"Bill, the Bubble King, launched the Clinton's next idiot pitch with their goal clearly set to move their demented sex acts back into the White House. The scheme is an old one for the Clintons. It is to trap their Liberal opponents in deep left field and their Conservative opponents in deep right field while they give the false impression of planting themselves prudently right in the middle. Perfect timing here in 2011 as Obomb-us goes crazy trying to please his Communist base and the Republican candidates try to please their Tea Party supporters," obviously Butch has done some real deep thinking to believe he can match swords with James Carville, Paul Begala, and the other sleazes that surround the Clintons.
Billy Roy Mitcham (who is the featured performer at the Hubbard City High School Homecoming in a couple of weeks) entered this one pretty early since he really doesn't take to the Clinton crowd having a real tender heart in believing that young interns should date other young interns instead of playing adult games with dirty sleazy old men in the Oval Office of all places, "You must be talking about Bill's idiot pitch of all idiot pitches when he said last week that it was not a good time to raise taxes, even on the rich, nor was it a good time to cut government spending. Right down the middle in assuring everyone that we should just stop our fighting, wait it out, and everything will turn out just fine. What complete idiot wouldn't like to hear that? Like most idiot pitches it sounds great, but like most Clintonian statements it is just not true. This is coming from the lips of the greatest liar of all time. Don't want to step on your analysis, Butch, tell em why?"
"Gothcha covered BM. Let's look at it this way. Not a good time to cut spending, huh? America's ever-growing debt crisis is in the trillions -- more than $14 trillion, give or take a few billion and we are adding a mere $1.7 trillion or so every year Obama 'stays' in the White House. That's a lot of zeros, numbers so large they're sure to make Americans numb when trying to get their arms around what it means to them. But what would the federal debt crisis look like if you set it up as a household budget?
"A heck of a lot simpler, according to new figures from the Tea Party group, which estimates the government 'household' spends nearly twice as much as it takes in every year, has a credit card bill nearly seven times annual income and cuts back less than 2 percent of that spending in an effort to control the debt."
"The group looked at some key figures, mainly tax revenue, the current federal budget, debt and budget cuts, and divided each figure by $100 million, in an effort to break it down into simple terms that most Americans can comprehend. The group posted its findings online and came up with a household with an average family income of $21,700. But that 'family' spent nearly twice that -- $38,200 -- and has an existing credit card balance of a whopping $142,710. And if you look at the big spending cuts that they almost shut down the government arguing over, the family budget will be reduced by $385 (and they probably will find ways to not even make these cuts," Butch pretty much laid it out.
BM came back, "And here comes Big Bad Bill riding in on Hillary's back saving us all by saying 'it is just not a good time to cut back on our spending! So we add another measly $17 thousand to our credit card, we are still under $160 thousand. Hell maybe another Internet Bubble will come along and save us if we are just patient.' See why we call it an idiot pitch? Everybody knows Bill, and more so Hillary, are just as Liberal as Obomb-us and even more dangerous. Hillary was a Socialist long before Obomb-us. Her positions on social issues would further destroy families (definition of family, gay rights, government sponsored killing of the unborn, etc.) are as radical as the current Communists, and she would be more effective in implementing them. And of course the Clinton's would double down big time on Algore's Man Caused Global Warming Scam as a source of income on the side. Bill could make jillions with Hillary in the White House."
Mom had a question, "But wouldn't Bill get the economy going? I keep hearing that he was a genius in creating jobs, and he did balance our budget, and in fact, created a surplus."
BM loves Mom and her questions even more, "Great question, Maxine, but I've got some guitar tuning to do and Butch has his daily call with the Tea Party in ten minutes so let's hold the Clinton business record for our next java session. In fact, we need to get Scott Riddle, cattle baron/insurance tycoon/and gambler of major league renown, in on that discussion. I understand he got a real good taste of the Clinton economy."
This will give us something to think about, huh?
Jim
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Monday, September 26, 2011
Moochers March For Their Slice Of Obama Pie
We know there is a love affair between Obama and moochers based on mutual interest. What we don’t know is how many moochers Obama can create between now and November of 2012.
Never has Obama been more fired up than he was this past weekend when he spoke to the Black Caucus. He called for blacks to "get out of their house slippers and to put on their marching boots". Obama's rhetoric was a response to black leaders (Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson Lee) calling for Obama to give more handouts to their “community”. Instead of demanding Obama programs for growing the economy and putting people to work, they were asking, "You bailed out banks, wall street, and auto companies. Where is our bailout?"
This same weekend protesters continued to descend on Wall Street and occupy parts of it showing their rage over a financial system that they say favors the rich and powerful at the expense of ordinary citizens. Micah Chamberlain, 23, a line cook from Columbus, Ohio, who had hitchhiked to New York, said “There are millions of people in his country without jobs and 1 percent of the people have 99 percent of the money.” Looks like the strategy is to march until Obama gives everyone their fair share (1% of the people should have 1% of the money).
And Obama's people are just getting warmed up. It is clear to the most casual observer that the current President of the United States believes that our country has seen its best days. He feels strongly that we have peaked as an economic and political leader of the world. From this point forward he believes we must lower our standards for economic growth (or lack thereof), lower our standards for leadership in the world (or lack thereof), and lower our standards for employment and self sufficiency (or lack thereof), and lower our standards of liberty and freedom from government interference in our citizens lives.
How do we know this? Look at his proposals. It is evident that Obama has given up on creating jobs and growing our economy (actually he never intended to do so). The Obama jobs plan has little if anything to do with jobs. It pays people for not working. In Obama's plan the American people get permanent tax hikes that would enlarge the federal government to offset the cost of temporary jobs policies that would not create any jobs. The tax hikes in this plan are clearly more likely to destroy more jobs than the jobs policies would ever create.
So what is the Obama plan as he accepts, and in fact, accelerates the shrinking American way of life? He wants to take the shrinking pie and divide it more fairly. He defines fair as taking money from non-Obama voters and giving it to Obama voters. He would rather his people have a larger share of a smaller pie than to grow the pie that would provide more for all constituents. It is easier to REDISTRIBUTE when the ship is sinking then when times are good. All SOCIALIST leaders throughout history have known this.
How does Obama plan to accomplish this REDISTRIBUTION?
First Obama can pass REGULATIONS without having to deal with a pesky Congress. During President Obama's first 26 months in office, his Administration imposed 75 new major regulations, with reported costs to the private sector exceeding $40 billion. The annual cost of regulation--$1.75 trillion by one frequently cited estimate--represents twice the amount of individual income taxes collected last year.
Regulations are complex and boring to the American public making them a great way to punish your enemies and reward your voters.
Next comes the Obama takeover of 1/6 of the American economy. Obamacare is a perfect ploy to transfer money from doctors, nurses, insurance companies, and the American taxpayer to the Obama voter even if it does kill jobs and make those without jobs more dependent on government. Additionally Obamacare will destroy the quality of the health care system while increasing costs to the paying customer. Obama would rather give his voters free health care, even if it is inferior, then to force people to work and buy excellent health care at market prices.
Next comes BIG SPENDING, RUNAWAY DEFICITS, and TAX INCREASES.
President Obama's $787 billion stimulus was supposed to create jobs, but instead deficits mounted and economic growth is now stagnant. Who cares as long as you can transfer resources from the more productive private sector to the less productive government sector (Obama voters)? Who cares that government rarely receives good value for the dollars it spends as long as Obama can redistribute the nation’s wealth by providing tax dollars to favored constituencies. Obama’s new jobs plan? More of the same, but with huge tax increases on job creators.
Earlier this summer, businessman Steve Wynn said that the Obama Administration has been "the greatest wet blanket to business and progress and job creation in my lifetime." And when Investors Business Daily asked Home Depot co-founder Bernie Marcus, "What's the single biggest impediment to job growth today?" he replied, "The U.S. government." Business owners--those men and women who create jobs in America--know that the Obama Administration is the root cause of the stalled economy. However, Obama is way ahead of Wynn and Marcus. Obama has always known he was a job killer, and he doesn't care as long as he can take money from Marcus and Wynn and "redistribute it fairly to his moochers".
The American people are catching on to the first part of the puzzle. According to a new ABC News/Washington Post poll, 77 percent say the country is headed seriously off on the wrong track, and "Americans by a 2-1 margin, 34 percent to 17 percent, now say [the Obama] administration’s efforts have done more to harm rather than help the nation's economy." What the American people don't know yet is that Obama will intentionally slow the economy and create unemployment to accomplish his CLASS WARFARE GOALS OF REDISTRIBUTION.
In current polls Romney leads Obama by 2 points while Perry loses to Obama by 4 points. It looks like you can toss a coin as to whether Americans would like to return to a prosperous and growing nation or would rather stop the economic machine and take money from the achievers and give it "fairly" to the moochers.
Think about it,
Jim
Never has Obama been more fired up than he was this past weekend when he spoke to the Black Caucus. He called for blacks to "get out of their house slippers and to put on their marching boots". Obama's rhetoric was a response to black leaders (Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson Lee) calling for Obama to give more handouts to their “community”. Instead of demanding Obama programs for growing the economy and putting people to work, they were asking, "You bailed out banks, wall street, and auto companies. Where is our bailout?"
This same weekend protesters continued to descend on Wall Street and occupy parts of it showing their rage over a financial system that they say favors the rich and powerful at the expense of ordinary citizens. Micah Chamberlain, 23, a line cook from Columbus, Ohio, who had hitchhiked to New York, said “There are millions of people in his country without jobs and 1 percent of the people have 99 percent of the money.” Looks like the strategy is to march until Obama gives everyone their fair share (1% of the people should have 1% of the money).
And Obama's people are just getting warmed up. It is clear to the most casual observer that the current President of the United States believes that our country has seen its best days. He feels strongly that we have peaked as an economic and political leader of the world. From this point forward he believes we must lower our standards for economic growth (or lack thereof), lower our standards for leadership in the world (or lack thereof), and lower our standards for employment and self sufficiency (or lack thereof), and lower our standards of liberty and freedom from government interference in our citizens lives.
How do we know this? Look at his proposals. It is evident that Obama has given up on creating jobs and growing our economy (actually he never intended to do so). The Obama jobs plan has little if anything to do with jobs. It pays people for not working. In Obama's plan the American people get permanent tax hikes that would enlarge the federal government to offset the cost of temporary jobs policies that would not create any jobs. The tax hikes in this plan are clearly more likely to destroy more jobs than the jobs policies would ever create.
So what is the Obama plan as he accepts, and in fact, accelerates the shrinking American way of life? He wants to take the shrinking pie and divide it more fairly. He defines fair as taking money from non-Obama voters and giving it to Obama voters. He would rather his people have a larger share of a smaller pie than to grow the pie that would provide more for all constituents. It is easier to REDISTRIBUTE when the ship is sinking then when times are good. All SOCIALIST leaders throughout history have known this.
How does Obama plan to accomplish this REDISTRIBUTION?
First Obama can pass REGULATIONS without having to deal with a pesky Congress. During President Obama's first 26 months in office, his Administration imposed 75 new major regulations, with reported costs to the private sector exceeding $40 billion. The annual cost of regulation--$1.75 trillion by one frequently cited estimate--represents twice the amount of individual income taxes collected last year.
Regulations are complex and boring to the American public making them a great way to punish your enemies and reward your voters.
Next comes the Obama takeover of 1/6 of the American economy. Obamacare is a perfect ploy to transfer money from doctors, nurses, insurance companies, and the American taxpayer to the Obama voter even if it does kill jobs and make those without jobs more dependent on government. Additionally Obamacare will destroy the quality of the health care system while increasing costs to the paying customer. Obama would rather give his voters free health care, even if it is inferior, then to force people to work and buy excellent health care at market prices.
Next comes BIG SPENDING, RUNAWAY DEFICITS, and TAX INCREASES.
President Obama's $787 billion stimulus was supposed to create jobs, but instead deficits mounted and economic growth is now stagnant. Who cares as long as you can transfer resources from the more productive private sector to the less productive government sector (Obama voters)? Who cares that government rarely receives good value for the dollars it spends as long as Obama can redistribute the nation’s wealth by providing tax dollars to favored constituencies. Obama’s new jobs plan? More of the same, but with huge tax increases on job creators.
Earlier this summer, businessman Steve Wynn said that the Obama Administration has been "the greatest wet blanket to business and progress and job creation in my lifetime." And when Investors Business Daily asked Home Depot co-founder Bernie Marcus, "What's the single biggest impediment to job growth today?" he replied, "The U.S. government." Business owners--those men and women who create jobs in America--know that the Obama Administration is the root cause of the stalled economy. However, Obama is way ahead of Wynn and Marcus. Obama has always known he was a job killer, and he doesn't care as long as he can take money from Marcus and Wynn and "redistribute it fairly to his moochers".
The American people are catching on to the first part of the puzzle. According to a new ABC News/Washington Post poll, 77 percent say the country is headed seriously off on the wrong track, and "Americans by a 2-1 margin, 34 percent to 17 percent, now say [the Obama] administration’s efforts have done more to harm rather than help the nation's economy." What the American people don't know yet is that Obama will intentionally slow the economy and create unemployment to accomplish his CLASS WARFARE GOALS OF REDISTRIBUTION.
In current polls Romney leads Obama by 2 points while Perry loses to Obama by 4 points. It looks like you can toss a coin as to whether Americans would like to return to a prosperous and growing nation or would rather stop the economic machine and take money from the achievers and give it "fairly" to the moochers.
Think about it,
Jim
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
