These are busy times at the Hubbard City Cafe.
Butch Jackson posed the question to the Cafe, "Who would you waterboard to save your children from a horrible death like an exploding bomb in an airplane?"
Billy Roy responded with, "Obviously the light skinned orator and clean, President Obama, and his idiotic Attorney General, Eric Holder, will not waterboard captured Jihadists to save our children. I wonder if Obama would waterboard one of these punks if his own children were being held hostage? I bet he would in a manic minute if it were his daughters."
Butch Jackson retorted, "Hell, I would waterboard my own Mother if if would save the life of any ones' children. Wouldn't you?"
The silence that followed confirmed the hard, but right choice.
Billy Roy summed up, "Only idiotic liberal elite lawyers would rather protect the rights of Jihadist Scum than protect American children."
This conversation prompted an extension of the Horse Shit List:
Bailout: A process by which the Democrats after forcing companies (banks) to make bad business decisions (loans to Democratic voters who are poor credit risks) then loans the banks tax payer money to keep them from going bankrupt claiming that they are too large to fail and would destroy the entire world's economy. This action is soon followed by the banks improving their operations to the point of being able to pay back these government loans enabling the banks to then place huge taxes on the banks to pay for providing free health care to Democratic voters as a punishment for improving their operations too much.
Global Justice: The term is used by Obama-nites to provide Jihadist Terrorists who murder innocent men, women, children, and people of unknown genders with fancy lawyers and legal rights at the expense of the taxpayer resulting in protecting these cowardly Radical Muslim fanatics from having to share intelligence data that is essential to the protection of Americans and other people around the world. Non-Obama-nites, a huge majority and rapidly growing number of Americans, categorize this simply as "putting Terrorist's rights ahead of the safety of Americans". Obama-nites argue that by treating these people allegedly suspected of "man made disasters" fairly, fewer of them will be motivated to blow our asses up.
Finger Pointing: The term used when the Democratic Government screws up that keeps anyone from identifying who was responsible for the screw up. This process would be the opposite of a "whistle blower" program. While the President will accept screw ups, he "will not tolerate" finger pointing within his administration.
Partisan Politics: This term is used by Democratic Administrations when they screw up and Republicans "finger point" at them. It is considered by Democrats to be unfair.
Comprehensive Immigration Reform: This title is used for a legislative bill that would make illegal immigrants, who have broken American laws by illegally entering and remaining in the USA, legal. This bill would give these illegals voting rights and would give the Democrats the large majority of these millions of new voters and insure there elections in several states and nationally. Surprisingly, this legislation has been supported by President George Bush and Presidential Nominee John McCain before Republicans found out these two men were not real Republicans.
Comprehensive Health Care Reform or Comprehensive Anything: Comprehensive is a code name for any bill that is so complex no politician can read it nor any voter can understand it. All of the bills are aimed at the Federal Government taking over whatever is being reformed.
Global Warming and Climate Change: The folks at the Cafe have no idea in Hell what these terms mean other than the obvious. The World warms (and cools), and climates change four times a year probably tied to the seasons.
Additions are welcome,
Jim
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Surprise, Surprise: The Story Behind Obama's Presidency
Letter to: The Hubbard City Cafe
From: Jim Hammock
What a surprise? Even Harry Reid thought the Democrats could elect a candidate to the office of the President of the United States if he was a "good orator, light skinned, and did not speak using a Negro dialect, except when he wanted to". Remember when a political analyst as astute as old Joe Biden said, "I mean, you got the first sort of mainstream African American who's articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
Wow, clean?
Notice no discussion nor concerns about the candidate's experience, ethics, leadership qualities, or even views concerning national or international issues. No concerns about the possibility that the candidate might be a socialist, a man of black militant faith, has an obvious Islamic background and education, no questions even about his ability to prove his citizenship, no investigation into close connections to organizations like ACORN or other "Social Justice" movements, nor a strong desire to completely "transform" the US economy by re-distributing wealth from the current stake holders to those chosen by the "chosen one". No concerns were exposed about the candidate exhibiting all the signs of someone with a pathological Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Hell, the guy has had more names than a New Orleans lap dancer.
In today's political arena all of those pesky little flaws and details can be managed. Particularly if Candidate Obama follows someone in office who has been crucified by the press and the opposing party for a good 7 of his 8 years. Particularly if he is running against someone as unattractive as Hillary Clinton who is threatening the nation with 4 more years of Bill staining the oval office. Particularly if he runs against a John McCain who is such a gentleman and patriot that he believes it would be disloyal to bring up any of these little uncomfortable topics that might disrupt the civil discourse of the campaign. Best to keep it positive and at the 60,000-100,000 foot level as not to drag voters into too many boring details.
Well, that's what happened, and now we see what we have. The American voters closed their eyes and shed years of racial guilt by electing a nice young black couple with two beautiful children to the highest office in the most powerful nation of the world.
Man, if it weren't for those pesky little flaws and details this would be such a great fictional story. Yeah, if it weren't for the parts that are real: things like our economy, security, and freedom.
Think about it,
Jim
From: Jim Hammock
What a surprise? Even Harry Reid thought the Democrats could elect a candidate to the office of the President of the United States if he was a "good orator, light skinned, and did not speak using a Negro dialect, except when he wanted to". Remember when a political analyst as astute as old Joe Biden said, "I mean, you got the first sort of mainstream African American who's articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
Wow, clean?
Notice no discussion nor concerns about the candidate's experience, ethics, leadership qualities, or even views concerning national or international issues. No concerns about the possibility that the candidate might be a socialist, a man of black militant faith, has an obvious Islamic background and education, no questions even about his ability to prove his citizenship, no investigation into close connections to organizations like ACORN or other "Social Justice" movements, nor a strong desire to completely "transform" the US economy by re-distributing wealth from the current stake holders to those chosen by the "chosen one". No concerns were exposed about the candidate exhibiting all the signs of someone with a pathological Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Hell, the guy has had more names than a New Orleans lap dancer.
In today's political arena all of those pesky little flaws and details can be managed. Particularly if Candidate Obama follows someone in office who has been crucified by the press and the opposing party for a good 7 of his 8 years. Particularly if he is running against someone as unattractive as Hillary Clinton who is threatening the nation with 4 more years of Bill staining the oval office. Particularly if he runs against a John McCain who is such a gentleman and patriot that he believes it would be disloyal to bring up any of these little uncomfortable topics that might disrupt the civil discourse of the campaign. Best to keep it positive and at the 60,000-100,000 foot level as not to drag voters into too many boring details.
Well, that's what happened, and now we see what we have. The American voters closed their eyes and shed years of racial guilt by electing a nice young black couple with two beautiful children to the highest office in the most powerful nation of the world.
Man, if it weren't for those pesky little flaws and details this would be such a great fictional story. Yeah, if it weren't for the parts that are real: things like our economy, security, and freedom.
Think about it,
Jim
Friday, January 8, 2010
Obama Sabotages US Intelligence
Billy Roy Mitchum, local Merle Haggard type country and western singer, thinks the President was a day late and dollar short in accepting responsibility for the performance of our intelligence community as demonstrated by the Christmas Day Jihadist Bomber, "After using every kind of wiggle his people could think of, including saying the system worked, finally our leader after two weeks decided to try the old 'it's my fault' trick. The way bigger problem is that Obama doesn't have a clue as to what he has done wrong nor how to fix much less manage anything, and particularly something this complex and important."
BR then looked to Butch Jackson, local owner of all statictics and historian of some local fame, for confirmation. Butch pulled from his pocket a little read crumpled print out of an L. A. Times article published just a few short months after the Obama Administration had started the destruction (he says transformation) of the American dream and began to read:
"FBI planning a bigger role in terrorism fight
Bureau agents will gather evidence to ensure that criminal prosecutions of alleged terrorists are an option. The move is a reversal of the Bush administration's emphasis on covert CIA actions.
May 28, 2009Josh Meyer
WASHINGTON — The FBI and Justice Department plan to significantly expand their role in global counter-terrorism operations, part of a U.S. policy shift that will replace a CIA-dominated system of clandestine detentions and interrogations with one built around transparent investigations and prosecutions.
Under the "global justice" initiative, which has been in the works for several months, FBI agents will have a central role in overseas counter-terrorism cases. They will expand their questioning of suspects and evidence-gathering to try to ensure that criminal prosecutions are an option, officials familiar with the effort said."
After a stunning pause Butch said, "This is only one of many things, including allowing Holder (the Attorney General) to investigate CIA interrogations, that Obama has done to completely neuter our intelligence community. The liberal elites hate the military, and they hate the intelligence organizations even more. Now as the President's Preacher Rev. Wright says 'the chickens are coming home to roost', and there is chicken shit all over the White House."
Scotty Andersen, local summarizer of wisdom, wrapped it up, "This little article about the CIA is just one of hundreds of stupid things this bunch has done and is doing. This country has a real big shovel and can dig out of most anything, but I'll tell you what, we better start digging damn soon."
Think about it,
Jim
BR then looked to Butch Jackson, local owner of all statictics and historian of some local fame, for confirmation. Butch pulled from his pocket a little read crumpled print out of an L. A. Times article published just a few short months after the Obama Administration had started the destruction (he says transformation) of the American dream and began to read:
"FBI planning a bigger role in terrorism fight
Bureau agents will gather evidence to ensure that criminal prosecutions of alleged terrorists are an option. The move is a reversal of the Bush administration's emphasis on covert CIA actions.
May 28, 2009Josh Meyer
WASHINGTON — The FBI and Justice Department plan to significantly expand their role in global counter-terrorism operations, part of a U.S. policy shift that will replace a CIA-dominated system of clandestine detentions and interrogations with one built around transparent investigations and prosecutions.
Under the "global justice" initiative, which has been in the works for several months, FBI agents will have a central role in overseas counter-terrorism cases. They will expand their questioning of suspects and evidence-gathering to try to ensure that criminal prosecutions are an option, officials familiar with the effort said."
After a stunning pause Butch said, "This is only one of many things, including allowing Holder (the Attorney General) to investigate CIA interrogations, that Obama has done to completely neuter our intelligence community. The liberal elites hate the military, and they hate the intelligence organizations even more. Now as the President's Preacher Rev. Wright says 'the chickens are coming home to roost', and there is chicken shit all over the White House."
Scotty Andersen, local summarizer of wisdom, wrapped it up, "This little article about the CIA is just one of hundreds of stupid things this bunch has done and is doing. This country has a real big shovel and can dig out of most anything, but I'll tell you what, we better start digging damn soon."
Think about it,
Jim
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Cafe Publishes First Horse Shit List
A raging debate about whether there is a semi-major difference between Bull Shit and Horse Shit resulted in the following: The almost unanimous consensus appears to be that Bull Shit is the result of untruths, lies, and major exaggerations. Whereas, Horse Shit is the direct result of crazy, ridiculous, and mostly completely stupid utterances, phrases, or terms.
The first Horse Shit List is short, powerful, and smells about right.
Man Caused Disasters: Term used by Democrats when people of the Muslim faith take action to slaughter, mutilate, and maim completely innocent Non-Muslims (Infidels) by having young and sometimes retarded young people take suicidal actions with the promise of gaining a ticket to an Islamic paradise. These actions are known as Terrorist Acts by non-Democrats.
No Smoking Gun: Term used by Democrats after they fail to stop a terrorist attack (Fort Hood, Detroit, etc.). The smoke from the ashes of the World Trade Twin Towers would be a "smoking gun", after which law enforcement and defense lawyers can go to work tracking down the "alleged perpetrators" and protecting their rights.
Alleged: Term used to describe an accused perpetrator up until the time the American Legal System finishes its process. Until that time the perpetrator is an alleged criminal. For example the Fort Hood shooter will be "alleged" for several years until he recovers from his wounds and is able to go through the legal process which will include many psychological tests to insure his mental health. This process will takes years and millions of tax payer $$$$s in the process of protecting the shooter's rights.
Sanctions: Actions by multiple countries (usually US and European) to take economic measures against a country who is building nuclear weapons and vowing to eliminate other countries (usually Israel). These actions always have no effect whatsoever since other countries (usually Russia and China) counter the economic measures. The only thing more useless is to Threaten Sanctions (which we have been doing with the Iranians for years).
Think about it and click comment to add your favorites to the list,
Jim
The first Horse Shit List is short, powerful, and smells about right.
Man Caused Disasters: Term used by Democrats when people of the Muslim faith take action to slaughter, mutilate, and maim completely innocent Non-Muslims (Infidels) by having young and sometimes retarded young people take suicidal actions with the promise of gaining a ticket to an Islamic paradise. These actions are known as Terrorist Acts by non-Democrats.
No Smoking Gun: Term used by Democrats after they fail to stop a terrorist attack (Fort Hood, Detroit, etc.). The smoke from the ashes of the World Trade Twin Towers would be a "smoking gun", after which law enforcement and defense lawyers can go to work tracking down the "alleged perpetrators" and protecting their rights.
Alleged: Term used to describe an accused perpetrator up until the time the American Legal System finishes its process. Until that time the perpetrator is an alleged criminal. For example the Fort Hood shooter will be "alleged" for several years until he recovers from his wounds and is able to go through the legal process which will include many psychological tests to insure his mental health. This process will takes years and millions of tax payer $$$$s in the process of protecting the shooter's rights.
Sanctions: Actions by multiple countries (usually US and European) to take economic measures against a country who is building nuclear weapons and vowing to eliminate other countries (usually Israel). These actions always have no effect whatsoever since other countries (usually Russia and China) counter the economic measures. The only thing more useless is to Threaten Sanctions (which we have been doing with the Iranians for years).
Think about it and click comment to add your favorites to the list,
Jim
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Why the American Public Must Mobilize in Support of the WAR
When all the smoke clears there are four major actions that the Hubbard City Cafe thinks Obama must, and probably will not, do in our WAR against terror:
1. Use ethnic profiling to screen potential terrorists. Terrorists have the following profile: name (my gosh half are named Mohammad), Muslim, ages 18-30, dark (skin, hair, and eyes), traveling traits (cash, no checked luggage, seating in strategic seat locations), and associations with suspicious nations and institutions (Middle East, Africa, UK, American Prisons, etc.). So why are we having Grandma take her shoes off for security checks when we should be strip searching travelers with the above profile. If Obama doesn't profile then he is more concerned with treating Muslims fairly than saving American lives.
2. Treat captured potential terrorists as Military Combatants. It's a WAR STUPID. No Miranda Rights, no civil lawyers, use interrogation techniques as needed, and play to WIN. Winning is the destruction of the Bad Guys (PERIOD). It is a battle of wills and commitment to victory. The nature of the fight says the WAR will go on for a long, long time. Obama and the Dems can not "pull out" of this WAR since the terroists will "follow us home".
3. Unleash and support the CIA. Force everyone to share information with the CIA, and at the same time, let the CIA share information on a selective basis. Understand that anything the FBI touches will be treated as a federal law enforcement issue instead of WAR. Anyone who reads a Vince Flynn novel understands why covert operations can not share information with the FBI, Congress, or local law enforcement except as needed. Covert intelligence is the key to victory in this WAR.
4. Punish any nation or organization that provides a sanctuary for terrorists. Punishing does not mean nation building. We do not have the resources to cure all the problems in Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Iran, etc. (note Iraq is not on the list as our presence there is strategic in keeping the Middle East a free market for 70% of the world's oil). Punishing means covert intelligence, strategic military strikes, economic punishment, support for regime changes, and condemnation.
This action includes Islamic religious organizations. This WAR will end when the Muslims understand that their radical elements can not win and are hurting so called moderate Muslims around the world. Indeed if the Islamic religion is a religion of peace then Muslims must police Islamic Extremists for the good of all. Moderate Muslims must be forced to take sides.
And yet Eric Holder, Obama's Attorney General and Chief Law Enforcer, thinks we are threatened more by radicalized US Citizens, "What we've seen in the recent past, I think, is an indication of one of the things that we're going to have to be most concerned about in the future, this self-radicalization of American citizens or people who reside in the United States. They have too often come under the influence of people who have misinterpreted Islam." Is this not a Muslim sympathizer? Who is brainwashed, American Citizens or Obama/Holder?
The Cafe predicts Obama will completely whiff on the first three issues, and at best, just stick his ugly toe in the fourth action. They feel Dick Cheney is doing the best job of calling out Obama on these issues and his is a fairly lonely voice. The public must mobilize and the sooner the better.
Lets do more than just think about it,
Jim
1. Use ethnic profiling to screen potential terrorists. Terrorists have the following profile: name (my gosh half are named Mohammad), Muslim, ages 18-30, dark (skin, hair, and eyes), traveling traits (cash, no checked luggage, seating in strategic seat locations), and associations with suspicious nations and institutions (Middle East, Africa, UK, American Prisons, etc.). So why are we having Grandma take her shoes off for security checks when we should be strip searching travelers with the above profile. If Obama doesn't profile then he is more concerned with treating Muslims fairly than saving American lives.
2. Treat captured potential terrorists as Military Combatants. It's a WAR STUPID. No Miranda Rights, no civil lawyers, use interrogation techniques as needed, and play to WIN. Winning is the destruction of the Bad Guys (PERIOD). It is a battle of wills and commitment to victory. The nature of the fight says the WAR will go on for a long, long time. Obama and the Dems can not "pull out" of this WAR since the terroists will "follow us home".
3. Unleash and support the CIA. Force everyone to share information with the CIA, and at the same time, let the CIA share information on a selective basis. Understand that anything the FBI touches will be treated as a federal law enforcement issue instead of WAR. Anyone who reads a Vince Flynn novel understands why covert operations can not share information with the FBI, Congress, or local law enforcement except as needed. Covert intelligence is the key to victory in this WAR.
4. Punish any nation or organization that provides a sanctuary for terrorists. Punishing does not mean nation building. We do not have the resources to cure all the problems in Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Iran, etc. (note Iraq is not on the list as our presence there is strategic in keeping the Middle East a free market for 70% of the world's oil). Punishing means covert intelligence, strategic military strikes, economic punishment, support for regime changes, and condemnation.
This action includes Islamic religious organizations. This WAR will end when the Muslims understand that their radical elements can not win and are hurting so called moderate Muslims around the world. Indeed if the Islamic religion is a religion of peace then Muslims must police Islamic Extremists for the good of all. Moderate Muslims must be forced to take sides.
And yet Eric Holder, Obama's Attorney General and Chief Law Enforcer, thinks we are threatened more by radicalized US Citizens, "What we've seen in the recent past, I think, is an indication of one of the things that we're going to have to be most concerned about in the future, this self-radicalization of American citizens or people who reside in the United States. They have too often come under the influence of people who have misinterpreted Islam." Is this not a Muslim sympathizer? Who is brainwashed, American Citizens or Obama/Holder?
The Cafe predicts Obama will completely whiff on the first three issues, and at best, just stick his ugly toe in the fourth action. They feel Dick Cheney is doing the best job of calling out Obama on these issues and his is a fairly lonely voice. The public must mobilize and the sooner the better.
Lets do more than just think about it,
Jim
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Got A Big Question? Ask the Cafe.
When I get really confused I submit questions in writing to the Hubbard City Cafe
Question: Why can't obama and the Dems get aggressive in pursuing Jihadist Radical Islamic Terrorists or even say the words, War on Terror?
Cafe's Answer: It is a lawyer problem. Our 12/12/09 blog addressed the nation's lawyer problem such as, "Barack Obama is a lawyer. As are Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, John Edwards , Elizabeth Edwards, and every Democrat nominee since 1984 went to law school (although surprise, surprise AlGore did not graduate). Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Look at the so called leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress: Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are lawyers."
Specifically, if Obama calls this a WAR then he has to admit the jihadist cowardly slime balls we apprehend are COMBATANTS rather than ALLEGED PERPS. Lawyers don't fight wars, they finagle the legal systems. Voters in 2008 put the lawyers in charge. They are changing the system and we are hoping the CIA and military are insubortinate until we can get the lawyers out of office.
The American public have it right according to the latest Rasmussen poll. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of U.S. voters say waterboarding and other aggressive interrogation techniques should be used to gain information from the terrorist who attempted to bomb the airliner on Christmas Day.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 30% oppose the use of such techniques, and another 12% are not sure.
Seventy-one percent (71%) of all voters think the attempt by the Nigerian Muslim to blow up the airliner as it landed in Detroit should be investigated by military authorities as a terrorist act. Only 22% say it should be handled by civilian authorities as a criminal act, as is currently the case.
Meanwhile, in the Obama Administration, protecting the rights of terrorists has been more important than protecting the lives of Americans. Lawyers understand "rights" not national security. These same people have even convinced a large segment of the American public that Health Care is a "right". Anything deemed a "right" automatically puts the lawyers in charge. Got it?
Question #2: Does anyone know what is our real strategy in Afghanistan?
Answer: NO.
The confusions as to intentions, strategies and exit timing started immediately after the so called president's Dec. 1 speech, and have gotten dangerously worse in the ensuing month.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, even Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Chairman of Joint Chiefs Adm. Mike Mullins, and the top generals all said we were there to win and the July 2011 exit date was conditional on whether enough had been accomplished by then.
Meanwhile, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs, adviser David Axelrod, Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, Vice President Joe Biden and the president all indicated July 2011 was real, and senior White House sources said "winning" was not an objective. In fact General McChrystal has been ordered not to use the term "Defeat the Taliban".
Obama, like a snake, will slither between these two positions. Meanwhile, our troops have no clear mission. Are our heroic boys and girls risking their lives to WIN a WAR or to position an Obama political pull out?
It hurts to think about it,
Jim
Question: Why can't obama and the Dems get aggressive in pursuing Jihadist Radical Islamic Terrorists or even say the words, War on Terror?
Cafe's Answer: It is a lawyer problem. Our 12/12/09 blog addressed the nation's lawyer problem such as, "Barack Obama is a lawyer. As are Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, John Edwards , Elizabeth Edwards, and every Democrat nominee since 1984 went to law school (although surprise, surprise AlGore did not graduate). Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Look at the so called leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress: Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are lawyers."
Specifically, if Obama calls this a WAR then he has to admit the jihadist cowardly slime balls we apprehend are COMBATANTS rather than ALLEGED PERPS. Lawyers don't fight wars, they finagle the legal systems. Voters in 2008 put the lawyers in charge. They are changing the system and we are hoping the CIA and military are insubortinate until we can get the lawyers out of office.
The American public have it right according to the latest Rasmussen poll. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of U.S. voters say waterboarding and other aggressive interrogation techniques should be used to gain information from the terrorist who attempted to bomb the airliner on Christmas Day.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 30% oppose the use of such techniques, and another 12% are not sure.
Seventy-one percent (71%) of all voters think the attempt by the Nigerian Muslim to blow up the airliner as it landed in Detroit should be investigated by military authorities as a terrorist act. Only 22% say it should be handled by civilian authorities as a criminal act, as is currently the case.
Meanwhile, in the Obama Administration, protecting the rights of terrorists has been more important than protecting the lives of Americans. Lawyers understand "rights" not national security. These same people have even convinced a large segment of the American public that Health Care is a "right". Anything deemed a "right" automatically puts the lawyers in charge. Got it?
Question #2: Does anyone know what is our real strategy in Afghanistan?
Answer: NO.
The confusions as to intentions, strategies and exit timing started immediately after the so called president's Dec. 1 speech, and have gotten dangerously worse in the ensuing month.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, even Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Chairman of Joint Chiefs Adm. Mike Mullins, and the top generals all said we were there to win and the July 2011 exit date was conditional on whether enough had been accomplished by then.
Meanwhile, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs, adviser David Axelrod, Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, Vice President Joe Biden and the president all indicated July 2011 was real, and senior White House sources said "winning" was not an objective. In fact General McChrystal has been ordered not to use the term "Defeat the Taliban".
Obama, like a snake, will slither between these two positions. Meanwhile, our troops have no clear mission. Are our heroic boys and girls risking their lives to WIN a WAR or to position an Obama political pull out?
It hurts to think about it,
Jim
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Drunken Baucus Disqualified as Legitimate Idiot
The Cafe is inundated with nominations and voting activity regarding their "Idiot's List". While many of the suggestions are valid and will be considered, Billy Roy has determined some additional rules need to be established.
First ruling is that a candidate's idiocy can not be artificially enhanced by foreign substances such as adult beverages or illegal drugs. Billy Roy says some of the Cafe's brethren in Montana are campaigning very hard to get Senator Max Baucus on the top ten list. As you probably recall Max authored the Democrats Health Care Reform Bill before Harry Reid (#5 on the Idiot's List) rewrote the final bill. Billy Roy has ruled that Max has been disqualified due to the excessive use of massive adult beverages as demonstrated in the You Tube Link below. Just paste this in to your browser as the evidence is overwhelming.
The current top ten ranking of the "Idiot's List" :
1. Barry
2. Janet Napolitano
3. Robert Gibbs
4. Nancy Peolosi
5. Harry Reid
6. Maxine Waters
7. Barney Frank
8. Henry Waxman
9. Al Franken
10. Tie: Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Ben Nelson, and Joe Lieberman
Disqualified: Joe Biden (considered as an "Off the Chart" idiot and unrankable)
The debate continues so keep your cards and letters flowing,
Here is the Baucus You Tube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5Y9X5ggxzA
Jim
First ruling is that a candidate's idiocy can not be artificially enhanced by foreign substances such as adult beverages or illegal drugs. Billy Roy says some of the Cafe's brethren in Montana are campaigning very hard to get Senator Max Baucus on the top ten list. As you probably recall Max authored the Democrats Health Care Reform Bill before Harry Reid (#5 on the Idiot's List) rewrote the final bill. Billy Roy has ruled that Max has been disqualified due to the excessive use of massive adult beverages as demonstrated in the You Tube Link below. Just paste this in to your browser as the evidence is overwhelming.
The current top ten ranking of the "Idiot's List" :
1. Barry
2. Janet Napolitano
3. Robert Gibbs
4. Nancy Peolosi
5. Harry Reid
6. Maxine Waters
7. Barney Frank
8. Henry Waxman
9. Al Franken
10. Tie: Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Ben Nelson, and Joe Lieberman
Disqualified: Joe Biden (considered as an "Off the Chart" idiot and unrankable)
The debate continues so keep your cards and letters flowing,
Here is the Baucus You Tube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5Y9X5ggxzA
Jim
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
