Wednesday, June 13, 2012

The First Ever HCC/Dick Morris Presidential Poll and Forecast

What with the November Election being of somewhat importance to the folks, not just in Hubbard, but in neighboring communities like Tampa, Raleigh, and even San Francisco it appears that the Cafe folks have joined up with none other than Dick Morris to publish their own polling results (with a lot of help from Rasmussen).  Not only do they have polling results but they have extrapolated (that would mean they have drawn conclusions for those of you in Mt. Calm) the November presidential election results.

Let it go down in history on this very day the Hubbard City Cafe with assistance from Dick Morris and Rasmussen do here now declare MITT ROMNEY THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WITH ELECTORAL VOTES TOTALING 317 (270 are needed again for those of you in Mr. Calm).  They also declare that one Barack Hussein Obama finishes in second place with a meager and probably overstated number of 222.

So here is the scoop.

In 2008 Obama received 365 electoral votes from misguided citizens.  Mitt Romney will have to carry all of the Red states carried by John McCain plus he will have to take states from Obama with a total of at last 96 electoral votes.

In Rasmussen's (the most objective and historically accurate of all pollsters) current polling for 9 swing states he reports the following:

Each swing state is shown with the latest polling showing voters that favor Romney followed by those that favor Obama.  The next two columns represent voters who want another candidate followed by undecided voters.  For example Pennsylvania (Pa.) voters favor Romney by 41% and Obama by 47% with 7% favoring another candidate and 5% undecided.

The next two columns factor in the Dick Morris projection.  Morris's studies show that 80-100% of "other candidate" and "undecided" voters will vote against the incumbent (Obama).  When this factor is applied at 80% Romney wins every one of these key swing states. Check out the numbers.

                                                                         Romney    Obama
Pa                                              41 47 7 5          51            49
Ohio                                           44 46 6 5         53            47
Iowa                                           46 47 3 4         51            49
Florida                                        46 45 6 3         53            47
Colorado                                    45 45 6 5         53            47
Virginia                                      47 47 3 3         52            48
North Carolina                            51 43 2 4         56            44
Missouri                                     49 42 6 3          56            44
Wisconsin                                    47 44 5 4         54            46

(excuse the ziging and zaging but these blog tools aren't based on Excel nor do they have tabs)

These states represent 132 electoral votes.  Not shown because we don't have a recent poll is Indiana which the Cafe feels will clearly switch to Romney in 2012 for another 11 votes for a total of 143 moving from Obama's 2008 total to Romney giving the Republican 317.

The Dick Morris factor clearly projects that any time Obama has less than 50% of the polling vote HE WILL LOSE THAT STATE.

Well, you heard it hear first. We call the election on June 13, 2012 for Mitt Romney, and IT AIN'T EVEN GOING TO BE CLOSE.  The American people are way too smart to buy that corrupt Chicago thuggery campaign stuff the second time around!!

Think about it,

Jim

Friday, June 8, 2012

Back To The Good Old American Way?

Butch was red faced and very loud as he came through the front door of the Hubbard City Cafe, "Obama told a group of college students in Arizona yesterday, 'There are those who ask why I am working to keep interest rates on student loans from going up when I should be working on the economy.  They don't understand that this is the economy'.  Typical bullshit and deceit from the MASTER OF BULLSHIT AND DECEIT.  Same old tactics.  Set up a fictional straw man inferring that it is one of Obama's adversaries (Conservative Radicals) and compare your rational approach against the straw man.  This skinny, flop eared liar does it over and over.  In this case the day before the speech John Boehner proposed avoiding the adjustment of interest rates back to the originals by paying for them by cutting budget items that Obama had recommended in his own budget.  Of course Obama has no intention of cutting anything knowing his budget would not be passed.  Obama tactics are pure and simple scare techniques aimed at the dumb and dumber crowd of moochers.  Fabricate a position for some unnamed opposition, demonize it, and claim your extreme Liberal position is therefore balanced and moderate.  Only imbeciles would fall for this, and the polls are showing there are not enough imbeciles out there to re-elect skinny."

This was an unusual coffee session since none other than Billy Mack Weller, owner/operator of the Country Kitchen, was having coffee at his friendly rivals from across Magnolia avenue.  Billy Mack climbed all over this straw man deceit, "How about New York City?  Mayor Bloomberg with the help of none other than Michelle, herself, has wants to out law any non-diet soda over 16 ounces to protect Americans from obesity.  They say their focus is on the children.  They say there are too many kids that are starving, and too many that are obese.  Sounds like the three bears.  They want to make it 'just right' for everyone."

"It is typical Liberal BS which is supported by the worthless political elite.  Harvard professor Daniel E. Lieberman writes in The New York Times that there are only three options in the obesity debate. The first is to do nothing. The second is better nutritional education. 'The final option,' he says, 'is to collectively restore our diets to a more natural state through regulations.' This approach is consistent with the way America's political class likes to frame every debate as a choice between doing nothing and letting the government do it."


"Most real Americans see a fourth option, THE GOOD OLD AMERICAN WAY."

"And what would that be, Billy," asked none other than my Mom, Maxine.

"One that is consistent with traditional American values: Let individuals make their own choices, and then let them bear the burden or reap the reward of those choices.  In other words let individuals take responsibility for their actions.  The truth is this is the only solution to this country's problems and to an individuals personal problems.  If you live a healthy life style of exercise, diet, and medical care you benefit.  If you don't you pay the price.   That's the reason Americans overwhelmingly support the notion that health insurance companies should have the freedom to offer discounts to non-smokers."

"The same logic applies to other lifestyle choices. Sixty-three percent think insurance companies should offer discounts to individuals who make good health choices.  The free market is all about accountability and responsibility.  The government and their lawyer buddies want to make everyone a victim.  My favorite golf partner tells me when I hit a bad shot that it is not my fault, and therefore, I shouldn't count the stroke in my score.  I love the guy but it doesn't make my game any better just like the government doesn't make a person's life any better.  Seems like to me blaming Bush for this economy hasn't made the economy any better, and neither will blaming soda cups larger than 16 ounces.  Hell, what are they going after next?  Chicken fried steak?  Over my dead body!"

Billy Roy Mitchum was just taking it all in, as Chairmen are apt to do, "Well the Chicago thugs have gone after Mitt's business record at Bain, and oops, folks compared it to Solyndra.  They then went after his record as Governor of Massachusetts, and oops, folks compared it to Obama's record running the USA.  Now they are going after the Legislature where the Senate is run by their very own Demwits, and the Dems who are running for re-election are pushing back on that ploy.  Oops, oops, oops."

 "So they then say let's trot out Old Slick Willie, 'he'll get em'.  But these new modern news reporting devices are causing problems.  They report daily what Slick Willie actually says, and of course he lies like a hound dog seeking employment at an Alpo plant.  This last lie was one of his very best.  He says he didn't know the Bush Tax Cuts DIDN'T EXPIRE until after the election and apologized for saying they should be temporarily extended.  Now if he didn't know any particulars about the Bush Tax Cuts why the hell is anyone supposed to listen to him, and if he did know (which he did) he is lying as usual.  This all adds up to the latest polls showing 43% for Romney and 43% for Skinny.  That leaves 14% undecided or for another candidate.  Taking the Dick Morris rule (80-100% of the undecided polling will vote against the incumbent) Romney has an 11-14% lead.  If the vote was held today, Romney would win BIG TIME."

"My prediction is the Chicago Thugs will continue to do stupid things giving Romney a lead of something like 46-41%.  Then these thugs will do something really big and really dirty sometime in the last 60 days of the race.  They will bomb Iran, release tests that it was actually Romney's DNA on Monica's blue dress, put Mrs. Slick Willie on the ticket if her girl friend will let her run, or create daily race, gender, and class OCCUPY RIOTS at all voting locations in the swing states.  And of course, they will say the Republicans and Romney will steal the social security trust fund and rob medicare so they can give larger tax loopholes to the fat cats.  They will make the dust fly as best they can while challenging the voting results in all the swing states."

"My faith in the American people and my confidence that the Chicago crowd are so nasty that I believe this election will cause a return to good old fashioned American values of equality, liberty, and freedom for all centered on individual accountability and responsibility.  Americans, including many moochers, will have to go back to work and many will go back to church having tasted the nasty life of socialist thugs.  Obama will go down in history as a MINOR LEAGUE THUG who didn't reach the heights of the  likes of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, etc.  The difference is the American people will have caught on to Obama before he made the Major Leagues.  Also, being skinny and flop eared didn't help him either."

Think about it,

Jim

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Obama Goes Center Stage With His Socialist Agenda

Butch Jackson came in steaming as if he had blown one major gasket, and as it turned out, he had (and for good reason). "That flop eared, skinny, liar has really done it this time. Surely the American people will wake up, and by wake up I mean after today's news he shouldn't have more than the Commie vote which couldn't be more than 15-20% of this country (I am ashamed to say it is that high)."

Obviously it was time for Billy Roy to intervene before this got out of hand, "Whoa there, partner. I scanned the Waco Times Herald and must have missed something. What is going on?"

"Did you see where Floppy awarded 13 Medal of Freedom awards yesterday? The paper says he got real personal in saying 'I know how all 13 impacted my life'. He listened to Bob Dylan in college (probably while in a drug daze) and, 'my world opened up'. Then the big one, 'Obama recalled reading about union trailblazer Dolores Huerta, who co-founded the National Farm Workers with Cesar Chavez, when he WAS STARTING OUT AS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER.' He went on to say 'everybody on this stage has marked my life in profound ways'. This Medal of Freedom is presented to people who have made meritorious contributions to the national interests of the United States, to world peace, or to other significant endeavors. So what did this Dolores lady do? Let's look at who she is."

"This 82 year old is the honorary chair of the Democratic Socialists of America. I am not making this up. I am going to read this right off their web site.

Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few.

Today, corporate executives who answer only to themselves and a few wealthy stockholders make basic economic decisions affecting millions of people. Resources are used to make money for capitalists rather than to meet human needs. We believe that the workers and consumers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them.

Social ownership could take many forms, such as worker-owned cooperatives or publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives. While the large concentrations of capital in industries such as energy and steel may necessitate some form of state ownership, many consumer-goods industries might be best run as cooperatives.

In the short term we can’t eliminate private corporations, but we can bring them under greater democratic control. The government could use regulations and tax incentives to encourage companies to act in the public interest and outlaw destructive activities such as exporting jobs to low-wage countries and polluting our environment. Most of all, socialists look to unions make private business more accountable.

Question: Are you a separate party from the Democrats? No, we are not a separate party. Like our friends and allies in the feminist, labor, civil rights, religious, and community organizing movements, many of us have been active in the Democratic Party. We work with those movements to strengthen the party’s left wing, represented by the Congressional Progressive Caucus. For now, we will continue to support progressives who have a real chance at winning elections, which usually means left-wing Democrats.


"Butch, once again you have done some really good spade work here," the Chairman gave a rare compliment.  "While the press is focused on whether Governor Romney's private equity efforts were to create jobs or to make rich investors richer Obama has once again told us in no uncertain terms just who he is, a Socialist Colonialist.   His mission in life is to realize his father's dream of transforming the world's HAVES into HAVE NOTS. 

A vote for Obama is very simply a vote for:

1.  Crippling our economy by placing higher taxes on producers
2.  More government regulation and control of all facets of our lives
3.  Redistributing wealth from producers to moochers

A vote for Romney is a vote for:

1.  Business incentives  including lower taxes to encourage investment and growth in our economy
2.  Less regulations and more dependence on time proven free economic principles
3.  The creation of jobs and wealth that are fundamental by-products of a growing economy

To net it out the race is between those who believe that capitalism has created the greatest and most successful nation in history and those who believe in higher taxes, more government regulation of the economy, and the distribution of wealth.


It is amazing with Socialist Europe on its knees, with Communism collapsing around the world, and with even the Chinese moving to capitalism and free markets that the United States of America is considering re-elect an incompetent Socialist to be the leader of the free world.  It is not like we don't know who he is anymore.  It is not like we don't have 3 1/2 years of evidence of his lies and betrayals.  It is not like our nation isn't on the brink of bankruptcy with $15 trillion of debt.  It is not like Obama isn't adding over $1 trillion each year to our debt while looking the country right in the eye and lying that he has increased spending less than any President in the last 60 years," Billy Roy closed.

I encourage each of you to listen to Ms. Huerta's own words as she praises Caesare Chavez while proclaiming that Republicans hate latinos.  Go to this link and click on the second picture in the middle of the article that says WE CAN HELP.  Hear Obama's idol in her own words.

 http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/29/obama-awards-medal-of-freedom-to-democratic-socialists-of-america-chair/

Think about it,

Jim

Friday, May 25, 2012

And She Called Me A Racist!

Interesting dinner last week with friends. Politics, the forbidden dinner topic, reared its head and drifted to welfare and government programs. I made the statement that we really need to address our "Black Problem". A good friend of mine, who is also a former New York resident and liberal, corrected me. She said, "You mean we have a problem with the disadvantaged." I repeated, "We have a black problem," She then called me a Racist. I chalked this up as one more intelligent exchange between a Conservative and Liberal.

Let's talk about this.

In today's Austin American Statesman, not known for its Conservative positions, Ken Herman (not known for his conservative positions as well), writes "Central Texas African American community produces too many children that wind up in foster care and too few black volunteers to help these children." He cites 68% of African American children in Travis Country are born out of wedlock and only 17% of whites (which is still too many whites!). Herman says too many blacks drop out of school, too many wind up in prison, and too many failed government programs exist. Herman speaks of the "evolving redefinition of marriage". Herman then makes an impassioned and constructive plea for more blacks to volunteer as special advocates for abused and neglected children through an organization named CASA. Only 6% of the current volunteers are black.

In the same newspaper there is a long article about food stamp fraud. It seems that of all agencies our Agriculture Department is out of control with a runaway food stamp program. Recipients can sell their food stamp cards for cash and request a replacement. Stores are forbidden to request identification to verify ownership. Also, many card owners get cash from crooked retail store operators to buy alcohol and drugs. So what is the Ag Department's remedy? They will now allow states to "question" card holders who lose more than three cards in a calender year". Also, this crack federal agency has requested that Facebook, Twitter, Ebay,and Craigslist not allow the buying and selling of food stamp cards on the Internet. WOW! If the Ag guys are not careful they may take action that could reduce their bulging federal budgets. God forbid!  Their answer on why they tread so carefully in controlling the system, "many of our people are homeless or have dementia or mental illness."  So the federal government's solution to the homeless and the mentally ill is to allow food stamp trafficking to funnel cash and drugs to recipients?

In the same edition of this newspaper (I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP) the director of advocacy for the Capital (that be Austin) Area Food Bank authored a huge article entitled, "Combat hunger and you'll combat other health issues". Her article was just loaded with facts. I have wondered personally how we can fight world hunger and obesity among the poor all at the same time. She really cleared it up for slow people like me. Ms. Green starts with the fact, "that 1 of every 6 Americans struggle with hunger". She continues, "as hunger is often a symptom of poverty, those cannot purchase nutritious food." She says, "surprisingly, some hungry people are also overweight. This occurs when access to fresh, nutritious food is difficult and expensive." WOW, WOW, AND A DOUBLE WOW! Thank goodness for Michelle Obama and her White House garden! And then Ms. Green really takes it home with more statistics, "According to the Center of Disease Prevention more than 1 in 3 adults and 17% of children are OBESE." And now Ms. Green's solution, "Programs such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps) need to give more hungry people more purchasing power to buy food." Can you believe the name of the food stamp program? By putting more money into the program we turned hunger into obesity. If we can just put more money in we can all buy veggies from someone like Michelle and live happily ever after. What a great country we live in!

Just looking at "the facts". We are basically told that about 45% of Americans are fat and hungry, and we just need a few more programs from the federal government and more money of rich tax payers. Making poor people obese just isn't fair.

So what is the big problem here? It is the old producer and moocher thing. There are too many government programs providing incentives for moochers to take from the producers. The programs are for food stamps, welfare payments, tax rebates for non-tax payers, extended unemployment and fake disability claims, student loans, incentives for single parents, marriage tax penalties, public housing, etc., etc.  It is clear that Obama wants to drive organizations like the Catholic Church out of the assistance business whether it be hospitals, schools, or charities for the poor.  HHS recently said religious organisations must provide early abortion support to their employees resulting in laws suits this week.  Obama wants his voting base to look to HIM, not their church or community for assistance and a safety net.

Why pick on blacks who certainly aren't all problems nor do they represent all of our nation's problems. Because there are too many blacks mooching and not enough producing. Some blacks believe they are entitled to mooch off white tax payers because their ancestors were mistreated.  There are black pimps who work to keep blacks down and under their influence and control. Obama is a black pimp. He has done nothing to help blacks WORK their way out of poverty. I repeat, WORK, WORK, WORK.  This mixed race President who claims to be African American stirs up division between blacks and whites in an attempt to cement his voting block needing over 95% of the black vote for re-election. When blacks were recently interviewed while standing in a welfare line they said they were there to receive their "Obama Juice". Obama isn't alone. There are entire industries and many government agencies working to create a downtrodden black culture from which they can benefit.

Even public educators fight for the status quo which in many black neighborhoods means inferior education. Obama was quick to support stopping funding for Charter Schools in Washington DC once elected.  Started in 2004, the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship provided vouchers of up to $7,500 to low-income, mostly minority children for private-school tuition. Democrats never liked the program and -- egged on by the teachers unions -- made the program's demise a top priority. Congress moved to cut off funding, and the Obama administration went right along.  Despite the fact Obama's two daughters attend the elite Sidwell Friends School because he knew they would get a far better education there than in the struggling D.C. public schools.


The sad part of this story is, as always, the ones who are hurt the most are the moochers themselves.  Shame on us.  We were on the right track back when Clinton ran to the middle and passed welfare reform with the Republican Congress.  A small step, but in the right direction.  And that was a long, long time ago.
Think about it,

Jim

Thursday, May 17, 2012

The Founder's Plan for America Really Does Need "Progressive Change"

The founders drafted many "protective" provisions in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  None of the provisions were more important than those protecting INDIVIDUALS from MAJORITY RULE.  Their greatest fears in breaking away from European style monarchies were the threats posed to individual liberties from majority rule.

The founders knew these protections would be needed in a Democracy so basically they created a Republic instead.   A good bit of their foundation for government was in expressly protecting the rights of individuals to own property, for religious worship, against unreasonable searches, etc.  In addition they established safeguards such as states rights, requirements of 2/3s majorities, and divided powers among the three branches of government as other examples of their fear of big overreaching government.  What they didn't anticipate was that this nation would not only open their borders to illegal immigration but would elect an administration who would refuse to enforce the laws while violating their oaths to protect the Constitution.

So where are we?  We have just completed a census with more than frightening demographics.  A census in which more than half of children less than one year of age are minorities.  In Texas alone, more than 7 out of 10 children under age 1 are minorities.  In California it is 75%.  In Austin, Texas 48% of children under 5 years of age are Hispanic and only 39% are White.  There is no question that this trend will change the very nature of our country and culture as we have known it. 

And yet today, we have two branches of the government, Executive and US Senate, pushing for an amnesty program called "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" to create a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, most of which are Hispanic.  Clearly this legislation would only accelerate the trend to put the White majority into a minority position.

These demographic shifts place a huge burden on our weakened economy with more people suckling at the breast of the tax payer than any founder ever conceived.  Jobs at the lower end of the employment ladder, where the welfare recipients should be employed, are going to illegals instead.  We are creating a temporary society where poorer American Citizens don't have to take jobs that they are qualified to do because they can choose to take government entitlements instead.  A recently unemployed young male welfare recipient said, "He wasn't looking for a job, he was looking for a career".  His appearance and poor English were that of an uneducated person like most of the others in this particular, and long, welfare line.  Next door, the Employment line where those could find jobs, was unattended.  Many of those interviewed said they were there to get their "Obama Juice", that being money, food stamps, and other hand outs.

The more our uneducated underclass are given incentives to not work nor become educated, the more we use illegals to fill the gap, the more we put burdens on our bankrupted welfare state, the more we destroy the basic fabric of our nation.

Earlier the society was defined as temporary.  That is because the trend cannot last for long.  Why?  Because the momma pig being suckled will run out of MONEY.  That will happen when others refuse to loan her money to fund our over suckling.  She will go dry, and probably within 5-10 years if we continue down this same path.  More than likely the society will then turn to some lying impostor who claims he or she will provide something like HOPE AND CHANGE.  He or she will take dictatorial powers resembling a third world South American country (Cubans are still driving 55 Chevys, but they need a lot of work). 

Obama and those of like minds will have achieved their goal of DOWNSIZING THE USA FROM ITS FORMER POSITION AS A COLONIAL POWER.  Unlike Obama, the founders, who came here to escape colonialism, would have called their creation the DEMOCRATIC LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD AND MOST SUCCESSFUL SOCIAL EXPERIMENT IN HISTORY.

What is most sad about such a scenario is those who will suffer the most, as always, will be the poor and middle class who bought into the age old socialist propaganda that their problems are the result of capitalism, liberty, and free markets.

But there is an alternative. 

1.  Vote Obama and the Democratic Congress out in November.  Throw out Career Republican Rhinos. 
2.  Get the economy moving (we know exactly how to do that and have done it many times before in recovering from a recession:  see Ronald Reagan). 
3.  Close the borders and reform Immigration Laws.
4.  Shut down welfare programs and safety nets that do not make able bodied citizens work. 
5.  Insure that all laws encourage and support families instead of disadvantaging families. 
6.  Retain our world military leadership with the intent to protect and encourage free markets and liberty.  Call out those who enslave their citizens (again:  see Ronald Reagan and his Evil Empire strategy)  
7.  And lastly, explore Constitutional Amendments to strengthen Life, Liberty, Property, and Freedom of Religion rights.  "Progressive" change should strengthen the founder's vision of the American dream in the modern world, not destroy their intent.  Examine voting rights.  Some options might require property owenership or tax payments.  Today, we debate whether we can ask for an ID?

The alternative will not be easy.  It will take commitment, dedication, and hard work.  But mostly, it will take LEADERSHIP.  God will surely provide it, but we must make the request.  Say your prayers tonight.

Think about it,

Jim

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Are the Mexican Cartels Afraid of the First Gay President?

As the free world follows the insane debate over our Skinny President's waffling views on some fabricated thing called gay marriage the Cafe in the City of Hubbard isn't buying in. Butch set the stage as usual, "Debating whether marriage should only be between one man and one woman is as sane as debating whether only women should give birth. Or if it is fair for only men to be able to impregnate a wife. Have we completely lost our minds? Marriage between one man and one woman is a natural and God given law.  Birds fly!  Fish swim under water!  Male dogs mark their territories!  Female dogs have puppies!  One man marries one woman and they form a family!   Period!  Debate over.  Move on!  Hell, I would rather Romney cut my hair off if it was too long, then have to marry Obama!"

Billy Roy piled on, "The same sex marriage debate is perfect for Obama because it is such a ridiculous concept the Liar-In-Chief can make it up as he goes. In 1996 when Obama ran for the Illinois State Senate he filled out a form for a Gay Newspaper questionnaire for candidates and said 'I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages'. In 2004 when he ran for the Senate he said, 'I am not a supporter of gay marriage as it has been thrown out. I think that marriage as in the minds of voters is a religious issue'."

"Then in 2008 when he ran for President, 'I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage'. He said same-sex marriage was against his religion and something that should be in the hands of churches rather than government. By October 2010 as President he acknowledged, 'I have been against same-sex marriage because of my understanding of traditional definitions. But I also think that attitudes evolve, including mine'. Then last week he said, 'I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to be married'.  Wow!  Well I've been evolving on big, fat guys being able to jump like bull frogs but it just hasn't happened for this cowboy yet."

"Same sex marriage is just like Obama. It is phony in its very nature. Obama thinks that if he just says something, it is then true. Saying two people of the same sex can be married just doesn't make it true. Marriage is a sacred union between only one man and only one woman with the intent of creating children and providing care for a natural family. My barn swallows even understand that. My barn swallows have not been able to 'evolve' because it takes God to make 'natural' changes not some bozo like what Time magazine calls the first gay president. Remember when they called Clinton the first black president. You know 'saying it' didn't make that true either. Clinton is still white except for that huge nose of his which seems to always glow like a big red neon sign.  The awful truth is Obama doesn't care one bit about any kind of marriage, he just cares about downsizing the mean old USA, and destroying the concept of the family is the foundation of this great country."

"And while this stupid crap is going on there is a little item in the paper about 47 bodies found in Mexico on a popular route from Central America to Texas with their arms, hands, feet, and heads amputated. The bodies are unidentified and believed to be kidnapped citizens. And get this, IT IS THE FOURTH MASSACRE THIS MONTH. The UN backed by US air power overthrew the Libyan leader, Qaddafi, and slaughtered his military for far less than this. The fact that our political leaders allow open borders with millions of illegal immigrants including drug smugglers and terrorists pouring over our borders breeding the lawlessness that results in these massacres is criminal. Every American citizen should be totally ashamed. My guess is this problem would not be ranked in the top five issues the American voter cares about.  Just where is out shame?"

"What is the Liberal solution? COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM, which is a code name for providing amnesty to illegals which would give the Dem's a voting majority that would destroy the country as we know it.  All Libs care about is power."

Mom had a question, "I get that you would do more with this Mexican problem. Like what?"

"Hell, Maxine, I not only would put troops and drones on the border to close it down to drugs, terrorists, and illegals, but I would pursue them into Mexico if that is what it took to shut down the massacres and illegal drug trade. I just read that 70% of the Mexican population would welcome American assistance in combating the drug cartels. How can the rest of the world respect us if we allow this rotten situation just to the south of us?  We should tell the Mexican officials that either they clean the mess up or we will.  I would be patient though and give them a good week for their answer."

Well as they say, Billy Roy has a different way of looking at things then a lot of people.  Is Mexico on your worry screen?

Think about it,

Jim

Thursday, May 10, 2012

The Big Unemployment Lie That Might Re-Elect Obama

In January this blog reported Obama’s good news to the nation that unemployment had gone down to 8.5%. In February we reported another announced drop to 8.3%. On May 5th, even with lousy jobs numbers of just over 115,000 new jobs added (we need 400,000 per month minimum), the number was reduced to just above the magic number of 8%. Historians tell us no President has ever been re-elected with an UNEMPLOYMENT RATE over 8%. Real close, huh?

Unless there is a public outcry Obama can falsify the unemployment number to be anything he wishes to support his deceit of the electorate and gain his re-election.

In January we reported Hilda Lucia Solis may be the most important person in the country when it comes to the 2012 Presidential Election. Why? Because Hilda can make Obama's Unemployment Number anything that Obama wants it to be. Right now he is falsely reporting an 8.1% Unemployment Rate. Ms. Solis, Obama’s chief chef, is “COOKING THE BOOKS”! Here is how it works.

When Obama entered office the Civilian Population of the United States was approximately 234.6 million people. The percentage the Department of Labor (under George Bush) calculated as being in the Work Force was 66.1% (called the participation rate) or 155 million of the total population. Today, the population has increased by 8.1 million people since Bush left office, and yet the Obama DOL reports the Work Force has shrunk by 647 thousand workers. They report that only 63.6% of the Population (again, called the Participation Rate) is in the Work Force.

Bush’s DOL reported that 145.5 million workers were employed and 9.5 million were unemployed and the rate of unemployment was 6.1%. Obama reports today 139.6 million (almost 6 million fewer) are employed and 13.8 million are unemployed (4.3 million more). As the people looking for jobs know, this so called recovery is non-existent.

Yet, because Obama reduces the estimated Work Force each reporting period he shows improvement in the Unemployment metric. The punch line is this. IF OBAMA USED THE SAME PARTICIPATION RATE AS BUSH (AND WASN’T COOKING THE BOOKS) TODAY’S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE WOULD BE A TRUE…….13% INSTEAD OF THE REPORTED 8.1% (SOON TO BE UNDER 8%).

THE LOGIC IS SIMPLE. THEY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THE WORK FORCE, KEEP THE EMPLOYED NUMBER THE SAME, AND FORCE A SMALLER PERCENTAGE AS UNEMPLOYED. THE MATH WORKS LIKE THIS. IF I HAVE 100 PEOPLE IN THE WORK FORCE AND 80 ARE EMPLOYED MY UNEMPLOYMENT PERCENTAGE IS 20%. IF IN THE NEXT REPORTING PERIOD I REDUCE THE WORK FORCE TO 90 AND 80 ARE EMPLOYED MY UNEMPLOYMENT PERCENTAGE GOES DOWN TO 11%. THE LIARS CAN MAKE THE NUMBER ANYTHING THEY WISH JUST BY ADJUSTING THE PARTICIPATION PERCENTAGE.

GOT IT. JUST AS YOU KNEW, THESE PEOPLE MAKE BILL CLINTON LOOK MINOR LEAGUE WHEN IT COMES TO DISTORTING THE TRUTH.

RAW NUMBERS: WE NEED 156 THOUSAND NEW JOBS EACH MONTH JUST TO KEEP UP WITH POPULATION GROWTH. WE NEED ANOTHER 250 JOBS EACH MONTH TO GET THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE NEAR THE 2008 NUMBER. ANY REPORT LESS THAN 400 THOUSAND JOBS ADDED PER MONTH WILL NOT MEASURE UP. BEWARE OF THE “CHERRY PICKING” WHICH THE OBAMA CREW (INCLUDING THE OBAMA PRESS) WILL SURELY DO.

Sometimes we have to go into the weeds because that is where the snakes like Obama and Hilda live. David Axelrod, Obama’s Lie-Master, knows the press will not get into the weeds, and doubts we will.

Think about it,

Jim