. And last night, when I spoke with the President of Libya, he strongly condemned the violence and pledged every effort to protect our people and pursue those responsible." Seems like Hillary has a clear grasp of exactly what happened doesn't she. Which of our 'friends and partners' formed this 'small and savage group'? My prediction is if the details of this incident ever become public we will find this is one of the biggest lies either of the Clinton's ever told. We already know this was a well planned attack by a military group. Some or estimating as many as 50 well trained forces. The paper quotes terrorists who were interviewed after the murders. Other stories give sketchy details about moving the American's to a 'safe house'. How many American and Libyan security forces were killed in the 2-4 hour battle?
"The friendship between our countries, borne out of shared struggle, will not be another casualty of this attack." No matter what the facts nor who failed to protect our people, it is important not to embarress Obama and Hillary.
" We are working closely with the Libyan authorities to move swiftly and surely. We are also working with partners around the world to safeguard other American embassies, consulates, and citizens." Hillary, let's double our efforts now that 911 has passed. And by the way, why are we now moving two warships off the coast? Are we going to attack this 'small and savage group's' navy?
"And as long as there are those who would take innocent life in the name of God, the world will never know a true and lasting peace." It is not God, Hillary, it is Allah.
And then you have Obama's remarks which came after Hillary conditioned the press and before he flew off t campaign in Las Vegas:
"Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts. Here is the big Obama straddle. The US still respects all Muslim faiths and apologizes for offending Muslims with videos made by fictitious Jewish Americans. And of course, then he throws in the lead from behind statement about us standing with the world. The 911 attacks were not attacks on the world. The only united effort of the world is in killing lambs and replacing them with Islamic wolves behind the "leadership from behind" of Obama.
"Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died." I am almost speechles with this crap about the bonds with these murderers. Every Libyan is guilty until proven innocent for not protecting our Ambassador and his people in their country. OBAMA AND THE LIBYAN GOVERNMENT ARE REPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR DIPLOMATS----PERIOD. THEY FAILED AND OUR PEOPLE DIED.
In closing do you remember Hillary's gloating and crackling laughter when she viewed the video of Qaddiffi's body after his death? Remember her statement, "We came, we saw, he died." This was a statement from an incompetent inexperienced light weight fool, who attained her position through a horrible marriage, to become the Secretary of State of the Unitied States of America. A fiction writer could not make this up. Not only is it unbelieveable, it is too frightening to imagine. Nor could a fiction writer team this loser with someone more incompetent carrying the title of President of the United States who is even less qualified. And yet the American voters put them in office. Now people around the world are in the early stages of suffering that will only get worse if the moochers put these people back in office in November.
We ain't seen nuthin yet.
Jim
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
