Saturday, May 7, 2011

Notes Pertaining to Obama and Osama (and jobs)

Note 1:  Have you ever seen as many fictitious "official" announcements come out of a White House regarding any topic as you have seen with the killing of Osama?  This is a perfect example of mixing spinning, lying, politics, and a significant real event all managed by amateurs.  It is tough getting your story straight when you are masking a Puppet who was on the golf course and didn't have a clue what was going on.

Note 2:  Have you noticed that when this administration makes a good decision like using the CIA and Navy Seals rather than bombs, it was made by our courageous President all alone?  Yet when there are questionable decisions like whether to show pictures of Osama, it is Gates decision.  When Muslims complain about giving the evil Osama an honorable Muslim burial at sea, it is blamed on the advice of military intelligence and the Secretary of Defense as not to inflame Islamic Jihadists.  No wonder Gates can't wait to get out of this administration.  Every Obama cabinet member knows they are there for one major reason and that is to take the heat if something goes wrong leaving the image of Wonder Boy as clean as the driven snow. 

Note 3:  Have you noticed how upset we are that the Pakistanis have been harboring Al Queda's bin Laden yet we do not complain about them harboring Afghanistan's Taliban?  After all, it is the Taliban that kills American soldiers in Afghanistan, and Al Queda hasn't been in Afghanistan for years.  Why do we allow this?  Because Obama wants the Pakistanis to help him negotiate a settlement with the Taliban so that he can pull our troops out and declare a victory over Al Queda leaving the Afghanistan people at the mercy of the Taliban, again.  For their help with the Taliban Obama gives them Billions every year.

Note 4:  How do the Pakistanis get away with playing both sides, the US on one side and the Jihadists/Taliban on the other?  The answer is rarely even mentioned in the news and by analysts, INDIA.  This is the real enemy of Pakistan.  India  is larger and a  better armed foe on their border with a history of war against Pakistan.  And the US plays both sides, India and Pakistan.  We have trained the Pakistanis well how to straddle and play one against the other.  We have been doing it for years.

Note 5: Don't forget jobs.  How was the  jobs report celebrated by the Administration because they added over 200,000 new jobs (over 60,000 at MacDonald's who was given a deferment on implementing Obamacare)?  The same report said over 400,000 people filed new claims for unemployment taking the fake number from 8.8% to 9.0%.  The real number, including underemployed, is over 18%.

Think about it,

Jim

Thursday, May 5, 2011

As Yogi Said: "Islamic Jihad Is Not Over Till It's Over!"

Osama bin Laden is dead. 9ll is over. Let’s negotiate a settlement with the Taliban giving Afghanistan back, pull out of Iraq letting Iran have it, 'lead from behind' as a subordinate power to the UN and NATO, and slash our military budgets using the money for Obamacare.  Clearly this is the spin that puppet Obama and his handlers (Valery Jarret, Bill Daley, David Axelrod, and George Soros) will spin over the next few months.

The only lingering little problem is that Islamic Jihad (those dedicated to Sharia Law) is much larger than Al Qaeda. And even Al Qaeda is much larger than bin Laden. So terrorism is still very much alive and more harmful to our health around the globe than even those mean insurance companies that Obama hates the most.

The second lingering little problem is the declaration of victory does not solve our major strategic problems. They are:

Number 1: over 70% of the world’s oil reserves are in the Middle East and clearly our mission should be to do everything necessary to keep these markets “free” to trade around the world and out of the control of the Bad Guys (that President Obama would clearly be Islamic Jihadists).

Number 2: We must keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of the Bad Guys starting with Iran. If they take over Iraq after the Obama departure, they gain oil and are emboldened in their quest for nukes.

Number 3: The bin Laden episode puts Pakistan and their nukes on the strategic problem list. Simply put, whose side are they on? The Bad Guys or the non-Islamic Jihadist world (that would be Good Guys, Mr. President)?

Puppet Obama will play the Idiot Teleprompter Pitch as long as 51% of the voters are idiots. Muslim is a peaceful religion. We are not at war with Muslims. Al Qaeda is on the run, and we will continue to pursue them. Our mission in Iraq is over, and it was a mistake, and Obama got us out. Afghanistan was the good war, and we won by capturing bin Laden. We will let the Afghanistan people work out their issues with the Taliban. We will join our Global partners in organizations like the UN to bring peace to the world, and they will all love us for doing so. Energy independence from the Middle East means providing financial assistance to Algore and my green (like the color of money) friends (who will give me millions once I am out of office) while doing everything possible to drive up the price of oil in the US. We will work with Global Organizations to eventually make the World 'Nuke Free', and they will love us even more.

So now we just argue about the small stuff. Like how did we find bin Laden? Did the Pakistani’s know he was there? The answers are clear if you don’t have your head up your Liberal rear end. We first got the intelligence nugget about bin Laden’s courier from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM). It was obtained from Enhanced Interrogation Techniques in an out-of-the-country prison before bringing him to GITMO.

Regarding the Pakistanis, the first thing you do when you establish a 'safe house' is to secure the surrounding area. Clearly the Pakistani military and government would have known about these 'foreigners from Kuwait' who had a $1m compound with 18 foot walls. The Pakistanis clearly play both sides. What side does Obama think they will take when Obama pulls out of the Middle East? They would be crazy not to provide some level of support for the Taliban and Jihadist groups knowing we are leaving as soon as Obama can pull it off. Obama’s recent personnel moves taking out Petraeus and Gates signal the withdrawal is near. These guys would not go along with what Obama's handlers want to do.

So what do the Good Guys (that would be non-idiot Americans) in the US need to do?

1.  Pressure Obama to take action against Iran. Take any actions necessary to keep Iran from getting nukes and controlling Iraq including keeping troops in Iraq.

2.  Never make our defenses subservient to the UN or anyone else (this should also obviously include the Liberal Democratic Party).

3.  Support Petraeus in revitalizing the CIA who is our best defense, and offense, against Islamic Jihad (not invading ‘oil-less and nuke-less’ Afghanistan).  Use CIA/Seal Teams, drones, bombs, and missles against those who would harbor terrorists, NOT NATION BUILDING OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES.

4.  Make every effort to force the Obama Democratic Party to acknowledge the fact that the Bad Guys are Islamic Jihadists and the Good Guys are non-Islamic Jihadists.

5.  And of course, drill baby, drill.

As Yogi Berra said, "It is not over till it's over."  Certainly the war against Islamic Jihad is not over.  And, even the bullet in the head didn't end it for Osama bin Laden.  His real trial was held on May 1, as was Adolf Hitler's, on the same day just 66 years earlier.  That would give us two of the three sixes (666) symbolic of the antichrist.  The Bible tells us we have one more to go but it doesn't tell us when.  Maybe on May 1 in the not so distant future?

Think about it,

Jim

P. S.   Did you see this one?  "It is a great day for George Bush.  Osama bin Laden is dead, and 1.5 billion Muslims are super pissed at Obama".

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

An Inside Look at The Killing of Bin Laden

A mysterious friend of  Billy Roy has privy to the President's Little Red Phone:

Date:  August, 2010
Caller:  Mr. President, this is Mitch Rapp, special agent with the CIA.  Leon Panetta wanted me to call you and let you know we have credible sources who know where Osama bin Laden is living.
Callee: OK, Mitch.  Now jog my memory, who is this Been Laaden guy?
Caller: Mr. President, he is the mastermind behind the 9ll Twin Towers terrorist attack as well at the Pentagon and the one in Pennsylvania.  You remember the airplane thing.
Callee: Oh, yeah, of course.  Well how can I help you, Mitch?
Caller: Sir, Mr. Panetta would like some guidance on how to handle this situation.  bin Laden is in a compound in Pakistan.
Callee: Well, I'll be damned.  Mitch, why don't you give my Attorney General, Erich Holder, a call.  He has asked me not to get involved in this terrorist stuff (we don't like to use that word) without going through him.
I don't have Erich's number but Leon probably does.  Good talking with you and good luck on this Been Luuten thing.

Date:  September, 2011.
Caller:  Mr. President, this is Erich Holder, your Attorney General.
Callee:  Sure, Erich, I remember.  What's up?
Caller:  Mr. President, Panetta over at the CIA is driving me crazy about this bin Laden thing in Pakistan.  I have strongly suggested that Panetta turn this over to the FBI so that we can take this guy into custody, read him his Miranda rights, lawyer him up (I have a good friend out in Hollywood who would love to handle this one.  You know the young guy that worked with OJ).   We can hold a great trial in either Vegas or New York City.  Leon says that some hot shit guy name Mitch Rapp is pushing back and causing problems.
Callee: Look Erich, Axelrod wants me to start my re-election campaign in the next few months, and he doesn't want anything that would make waves.  Tell Panetta to sit on it until he hears from Axelrod.  By the way do you have Axel's number?  I'll call and let him know.
Caller:  Better let me do that Mr. President.  We will get back to you if we need to.

Date:  April 30, 2011
Caller:  Mr. President, this is David Axelrod, your campaign manager.
Callee: David, great to hear from you.  Can I move back to Chicago yet?
Caller:  Not yet, Mr. President, and I have other people on the call.  We have a situation.  Leon Panetta, who runs the CIA (you know the spook thing), and Erich Holder, Attorney General (you know the brother that is like the country's top lawyer).  They are on the line with me now.
Callee: Hi, guys.  I love these calls with people in all kinds of different locations, and yet we are all connected by telephone lines.  Way cool!  I wish Michelle was here.
Panetta: Mr. President, this is Leon.  I've got a real stud guy that works for me named Mitch Rapp.  He talked to you last August about this bin Laden guy that we have found in Pakistan as a result of George Bush's torturing prisoners, but I don't want to get into that, and hope Erich doesn't either.  Rapp has threatened to go to the press and tell them we have found bin Laden.  He will do that if we don't let him go in and take him out (whatever that means).  This would be a horrible thing if the press got it, and, David (again your campaign manager), would shit a brick if this happened.  So I am going to give Rapp your specific orders to go in and place this bin Laden guy under arrests.
Holder: I am OK with that as long as you bring him to directly to me.
Axelrod:  I am OK under two conditions.  One if it is successful, Rapp backs us in saying it was all planned by the President.  Two if it is a failure, I want it blamed on the Israelis.
Panetta: Got it.  Mr. President, do I have your orders?  Mr. President?  Mr. President, are you there?
Holder:  The Bulls playoff game just started.  I think we've lost him.

May 1, 2011
Caller:  Mr. President, this is Leon Panetta.
Callee:  Hey, Leon, this is Smokin Joe Biden.  I've got phone duty.  This is so cool.  It's never rung before.
Caller:  I have a situation and need the President.
Callee: Won't happen.  He's on the golf course.  Just made the turn at the 9th hole.  One of the boys called and said he had his best round ever going.  A 51, without penalty strokes of course, and with a few gimmie puts, but who is counting, right?  You want me to get Michelle or Valery or is it that important?
Caller.  Shut up Joe, and listen.  Get the President off the golf course and send him to my office.  Make him change clothes because we have a photo op.  He and some other people are going to watch Mitch Rapp and some Navy Seals in a key mission in Pakistan.  Tell the President this is not, I repeat, not a speaking part.  It is cameo.  Also, no refreshments will be served so have him grab a burger or some ribs on the way over.  Also, have him come in with his serious look.  You know the one I'm talking about?
Callee:  Cool, hey, is this Rapp dude a Hip Hop guy are something?  If he is, I might tag along.
Caller:  CLICK.  DIALTOONNEEEEEE.

The rest is history,

Think about it and sleep well tonight,

Jim

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Who Is Playing the Race Card and Why?

Well our President proved on Easter Sunday he is not currently a Muslim or even a Socialist or an Atheist as he and his family made a rare appearance at the predominantly black Shiloh Baptist Church in DC. The President has had difficulties in the past with his church attendance if you recall the Rev. Jeremiah Wright back in Chicago, a very active leader of the Black Liberation movement. You would think the President would be careful in picking his Easter church. Not so!

Shiloh Baptist's minister, Reverend Wallace Charles Smith, stated in a speech just last year that "America was no longer past its race problems, even with a black president, since 'Jim Crow' can now get a regular news program on Fox and Rush Limbaugh can make the same statements that was once the purview of Robert Shelton and members of the Ku Klux Klan and the White Citizen’s Council."

So once again we have a big Obama "why" question? Is he just naively stupid and doesn't know how to avoid such controversies or is he smart like a fox and taking actions that will invite this type of controversy? The answer may lie in the voters Obama must attract in 2012.

Let's start by identifying those who will not vote for Obama. Anyone who doesn’t is clearly a racist, a sexist, or a homophobe. Just listen to Liberals. What seems to be their definitions attached to these labels?

Racist: A Republican of any Race but Mostly White
Sexist: A Republican Male
Homophobic: Anyone that thinks marriage is about a man and a woman

So if you are black, Hispanic, female, or gay you would be crazy not to vote for Obama. And of course many impressionable young people, particularly if they are receiving student loans they don't plan to repay, don’t want to be like old racist, sexist, and homophobic people.

And then you have the guilt ridden white voters who want to make sure they are not identified with old sexists, racists, and homophobic people.  Many guilt ridden for some reason worship at the alter of the Political Elite.  It's like, "OK, I got rich but I didn't mean to, and it's not my fault!  I think the government should make up to those who are not as lucky as me."  My experience is that most of these are short on charity and big on government spending and tax shelters.

In 2008 Obama got huge majorities from  minorities and gays and enough white votes (43% including a majority of female and young voters) to win fairly easily. This begs the question of which group appears to vote more along strictly racial lines and more apt to receive the ‘racist’ label, black voters who voted 93% for Obama or white voters who voted 43% for Obama?  Blacks call it "justice" if over 90% vote for the black guy.  Coversely, many call the 57% of whites that didn't vote for the black guy racists.

Everything in 2012 points to a repeat with minorities and gays voting overwhelmingly for Obama no matter what the major issues are nor who the Republican's run. This means the election may be determined by young voters and white female voters. Can Obama convince white women voters that a vote for the Republican candidate is a vote for a sexist? Women, on the other hand, will have to determine whether they and their families will prosper more from a healthy growing economy or a declining economy focused on wealth redistribution. Will white women think they are on “Obama’s redistribution list"?

A ray of hope may be there in that  young voters are more concerned today about the fact that the political elite are creating huge US debt that they will have to repay. Interestingly, because of the debt issue many of the more intelligent young voters have been attracted to the message of the tea party and candidates like Ron Paul, who interestingly has always attracted young voters who think.

So it looks like the President is more fox than stupid.  His vote counter, David Axelrod, is having him shore up his base first, and then go after the middle.  Rev up those who hate racists, sexists, and homophobes.

Instead of preaching about justice and the evils of white people, I personally wish Obama could find a minister who focused on the following scripture, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)

If so, we could just focus our voting attention on little things like our collapsing economy, our illegal immigration problems, three wars with two having no US national interests, and the governmental and judicial trampling of our Constitution and individual rights.

Think about it,

Jim

Thursday, April 21, 2011

If Axelrod Fools Us Twice, We Are Complete Fools

One of the Facebook employees, you know the crowd who are going to save the Planet by enabling young mindless kids to “socially network”, pitched a softball to Obama by asking his opinion if Paul Ryan was courageous for being the first to propose solutions to the country's debt and spending addictions. Obama answered that Ryan was a Radical (unlike Jihadists who murder innocents). He went on to say, 'you are not courageous if you try to solve a problem on the backs of the poor, the powerless, those who don't have lobbyists, and those without clout'.

Well, Paul Ryan is courageous and Obama is DESPICABLE. Let me spell that out for you. His demagoguery generates hatred and contempt while separating Americans. His messages are despicable. At Facebook he sits with this billionaire punk who has a history of law suits claiming he cheated and stole from his work associates and accuses the top 10% of tax payers who pay 97% of all taxes and provide most of the jobs in the US of riding the backs of their parents and fellow Americans. Most of our charitable contributions come from this 10%. The top 1% represents over 30% of the spending in our economy. Every Obama remark and deceitful comment is orchestrated by a sleazy Chicago character by the name of David Axelrod.

Axelrod has a long successful record of manipulating voters to elect primarily black candidates in large populated areas. This strategy worked against Hillary Clinton and John McCain in 2008. Axelrod has resigned as Obama’s top aide to return to Chicago where is he managing Obama’s re-election. You just have to look at Axelrod’s background to see how this strategy operates. In 1985, Axelrod formed a political consultancy company, Axelrod & Associates. In 1987 he worked on the successful re-election campaign of Harold Washington, Chicago's first black mayor. This established his first experience in working with black politicians. Axelrod styles himself a ‘specialist in urban politics’ while The Economist notes he specializes in ‘packaging black candidates for white voters’. Axelrod was the key player in the following elections. Corruption and scandals followed in every case.  Sorry to dip into the weeds, but if we don't we are apt to get fooled again:

Harold Washington, Chicago: Washington's first term in office was characterized by ugly, racially polarized battles. Other first-term items include overall city population loss, increased crime, and a massive decrease in revenue to the City. This helped earn the city the nickname Beirut on the Lake, and many people wondered if Chicago would ever recover or face the more permanent declines of other cities in the Midwest. (Sound familiar)

Michael White, Cleveland: In July 2005, it was revealed by the FBI wired White's office.  As a result two of White's closest associates, Nate Gray and Ricardo Teamora admitted to bribery of public officials. When asked by Cleveland news reporters about the incident White stated: "For public consumption, I have not made a comment and I’ve seen no reason to change my position. It’s a Nate Gray matter, not a Mike White matter." However, it was revealed that White may have traded construction and parking for bribes that were paid through Gray. Federal prosecutors are reportedly investigating these corruption charges.

Anthony Williams, Washington, D.C.: In 2002, Williams ran for reelection and stumbled into a political scandal. The firm which he hired to collect signatures to put his name on the Democratic Primary ballot had irregularities with hundreds of names on the petitions. As a result of the irregular petitions, the Williams campaign was fined $277,700 and his name was removed from the Democratic Primary ballot

Lee Brown, Houston: Brown's 2001 reelection was one of the last major political campaigns supported by the Houston-based Enron Corporation, which collapsed in a financial scandal only days after Brown's reelection.

John Street, Philadelphia: During Street’s re-election campaign against Sam Katz the FBI acknowledged that it had placed listening devices in the Mayor's office as part of a sweeping investigation of municipal corruption. The FBI's investigation uncovered a corruption scheme led by Street's friend and fund raiser Ron White who died before going to trial. In September 2005, a prominent Muslim clergyman, Shamsud-din Ali, in Philadelphia was sentenced to more than seven years in prison on racketeering and other charges. Prosecutors said the cleric, who was once a member of Mayor John F. Street's transition team, used his political connections to obtain dubious loans, donations and city contracts. Mr. Ali was sentenced to 87 months in prison.

Axelrod additionally represented honored politicians such as John Edwards and Eliot Spitzer, a couple of really trusted public servants.

Axelrod’s flim flam pitch is simple, clear, and speeding forward. It is to spend more than $1B to seek out urban voters who “hate the rich” folks in the suburbs and in those country rural red states who call themselves Tea Partiers. These non-urban folks are radical, mean, and out to take advantage of those who have not been as lucky. Thank goodness all rich people aren’t like that. People like Obama and the punk from Facebook who got millions of dollars of free publicity from the President in this one appearance alone. No wonder Obama and friends think rich people are lucky.  Obama made his money on a book written by Bill Ayers, co-founder of a self-described communist revolutionary group that conducted a campaign of bombing public buildings during the 1960s. The Facebook punk allegedly stole his product from college friends. A product, that second to drugs, probably poses more of a threat to teens than anything else in our society.  And Soros has been lucky enough to manipulate currencies and financial markets bringing whole economies to their knees.  I guess the labor unions and wall street guys (they are rich)  are lucky to have Obama to provide taxpayer bailouts.

The country faces a test: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool us twice, we are complete fools!!

Think about it,

Jim

Monday, April 18, 2011

Missing the Iceberg: Our Last Chance Before 2012

Butch Jackson opened up with a story. Nothing new here. But on this day he may have out done himself. This in fact may be the most intriguing story of Butch's fabled story telling career. It went like this, "These next few weeks may be the best of times for our country or the worst of times. We will know soon. It was 99 years ago on April 15, 1912 the greatest cruise ship that had ever sailed the seas, the Titanic, sunk. They thought they were indestructible and blindly ran into an iceberg. On April 15, 2011 taxpayers of the greatest nation ever in this whole wide world dutifully wrote Barack Hussein Obama tax checks for $2.2 trillion."

"Barack suddenly realized that he was $1.3 trillion short of what he had promised to spend to get re-elected in 2012. Since he couldn't increase taxes immediately without approval of those pesky Republican House members, he realized he needs to continue borrowing money to meet his primary need to buy votes. His problem is that his bank has limited his credit to $14.294 trillion which they call a debt ceiling. So to borrow more he has to get Congress, including those pesky House Republicans, to agree to increase his credit limit or debt ceiling by another couple of trillion or so. Many of these silly new arrivals to Washington, called Tea Partiers, don't want to raise Barack Hussein's debt ceiling unless Washington agrees to quit spending trillions of dollars that their citizens and taxpayers don't have. These 'young gun' Republicans want either major spending caps or balanced budger legislation tied to the increased spending caps. Many are certain that if the tax and spend Dems aren't reined in now, they will spend the next 18 months buying votes for the 2012 election as the ship of state speeds toward bankrupcy."

"Like any ambitious yet incompetent community organizer Barrack Hussein called in his servants, in this case his bought and paid for Treasury Secretary from Wall Street, and asked, 'What do we do now?'. This little Wall Street guy named Timmie Geithner said, 'OK, here is the problem. We are spending $1.3 trillion more than we have. $430 billion of that is interest to our bankers for the money we have already borrowed. Let's tell Congress that we have to pay our debts whenever we receive the bills. We will tell them if we run out of money, which we will soon, and the lenders want their interest payments we can't pay them. Here is where it gets good. If we default and don't make these payments, then the entire financial system in the world will collapse. This is even better than what we told em when we passed TARP and Stimulus. This is our biggest crisis yet. Hell, even most of the dumb RINOS (Republicans in name only) will eat this up. I bet Jumpin John McCain will jump on it like Pelosi on a TV camera'."

"For some reason Barack Hussein then asked an unusual question for him, 'Is this story true?'. Little Timmie's answer was, 'sorta'. 'And in any case true or not, this is so complex, as always, no one will understand it anyway. The press will print what we say, and therefore we will make it true. Hell, Pelosi and Reid will even be able to get these talking points right. It might even wake old Biden up. So we just keep saying these radical extremist (not to be confused with Muslims) Tea Party Members are destroying the world economy by playing politics with the debt ceiling. We are saying that any prudent world leaders, like ourselves, would pursue deificit reduction on a parallet path from the dangerous path of fooling around with the 'full faith and credit of the Unitied States'. Meanwhile you can submit a budget that claims balance 15-20 years after you are safely out of office and running the UN. Meanwhile I am back on Wall Street shorting the dollar and making tons'. It just doesn't get sleazier, I mean easier, than this. How can a guy so short be so crooked?" Butch closed.

Billy Roy posed a question, "Is that the end of the story?"

"Barack Hussein and Little Wall Street Timmie hope it ends there. However, some of those smart young pesky Republicans that can smell bull shit in the next county even without a wind has authored a little bill that says the Treasury has to put lender's claims like for interest ahead of all other payments. This would force the government to have to meet their obligations to lenders, and then force them to have to cut their spending to keep from running out of money. Either that, or raise tax rates which would reduce the $2.2 trillion that is currently being paid in tax revenues. You know when you raise tax rates you reduce tax revenues because taxpayers are smart. This Republican bill is just what the spending addicts who need to buy votes to feed their habit fear the most. That and smart voters."

"Well put, Butch. Damned accurate as well. You caught em red handed," Billy Roy roared his approval of Butch's mini-odyssey. "It is interesting that Hussein will not admit that if the government continues to borrow trillions on end to pay his voters without any semi-believable plan on how we will repay the lenders that we will default. He only screams we default if we don't borrow more. This is aimed at that 3-7 year old idiotic audience and those that are bought and paid for. And of course the press. If someone reaches their debt limit they can still refinance their debt, they just can't add more. And they have to pay the interest from their income. I think I've got it. This system has always worked and always will unless it is circumvented by traitors or crooks or, in this case probably, both. It does force one to 'live within their means', and Obama has said he is for that, right?"

Aunt Martha pulled some specifics off the Cafe's internet connection, "To take the Obama Administration’s threat off the table, Republican Study Committee (RSC) Members Tom McClintock, along with RSC Chairman Jim Jordan, Rep. Virginia Foxx, and Rep. Scott Garrett have introduced the Full Faith and Credit Act. It mirrors a bill in the Senate offered by Pennsylvania Republican Senator Pat Toomey."

"According to an RSC description of the bill, 'The Full Faith and Credit Act directs the United States Treasury, in the event the debt ceiling is reached, to pay principal and interest due on debt held by the public before making any other payments'.”

"Critically, the description notes, 'This bill would merely codify standard Treasury practice'. Looks like Geithner has lied again."

Billy Roy closed it down, "Senator Marco Rubio, who is becoming my number one hero, next to Merle Haggard of course, has proposed conditioning support of an increase in the $14.294 trillion debt ceiling to passage of the Balanced Budget Amendment. He is right to push, and I believe he can't push these scoundrels too hard. This is the biggest fight of our generation. Remember the words of Jefferson, 'he who governs least, governs best. At least we should be able to get down to $2.2 trillion of Washington governance. In fact, we must. There is no reason the world’s greatest nation, under God, should be destroyed for someone’s political gain. Let's get the word out. Hell, I am even goin to take it to the Hubbard City Drug Store. Butch, you take the Dairy Queen, and we will meet back here with the folks headquartered at the Hubbard City Cafe."

Think about getting the word out because this may be our last chance before the 2012 election,

Jim

Thursday, April 14, 2011

The Nation Sinks As It Watches the TV Battle of Dems and Dopes

Our current President looked the teleprompter straight in the eye and read this lecture to the American people, "We have to live within our means." He then lied that he would keep the deficit from growing from $14 trillion to $26 trillion by $4 trillion trick of smoke and mirrors. This on the same day we got news on his most recent budget reducing accomplishments.

The recent bad TV battle between Dems and Dopes (why Dopes? it will be obvious) provides a perfect example of how Washington really works. Today the House votes on the $38 Billion budget reduction for the five months remaining on the 2011 non-budget (there never was a budget). And when the Congressional Budget Office scored the impact of these big cuts, guess what. The CBO "confirmed that the legislation does indeed cut that much from what federal agencies are authorized to spend this year -- but the study reveals that it will only amount to a reduction of $352 million (that is with an m not a b) in government spending for the rest of this fiscal year. That's in part because a significant portion of the cuts come from authorized funds that won't be spent this year". So in most cases they cut out spending they weren't going to spend anyway. Instead of reducing this years spending by less than 1% they cut by less then one tenth of one per cent. Welcome to Obama, Reid, and Boehner's historic spending cut.  Maybe the term "dope" is too kind.

When Obama took office he pledged to the International Community who borrows much of our debt that he would reduce our deficit by half by 2013. He pledged that again in his state of the union lie. The International Monetary Fund announced on Wednesday that the US "lacks a credible strategy to reduce its deficit and to reduce the debt by 50% by 2013 and it must take drastic action". The President's response was that he would not extend the Bush Tax Cuts AFTER 2012, AGAIN. This is the third time that he has pledged to not extend the Bush tax cuts. It's just like closing GITMO, AGAIN. Once Obama lies, you have to admit he sticks with it and keeps lying. Obama will always say he will do things to fix things as long as he doesn't have to do anything now. Now he votes PRESENT which is also a lie. He is ABSENT in his DERELICTION TO DUTY with every pledge he has made as President of the United States.

Now back to the President's speech to the Nation on debt reduction. Just when you thought this President could not get more idiotic, just when you thought this President could not insult the intelligence of the American people more, he stooped to a new low. The best news is surely this is rock bottom. Idiocy does not go below this. This speech was aimed at Democrats who have been "bought and paid for" and idiotic imbeciles. An idiot or imbecile is someone having a mental age of three to seven years.

First, the President lies that his plan will take a budget that will increase the nation's deficit or debt from the current $14 trillion to $26 trillion over the next 12 years, and he lies that he will take actions to reduce that to only $22 trillion. Now what mental age group do you think Obama targets with this logic. Now get this.  His action plan is to give this speech calling for the establishment of commissions to come up with a plan. This is his new plan to follow his previous plan to set up a Deficit Commission who came up with a plan that he ignored. Yes!!! And he is going to close GITMO and cut the deficit in half buy 2013.  A three to seven year old could get lost listening to this explanation in a speech that went on for what seemed like two or three days (Biden went even more unconscious than usual during this speech). A confused three to seven year old might even believe that this guy said something. After all the American people elected this guy President.  And then there is the other group.   Those that are "bought and paid for" (blacks, hispanics, welfare, unions, loan students, and government employees) don't care what he says. Just send the check.

The fact that there were no details to the claimed $4 Trillion cuts doesn't even matter. Obama plans to take no action before his 2012 re-election anyway. And even if the cuts were real, which they are not, this nation will still go bankrupt.

In summary, the stage is set for no action from Washington for the next year and a half except posturing and campaigning for the 2012 election.  All while our deficit increases drastically, our foreign policy weakens our security and world leadership, and we move closer to government takeovers of our way of life.  UNLESS dramatic action is taken by the Republican party in not increasing the debt limit, AND UNLESS the AMERICAN PEOPLE COME TO THE REPUBLICAN'S AID as they did during the 2010 elections. 

Is there hope?  Some.  The tea party has it right.  It is simple.  They are for:

A Balanced Federal Budget
Smaller Federal Government
Lower Taxes
Strong National Defense

But if we do that, we reduce the checks of those that are "bought and paid for".  They will fight.  Will we?

Think about it,

Jim