The Founder's Plan for America Really Does Need "Progressive Change"

The founders drafted many "protective" provisions in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  None of the provisions were more important than those protecting INDIVIDUALS from MAJORITY RULE.  Their greatest fears in breaking away from European style monarchies were the threats posed to individual liberties from majority rule.

The founders knew these protections would be needed in a Democracy so basically they created a Republic instead.   A good bit of their foundation for government was in expressly protecting the rights of individuals to own property, for religious worship, against unreasonable searches, etc.  In addition they established safeguards such as states rights, requirements of 2/3s majorities, and divided powers among the three branches of government as other examples of their fear of big overreaching government.  What they didn't anticipate was that this nation would not only open their borders to illegal immigration but would elect an administration who would refuse to enforce the laws while violating their oaths to protect the Constitution.

So where are we?  We have just completed a census with more than frightening demographics.  A census in which more than half of children less than one year of age are minorities.  In Texas alone, more than 7 out of 10 children under age 1 are minorities.  In California it is 75%.  In Austin, Texas 48% of children under 5 years of age are Hispanic and only 39% are White.  There is no question that this trend will change the very nature of our country and culture as we have known it. 

And yet today, we have two branches of the government, Executive and US Senate, pushing for an amnesty program called "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" to create a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, most of which are Hispanic.  Clearly this legislation would only accelerate the trend to put the White majority into a minority position.

These demographic shifts place a huge burden on our weakened economy with more people suckling at the breast of the tax payer than any founder ever conceived.  Jobs at the lower end of the employment ladder, where the welfare recipients should be employed, are going to illegals instead.  We are creating a temporary society where poorer American Citizens don't have to take jobs that they are qualified to do because they can choose to take government entitlements instead.  A recently unemployed young male welfare recipient said, "He wasn't looking for a job, he was looking for a career".  His appearance and poor English were that of an uneducated person like most of the others in this particular, and long, welfare line.  Next door, the Employment line where those could find jobs, was unattended.  Many of those interviewed said they were there to get their "Obama Juice", that being money, food stamps, and other hand outs.

The more our uneducated underclass are given incentives to not work nor become educated, the more we use illegals to fill the gap, the more we put burdens on our bankrupted welfare state, the more we destroy the basic fabric of our nation.

Earlier the society was defined as temporary.  That is because the trend cannot last for long.  Why?  Because the momma pig being suckled will run out of MONEY.  That will happen when others refuse to loan her money to fund our over suckling.  She will go dry, and probably within 5-10 years if we continue down this same path.  More than likely the society will then turn to some lying impostor who claims he or she will provide something like HOPE AND CHANGE.  He or she will take dictatorial powers resembling a third world South American country (Cubans are still driving 55 Chevys, but they need a lot of work). 

Obama and those of like minds will have achieved their goal of DOWNSIZING THE USA FROM ITS FORMER POSITION AS A COLONIAL POWER.  Unlike Obama, the founders, who came here to escape colonialism, would have called their creation the DEMOCRATIC LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD AND MOST SUCCESSFUL SOCIAL EXPERIMENT IN HISTORY.

What is most sad about such a scenario is those who will suffer the most, as always, will be the poor and middle class who bought into the age old socialist propaganda that their problems are the result of capitalism, liberty, and free markets.

But there is an alternative. 

1.  Vote Obama and the Democratic Congress out in November.  Throw out Career Republican Rhinos. 
2.  Get the economy moving (we know exactly how to do that and have done it many times before in recovering from a recession:  see Ronald Reagan). 
3.  Close the borders and reform Immigration Laws.
4.  Shut down welfare programs and safety nets that do not make able bodied citizens work. 
5.  Insure that all laws encourage and support families instead of disadvantaging families. 
6.  Retain our world military leadership with the intent to protect and encourage free markets and liberty.  Call out those who enslave their citizens (again:  see Ronald Reagan and his Evil Empire strategy)  
7.  And lastly, explore Constitutional Amendments to strengthen Life, Liberty, Property, and Freedom of Religion rights.  "Progressive" change should strengthen the founder's vision of the American dream in the modern world, not destroy their intent.  Examine voting rights.  Some options might require property owenership or tax payments.  Today, we debate whether we can ask for an ID?

The alternative will not be easy.  It will take commitment, dedication, and hard work.  But mostly, it will take LEADERSHIP.  God will surely provide it, but we must make the request.  Say your prayers tonight.

Think about it,

Jim

Are the Mexican Cartels Afraid of the First Gay President?

As the free world follows the insane debate over our Skinny President's waffling views on some fabricated thing called gay marriage the Cafe in the City of Hubbard isn't buying in. Butch set the stage as usual, "Debating whether marriage should only be between one man and one woman is as sane as debating whether only women should give birth. Or if it is fair for only men to be able to impregnate a wife. Have we completely lost our minds? Marriage between one man and one woman is a natural and God given law.  Birds fly!  Fish swim under water!  Male dogs mark their territories!  Female dogs have puppies!  One man marries one woman and they form a family!   Period!  Debate over.  Move on!  Hell, I would rather Romney cut my hair off if it was too long, then have to marry Obama!"

Billy Roy piled on, "The same sex marriage debate is perfect for Obama because it is such a ridiculous concept the Liar-In-Chief can make it up as he goes. In 1996 when Obama ran for the Illinois State Senate he filled out a form for a Gay Newspaper questionnaire for candidates and said 'I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages'. In 2004 when he ran for the Senate he said, 'I am not a supporter of gay marriage as it has been thrown out. I think that marriage as in the minds of voters is a religious issue'."

"Then in 2008 when he ran for President, 'I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage'. He said same-sex marriage was against his religion and something that should be in the hands of churches rather than government. By October 2010 as President he acknowledged, 'I have been against same-sex marriage because of my understanding of traditional definitions. But I also think that attitudes evolve, including mine'. Then last week he said, 'I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to be married'.  Wow!  Well I've been evolving on big, fat guys being able to jump like bull frogs but it just hasn't happened for this cowboy yet."

"Same sex marriage is just like Obama. It is phony in its very nature. Obama thinks that if he just says something, it is then true. Saying two people of the same sex can be married just doesn't make it true. Marriage is a sacred union between only one man and only one woman with the intent of creating children and providing care for a natural family. My barn swallows even understand that. My barn swallows have not been able to 'evolve' because it takes God to make 'natural' changes not some bozo like what Time magazine calls the first gay president. Remember when they called Clinton the first black president. You know 'saying it' didn't make that true either. Clinton is still white except for that huge nose of his which seems to always glow like a big red neon sign.  The awful truth is Obama doesn't care one bit about any kind of marriage, he just cares about downsizing the mean old USA, and destroying the concept of the family is the foundation of this great country."

"And while this stupid crap is going on there is a little item in the paper about 47 bodies found in Mexico on a popular route from Central America to Texas with their arms, hands, feet, and heads amputated. The bodies are unidentified and believed to be kidnapped citizens. And get this, IT IS THE FOURTH MASSACRE THIS MONTH. The UN backed by US air power overthrew the Libyan leader, Qaddafi, and slaughtered his military for far less than this. The fact that our political leaders allow open borders with millions of illegal immigrants including drug smugglers and terrorists pouring over our borders breeding the lawlessness that results in these massacres is criminal. Every American citizen should be totally ashamed. My guess is this problem would not be ranked in the top five issues the American voter cares about.  Just where is out shame?"

"What is the Liberal solution? COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM, which is a code name for providing amnesty to illegals which would give the Dem's a voting majority that would destroy the country as we know it.  All Libs care about is power."

Mom had a question, "I get that you would do more with this Mexican problem. Like what?"

"Hell, Maxine, I not only would put troops and drones on the border to close it down to drugs, terrorists, and illegals, but I would pursue them into Mexico if that is what it took to shut down the massacres and illegal drug trade. I just read that 70% of the Mexican population would welcome American assistance in combating the drug cartels. How can the rest of the world respect us if we allow this rotten situation just to the south of us?  We should tell the Mexican officials that either they clean the mess up or we will.  I would be patient though and give them a good week for their answer."

Well as they say, Billy Roy has a different way of looking at things then a lot of people.  Is Mexico on your worry screen?

Think about it,

Jim