Thursday, September 13, 2012

Obama and Hillary: Only In America

Obama and his press lackeys have no intentions of letting the 2012 911 CRISIS GO TO WASTE as they work to cover up their Middle East and Northern Africa policies.  And besides, it takes the focus off Israel and Iran's nukes.

Today's Austin American Statesman has the following on their FRONT PAGE after explaining the wonderful things the Obama administration is doing to "avenge the killings":

"THE ROMNEY CAMPAIGN:  Mitt Romney criticized Obama's handling of the killings in what Romney critics, including a few Republicans, called an unwarranted politicizing of an American foreign policy tragedy."

This was followed by an academic from the University of Texas, "As the investigation continues, there should be an unspoken agreement to restrain bipartisan interests.  It is critical for Obama and others to not only condemn the attacks but also to stand united in support of Egypt as not to fuel new opposition to the US.  Romney's criticism was ill timed."

I've Got it!!!  So everything will be OK if we will just chill out and let Obama investigate and take prudent and patient action as appropriate.  But above all, we should take no action that in anyway reflects on the Libyan nor Egyptian leadership.  Leaders THAT OBAMA HAS PUT INTO POWER BY LEADING FROM BEHIND IN SUPPORT OF THE GLORIOUS ARAB SPRING!!!  The world out there is complex and little snags like this happen, right?

None other than Benjamin Franklyn warned us over 200 years ago about the ARAB SPRING.  Old Ben said, "Democracy is like two wolves and one lamb voting to determine what they will have for dinner.  Liberty is a well armed lamb protesting the vote."  Friends, whether we like it or not dictators (people like Qaddafi and Mubarak) in the Middle East are the sheep and radical Islamists are the wolves.  Obama's leadership from behind in the support of the Arab Spring and continued support of these murderers are leading the world to an Armageddon.  AND OBAMA KNOWS IT.  HE IS RIGHT ON SCHEDULE IN DIMINISHING THE US COLONIALISTS MILITARILY.  It is his third objective behind destroying the US economy and culturally (remember?)

Every action so far by Obama and Clinton has been deceiving.  Their goal clearly is to sweep these events under the political rug while defending the regimes in Egypt and Libya who they helped put into power.  And if they can make Romney look poliical and "un-American", that is a bonus.  To admit that they made mistakes in supporting militant Islamists before the November election would be a disaster.  So how did they go about the deception.  Look at their first statements regarding Libya while remembering OBAMA HAS YET TO MENTION EGYPT AT ALL.

Clinton came out first to test the water with these lies:

" American and Libyan security personnel battled the attackers together."  Where are the details supporting this statement?  If we need to "aim before we fire" in an investigation shouldn't we investigate just what kind of security forces were assigned to our ambassador by both the US and Libya?  How and why make this claim so early?

"But we must be clear-eyed, even in our grief. This was an attack by a small and savage group – not the people or Government of Libya. Everywhere Chris and his team went in Libya, in a country scarred by war and tyranny, they were hailed as friends and partners. And when the attack came yesterday, Libyans stood and fought to defend our post. Some were wounded. Libyans carried Chris’ body to the hospital, and they helped rescue and lead other Americans to safety. And last night, when I spoke with the President of Libya, he strongly condemned the violence and pledged every effort to protect our people and pursue those responsible."  Seems like Hillary has a clear grasp of exactly what happened doesn't she.  Which of our 'friends and partners' formed this 'small and savage group'?  My prediction is if the details of this incident ever become public we will find this is one of the biggest lies either of the Clinton's ever told.   We already know this was a well planned attack by a military group.  Some or estimating as many as 50 well trained forces.  The paper quotes terrorists who were interviewed after the murders.  Other stories give sketchy details about moving the American's to a 'safe house'.  How many American and Libyan security forces were killed in the 2-4 hour battle?

"The friendship between our countries, borne out of shared struggle, will not be another casualty of this attack."  No matter what the facts nor who failed to protect our people, it is important not to embarress Obama and Hillary.

" We are working closely with the Libyan authorities to move swiftly and surely. We are also working with partners around the world to safeguard other American embassies, consulates, and citizens."  Hillary, let's double our efforts now that 911 has passed.  And by the way, why are we now moving two warships off the coast?  Are we going to attack this 'small and savage group's' navy? 

"And as long as there are those who would take innocent life in the name of God, the world will never know a true and lasting peace."  It is not God, Hillary, it is Allah.

And then you have Obama's remarks which came after Hillary conditioned the press and before he flew off t campaign in Las Vegas:

"Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.  Here is the big Obama straddle.  The US still respects all Muslim faiths and  apologizes for offending Muslims with videos made by fictitious Jewish Americans.  And of course, then he throws in the lead from behind statement about us standing with the world.  The 911 attacks were not attacks on the world.  The only united effort of the world is in killing lambs and replacing them with Islamic wolves behind the "leadership from behind" of Obama. 

"Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died."  I am almost speechles with this crap about the bonds with these murderers.  Every Libyan is guilty until proven innocent for not protecting our Ambassador and his people in their country.  OBAMA AND THE LIBYAN GOVERNMENT ARE REPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR DIPLOMATS----PERIOD.  THEY FAILED AND OUR PEOPLE DIED.

In closing do you remember Hillary's gloating and crackling laughter when she viewed the video of Qaddiffi's body after his death?  Remember her statement, "We came, we saw, he died."  This was a statement from an incompetent inexperienced light weight fool, who attained her position through a horrible marriage, to become the Secretary of State of the Unitied States of America.  A fiction writer could not make this up.  Not only is it unbelieveable, it is too frightening to imagine.  Nor could a fiction writer team this loser with someone more incompetent carrying the title of President of the United States who is even less qualified.  And yet the American voters put them in office.  Now people around the world are in the early stages of suffering that will only get worse if the moochers put these people back in office in November.

We ain't seen nuthin yet.



Sunday, September 9, 2012

The Commander in Chief is right on schedule?

Got a chance to catch up with Billy Roy Michum, unofficial semi-official chairman of the board of the one and only Hubbard City Cafe (a place where Ronald Reagan would have had coffee if he had been a serious coffee drinker of some renown).  I had a question regarding the high marks the polls, and supposedly the public, give Obama in his leadership of foreign affairs and American security, "BM, how is Obama doing and should he be getting the high marks?"

"Jim, you seem to be the only guy asking this question.  I think the President is right on schedule.  He is leading from behind and pushing the free world right over the WWIII cliff.  As anybody with a brain larger than an English pea knows, the skinny one aims to reduce our country to third world standards in three areas:  economically, culturally (includes the God stuff), and in world affairs (our leadership of the free world).  The truth is Obama has made more progress in diminishing us around the world than he has in the other two.  I honestly think we can recover faster economically once we send him back to Kenya or Indonesia or California or Chicago or one of those places."

"That's pretty harsh stuff.  How so, BM?"

"Just look at the progress he makes every week.  This week the Congress told Obama and Hillary if they didn't put the Haqqani, so called militants, on the terrorist list the Congress would take action.  This happened after many warnings to the administration, and this time they were given a deadline of next Monday.  Hillary acted on last Thursday to put them on the list which means they have ten days to get their money out of US banks or we will freeze the funds (big deal).  Obama and Hillary didn't want to take action because they wanted to negotiate with the Haqqani so Obama can pull American troops out by his 2014 committed date.  Remember he surged and announced his surrender date at the same time.  Well this weekend the Haqqani's tied a bomb to a 14 boy and killed 6 Afghan people including children near NATO headquarters."

"An Haqqani leader celebrated by announcing that he will launch 80-100 attacks on US troops because of Obama's action.  And of course, these radical Muslims would like nothing better than to sit down with Hillary and negotiate being the way their treat their women.  They would bitch slap her big time.  And who is this group Obama wants to negotiate with?  Here is what WIKIPEDIA says:

In late 2011, a 144-page book attributed to Sirajuddin Haqqani began circulating in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Described by Newsweek as a "manual for guerrillas and terrorists," the Pashto-language book details instructions on setting up a jihadi cell, receiving financing, recruiting and training. The manual advises recruits that parental permission is not necessary for jihad, that all debts should be paid before joining, and that suicide bombings and beheadings are allowed by Islam.

"Look we need to get our heads out of our rears.  Obama wants to claim these are moderate Muslims like the Taliban that he can work with.  Obama wants to pull out of Afghanistan, just like he did in Iraq, and leave it in the hands of his Muslim terrorist friends.  This sounds like an overstatement but if you believe Obama really is an 'anti neocolonialist' you must also believe he has things in the Middle East right on schedule.  Every time he takes credit for our peace in Iraq, I go crazy.  He pulled out on George Bush's schedule and claims he did it alone.  Of course, Bush would never have pulled out with out contingency plans and forces to insure our Iraq war was for nothing.  Iraq is closer to the Iranians today then they are the free world."

This wasn't the only news regarding the Obama/Hillary teams progress in destroying the free world.  Remember when skinny told the Russian, "I can be more flexible after the election."  Well Hillary pledged this week that the US, "will soon lift Cold War-era trade sanctions on Russia."  The same week Russia again rejected our calls for increased pressure on Syria and Iran.  Obama claims 'his' sanctions are working.  Could someone tell me how?"

"To net it out.  The Obama plans to strength all US enemies and to weaken the free world is right on schedule.  In the Middle East once Syria joins the Arab Spring and the Egyptian generals are overthrown our former allies are reduced to the Saudi's.  Obama's re-election will insure their fall and of course Israel will be toast.  And of course, Obama is working hard to disarm and reduce our military including our nuclear weaponry as Russia and China only grow stronger and more aggressive.  China is pushing in the far east to 'settle' territorial disputes which means they will start claiming their rights to take over countries in that part of the world.  Does anyone think Obama will push back?"

"The polls?  Sadly many folks agree with Obama that the US deserves a 'come down'.  Others are 'war weary' and just hope we can all get along.  If we don't bother anyone maybe they will just leave us alone.  Hitler, Pearl Harbor, and the Holocaust suggests that strategy hasn't worked for us so far."

Think about it,