A letter to the folks:
Sunday on the talk shows Obama gave his campaign speech for the 17th Trillionth time (the only thing larger than our deficit). He was interrupted by the narrator who asked the simple question, “Will you push for real entitlement reform in the first year of this term?” Obama did not answer. The narrator then tried this, “What are you priorities for your second term?”
Obama’s answer went something like this, “I have a couple. One of the top priorities is to introduce legislation to reform immigration (explanation: try to get more Hispanic votes to kick the majority Republican out of the House in 2014). Next is reducing the deficit but I will not do it on the backs of old people and young people (explanation: I will not mess with entitlements and cater to young voters for 2014). I will push for infrastructure spending to create jobs (explanation: I owe Labor Unions). We have a great opportunity to create jobs in the energy field while protecting our environment (explanation: I will continue to give taxpayer money to wind and solar buddies while doing everything I can to kill the coal, oil, and gas industries.)”
Later on Obama affirmed he would support gun control (see Why Gramps carries a gun below.)
National security does not appear to be a second term issue. He obviously will continue dismantling and withdrawing the military and CIA (e.g. Benghazi). His major security scheme is to have the FBI investigate any crime committed by the bad guys against Americans in an attempt to bring non-citizen terrorists to American justice. In summary withdraw around the world, fall in behind the UN and any other global organization, and treat aggression as “illegal acts” using the American criminal justice system.
Bottom line, folks, WE AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET. Obama is ahead of schedule in destroying the USA economically, culturally, and militarily. Did you ever think you would see the day when Russians and Chinese had capitalistic advantages over Americans? It is happening. Just as sad, I do not see one Republican leader calling a spade a spade and standing in Obama’s way. No national Republican leader has publicly warned America of Obama’s intentions. Meanwhile the Moderate Republicans are trying to seize the crisis to blame Conservatives for not compromising. It is clear Obama will never compromise. He will only use Republican offers to compromise as admissions that he is right.
I wish we had better news but it will not get better until a national conservative leader steps up and tells the American people the truth in simple terms.
What do we do? Hide our guns, our money, and circle the wagons around family and friends. Politically our only hope in the next four years is with local and state political leaders doing everything they can to protect citizens from the federal government. We must find a way to put maximum pressure on local politicians.
Jim
WHY GRAMPS CARRIES A GUN AND THE SECOND AMMENDMENT (author unknown)
My old grandpa said to me 'Son , there comes a time in every man's life
when he stops bustin' knuckles and starts bustin' caps and usually it's
when he becomes too old to take a whoopin.'
I don't carry a gun to kill people.
I carry a gun to keep from being killed.
I don't carry a gun to scare people.
I carry a gun because sometimes this world can be a scary place.
I don't carry a gun because I'm paranoid.
I carry a gun because there are real threats in the world.
I don't carry a gun because I'm evil.
I carry a gun because I have lived long enough to see the evil in the
world.
I don't carry a gun because I hate the government.
I carry a gun because I understand the limitations of government.
I don't carry a gun because I'm angry.
I carry a gun so that I don't have to spend the rest of my life hating
myself for failing to be prepared.
I don't carry a gun because I want to shoot someone.
I carry a gun because I want to die at a ripe old age in my bed , and not
on a sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon.
I don't carry a gun because I'm a cowboy.
I carry a gun because , when I die and go to heaven , I want to be a
cowboy.
I don't carry a gun to make me feel like a man.
I carry a gun because men know how to take care of themselves and the
ones they love.
I don't carry a gun because I feel inadequate.
I carry a gun because unarmed and facing three armed thugs , I am
inadequate...
I don't carry a gun because I love it.
I carry a gun because I love life and the people who make it meaningful
to me.
Police protection is an oxymoron.
Free citizens must protect themselves.
Police do not protect you from crime , they usually just investigate the
crime after it happens and then call someone in to clean up the mess.
Personally , I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to
take an "ass" whoopin'....
.author unknown (but obviously brilliant)
**********************************************
A LITTLE GUN HISTORY
In 1929 , the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953 ,
about 20 million dissidents , unable to defend themselves , were rounded
up and exterminated.
------------------------------
In 1911 , Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917 , 1.5 million
Armenians , unable to defend themselves , were rounded up and
exterminated.
------------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945 , a total
of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were
rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952 , 20 million
political dissidents , unable to defend themselves , were rounded up and
exterminated.
------------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981 , 100 , 000
Mayan Indians , unable to defend themselves , were rounded up and
exterminated.
------------------------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979 , 300 , 000
Christians , unable to defend themselves , were rounded up and
exterminated.
------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977 , one million
educated people , unable to defend themselves , were rounded up and
exterminated.
-----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century
because of gun control: 56 million.
------------------------------
You won't see this data on the US evening news , or hear politicians
disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and , yes ,
gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans , before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control , please remind them
of this history lesson.
With guns , we are 'citizens'. Without them , we are 'subjects'.
During WW II the Japanese decided not to invade America because they
knew most Americans were ARMED!
If you value your freedom , please spread this anti gun-control message
to all of your friends.
The purpose of fighting is to win.
There is no possible victory in defense.
The sword is more important than the shield , and skill is more important
than either.
The final weapon is the brain.
All else is supplemental.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN!
SWITZERLAND 'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE.
SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED
COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
IT'S A NO BRAINER!
DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT
TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.
I'm a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment!
If you are too , please forward.
Monday, December 31, 2012
Monday, November 26, 2012
Communism Is Too Slow For Obama
To: Billy Roy
From: Jim in Austin
I am so confused about the fiscal cliff. Help?
To: Jim in Austin
From: Billy Roy in Hubbard
First, everyone in Austin is confused. It is that stupid communist newspaper, The Austin American Statesman (American my ass!).
Here is the net:
Our federal government has tax revenues annually of about $2.5 Trillion
Our federal government spends annually of about $3.5 Trillion
Even Biden knows this doesn't work. Now comes the politics aimed at the idiots (Biden included). Revenues come mostly from taxes. Republicans feel when taxes are low, the economy grows at more than the current anemic rate of 1.5% (should be more like 4%) because businesses and people invest and spend. They feel the larger the economy the more the federal government receives in tax revenues. Republicans believe the big problem is too much spending not too few taxes and an economy that is growing too slowly.
Now the idiot pitch. Dems say they believe additional government revenue should come from taxing rich people who aren't paying their fair share. They have argued the "Bush Tax Cuts" are not paid for and costs the federal government between $200-$300 Billion each year. The Bush tax cuts to households making over $250,000 a year accounts for only about $32 billion of that. Dems say there should not be any spending cuts to the middle class (including cuts to entitlements which represent 2/3 of all spending).
The big question: How does increasing taxes on the rich by $32 Billion annually solve a $1 Trillion deficit problem? Even Obama's math comes up short since this would only be 3.2% of the problem. Not to mention the $32 Billion tax increase would hit small businesses forcing layoffs and slowing plans to expand. That means fewer jobs.
To put this in perspective extending emergency unemployment benefits (put in place because of the terrible Obama economy) will cost about $5 billion per month or $60 Billion annually (twice the tax increase on the rich).
So what is our fearless leader in the White House focused on? He claims to have a mandate from the 98% of the people who make less than $200,000 to tax the 2% who make more and build businesses and hire people. He is obsessed with this single issue and his idiots are eating it up.
Just today the White House put out a press release about the dire consequences of the Republicans letting the "Bush Tax Cuts" expire for those making under $200,000. Just read this:
"Americans could spend nearly $200 billion less next year on cars, clothes, furniture and other consumer products than they would otherwise if automatic tax increases take effect as currently scheduled, the White House warned in a report issued Monday morning.
Such a crimp on demand would curb the growth of real consumer spending by 1.7 percentage points in 2013 and slow the growth of the overall economy by 1.4 percentage points, according to the report prepared by the President’s Council of Economic Advisers.
The White House released the report as part of an effort to turn up the pressure on Congress, which has barely a month to reach an agreement with President Obama on how to avoid the tax and spending changes or risk sending the nation back into recession."
Note the absurdity of this argument. If you don't raise taxes on employers (2%) we go over the cliff. If you do raise taxes on "the middle class" (98%) they will not spend money, and we will go over the cliff. So raise taxes on the rich gaining $32 Billion while losing the jobs and economic growth. Also, mark my word, Obama will say we shouldn't cut spending except on the military because the economy is weak. He will say he will cut later.
THE REAL TRUTH IS THIS IS ALL BULLSHIT. Obama doesn't want to solve the deficit problem. He wants the USA to go to its knees economically and the faster the better. He is only creating a scenario to blame the RICH AND THE REPUBLICANS for our decline. And the sad news is the idiots will eat it up.
Obama and his socialist followers are attacking the country, not only economically, but culturally (families and religion), and militarily (Middle East pullbacks and budget cuts, NOT TO MENTION WHAT HE IS DOING TO OUR MILITARY LEADERS).
I heard today that even PRAVDA is warning the US about our race to Communism. Obama doesn't want Communism because that would be too slow. He wants our destruction, and he wants it now.
Sorry, Jimbo, but that is the way it is.
BM
From: Jim in Austin
I am so confused about the fiscal cliff. Help?
To: Jim in Austin
From: Billy Roy in Hubbard
First, everyone in Austin is confused. It is that stupid communist newspaper, The Austin American Statesman (American my ass!).
Here is the net:
Our federal government has tax revenues annually of about $2.5 Trillion
Our federal government spends annually of about $3.5 Trillion
Even Biden knows this doesn't work. Now comes the politics aimed at the idiots (Biden included). Revenues come mostly from taxes. Republicans feel when taxes are low, the economy grows at more than the current anemic rate of 1.5% (should be more like 4%) because businesses and people invest and spend. They feel the larger the economy the more the federal government receives in tax revenues. Republicans believe the big problem is too much spending not too few taxes and an economy that is growing too slowly.
Now the idiot pitch. Dems say they believe additional government revenue should come from taxing rich people who aren't paying their fair share. They have argued the "Bush Tax Cuts" are not paid for and costs the federal government between $200-$300 Billion each year. The Bush tax cuts to households making over $250,000 a year accounts for only about $32 billion of that. Dems say there should not be any spending cuts to the middle class (including cuts to entitlements which represent 2/3 of all spending).
The big question: How does increasing taxes on the rich by $32 Billion annually solve a $1 Trillion deficit problem? Even Obama's math comes up short since this would only be 3.2% of the problem. Not to mention the $32 Billion tax increase would hit small businesses forcing layoffs and slowing plans to expand. That means fewer jobs.
To put this in perspective extending emergency unemployment benefits (put in place because of the terrible Obama economy) will cost about $5 billion per month or $60 Billion annually (twice the tax increase on the rich).
So what is our fearless leader in the White House focused on? He claims to have a mandate from the 98% of the people who make less than $200,000 to tax the 2% who make more and build businesses and hire people. He is obsessed with this single issue and his idiots are eating it up.
Just today the White House put out a press release about the dire consequences of the Republicans letting the "Bush Tax Cuts" expire for those making under $200,000. Just read this:
"Americans could spend nearly $200 billion less next year on cars, clothes, furniture and other consumer products than they would otherwise if automatic tax increases take effect as currently scheduled, the White House warned in a report issued Monday morning.
Such a crimp on demand would curb the growth of real consumer spending by 1.7 percentage points in 2013 and slow the growth of the overall economy by 1.4 percentage points, according to the report prepared by the President’s Council of Economic Advisers.
The White House released the report as part of an effort to turn up the pressure on Congress, which has barely a month to reach an agreement with President Obama on how to avoid the tax and spending changes or risk sending the nation back into recession."
Note the absurdity of this argument. If you don't raise taxes on employers (2%) we go over the cliff. If you do raise taxes on "the middle class" (98%) they will not spend money, and we will go over the cliff. So raise taxes on the rich gaining $32 Billion while losing the jobs and economic growth. Also, mark my word, Obama will say we shouldn't cut spending except on the military because the economy is weak. He will say he will cut later.
THE REAL TRUTH IS THIS IS ALL BULLSHIT. Obama doesn't want to solve the deficit problem. He wants the USA to go to its knees economically and the faster the better. He is only creating a scenario to blame the RICH AND THE REPUBLICANS for our decline. And the sad news is the idiots will eat it up.
Obama and his socialist followers are attacking the country, not only economically, but culturally (families and religion), and militarily (Middle East pullbacks and budget cuts, NOT TO MENTION WHAT HE IS DOING TO OUR MILITARY LEADERS).
I heard today that even PRAVDA is warning the US about our race to Communism. Obama doesn't want Communism because that would be too slow. He wants our destruction, and he wants it now.
Sorry, Jimbo, but that is the way it is.
BM
Saturday, November 10, 2012
My Heroes Are Almost Gone
Coming from a small Texas town most my heroes were athletes. At 70 years of age most of my heroes are gone. The next to last one passed away this week, Darrell K. Royal. In Austin he is just known as "Coach". I was fortunate enough to have friends who arranged a couple of golf games with Coach when I first arrived in Austin. These were some of the best experiences of my life.
Coach was a kind, tough, competitive gentleman, and a damn good golfer. We played at a fast, in fact, frenzied pace. When groups in front of us saw Coach coming they pulled their golf carts over to the side of the fairways and let us through. Not out of fear, but out of respect. After our golf games we went into the dining room for lunch and, Coach removed his golf cap. He expected others to do the same. It was not my practice at the time. It has been my practice ever since and will continue to be. Associations with Coach improved peoples lives. God bless him.
All of my other heroes except one are gone now. They include Mickey Mantle, Johnny Unitas, Don Meredith, and Tom Landry. I am not sure what qualities these gentlemen share that appealed to me so much. They were all great at what they did. They loved their professions. They were intelligent. They were fierce competitors. They were winners. They weren't perfect but they never let their fans down. They were just plain old fashioned heroes.
And to no ones surprise I have one hero from the political field, "The Gipper". Ronald Reagan served in politics as he played the role of the famed Notre Dame coach, Knute Rockne. He had every trait listed above and was gifted with the skills to communicate his values in simple understandable terms. He stood on his principles like a rock.
I have one female heroine, Audrey Hepburn. The actress who captured my attention in Breakfast At Tiffanys had many of the traits of the gentlemen, and she was gorgeous. She concluded her career serving the world in UNICEF. I made a sales call on them years ago in New York City and there was this huge picture in the lobby honoring her. She was the real thing.
I have one hero left, and he is not a sports hero. He is a minister for the Lord. His name is Billy Graham. He has the same traits: greatness, pride in his mission, intelligence, competitiveness (a genuine Christian soldier), a winner in every respect, and he till this day and at this advanced age, he has never let us down.
These are men we will never measure up to. I wouldn't want a hero who wasn't way better than me. However, we can strive to be just a little bit better by following their examples.
I had a feeling in the last couple of months that Mitt Romney could be one of my heroes. I think I see in him all the traits cited above. But, he lost his race. But then everyone of these other gentlemen lost at times as well. My hopes are that Mitt doesn't quit his service to this country. There are so many things he can do. He could take the leadership of a Conservative Republican Party. He could create an organization with a big cause maybe pulling together business leaders to influence those awful people in Washington.
How about campaigning for the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution? You know the one that says "powers not granted to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited to the States, are reserved to the States or the people". Powers outside of the Constitution are not granted to Obama and his thug Czars from Chicago nor are they granted to Liberal Judges, nor are they granted to a Democratic Senate (like forcing citizens to buy health insurance with other taxpayers money). With Mitt's contacts and clout he could create a movement like the Tea Party, call it something like "Feds Suck". OK, maybe that's not the name but you know what I mean. This organization could lawyer up and sue the bastards every time they violate the 10th, which happens allot.
I would be interested in your heroes or your ideas as to what Mitt should do. Drop me an email and let me know. Heck, maybe we bundle them up and send them to Mitt.
Meanwhile, thanks for trying Mitt. And thanks for everything, COACH.
Jim
Coach was a kind, tough, competitive gentleman, and a damn good golfer. We played at a fast, in fact, frenzied pace. When groups in front of us saw Coach coming they pulled their golf carts over to the side of the fairways and let us through. Not out of fear, but out of respect. After our golf games we went into the dining room for lunch and, Coach removed his golf cap. He expected others to do the same. It was not my practice at the time. It has been my practice ever since and will continue to be. Associations with Coach improved peoples lives. God bless him.
All of my other heroes except one are gone now. They include Mickey Mantle, Johnny Unitas, Don Meredith, and Tom Landry. I am not sure what qualities these gentlemen share that appealed to me so much. They were all great at what they did. They loved their professions. They were intelligent. They were fierce competitors. They were winners. They weren't perfect but they never let their fans down. They were just plain old fashioned heroes.
And to no ones surprise I have one hero from the political field, "The Gipper". Ronald Reagan served in politics as he played the role of the famed Notre Dame coach, Knute Rockne. He had every trait listed above and was gifted with the skills to communicate his values in simple understandable terms. He stood on his principles like a rock.
I have one female heroine, Audrey Hepburn. The actress who captured my attention in Breakfast At Tiffanys had many of the traits of the gentlemen, and she was gorgeous. She concluded her career serving the world in UNICEF. I made a sales call on them years ago in New York City and there was this huge picture in the lobby honoring her. She was the real thing.
I have one hero left, and he is not a sports hero. He is a minister for the Lord. His name is Billy Graham. He has the same traits: greatness, pride in his mission, intelligence, competitiveness (a genuine Christian soldier), a winner in every respect, and he till this day and at this advanced age, he has never let us down.
These are men we will never measure up to. I wouldn't want a hero who wasn't way better than me. However, we can strive to be just a little bit better by following their examples.
I had a feeling in the last couple of months that Mitt Romney could be one of my heroes. I think I see in him all the traits cited above. But, he lost his race. But then everyone of these other gentlemen lost at times as well. My hopes are that Mitt doesn't quit his service to this country. There are so many things he can do. He could take the leadership of a Conservative Republican Party. He could create an organization with a big cause maybe pulling together business leaders to influence those awful people in Washington.
How about campaigning for the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution? You know the one that says "powers not granted to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited to the States, are reserved to the States or the people". Powers outside of the Constitution are not granted to Obama and his thug Czars from Chicago nor are they granted to Liberal Judges, nor are they granted to a Democratic Senate (like forcing citizens to buy health insurance with other taxpayers money). With Mitt's contacts and clout he could create a movement like the Tea Party, call it something like "Feds Suck". OK, maybe that's not the name but you know what I mean. This organization could lawyer up and sue the bastards every time they violate the 10th, which happens allot.
I would be interested in your heroes or your ideas as to what Mitt should do. Drop me an email and let me know. Heck, maybe we bundle them up and send them to Mitt.
Meanwhile, thanks for trying Mitt. And thanks for everything, COACH.
Jim
Friday, November 9, 2012
Why American Voters Chose To Arm Islamic Terrorists With Nukes
American voters by re-electing Obama have chosen to leave to our children and grandchildren a world with Extremist Islamic Terrorists armed with nuclear weapons. How does this happen? Pretty simple.
Iranian born Valerie Jarrett arranges a one to one meeting between Obama and the Iranian Supreme Mullah (now that Obama is through the election AND HAS MORE FLEXIBILITY- REMEMBER THIS WITH THE RUSSIANS?). These two come to an agreement in which the Middle East Leader of Islamic Terrorism makes public concessions that give the impression of only developing nuclear capabilities for peaceful means. Meanwhile the Iranians continue their development while reinforcing their capability beneath the ground and out of reach of Israeli bombing.
The world applauds Obama's peace efforts and the Iranians return to sanity. Obama gets his second Nobel Peace Prize. Israel has no ally left that would support any kind of a preemptive strike. Issue closed. Israel is toast, first. Others come later.
Three years later the Iranians have nukes. They arm their friends just as they have provided assistance in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, etc. in killing Americans. Now back to today's headline, "Islamic Terrorists are armed with Nukes."
But there was more to the headlines. It also posed the question, "Why American Voters chose to do so." This explanation is not as simple. There are many, many reasons.
Resons such as:
1. Protecting a woman's right to choose
2. Supporting gay marriage
3. Protecting against any efforts to save Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security
4. To force rich people to pay their fair share while protecting "Obama's middle class" who pay no taxes
5. To continue to get "my stuff" from Obama. Stuff defined as food, housing, contraceptives, free health care, education, and spending money
6. To continue to protect illegal immigration by keeping our borders open and not enforcing our laws
7. To stop any efforts to be the guardian and leader of the free world by withdrawing and shrinking our military when we can use that money to get more "Obama stuff"
8. Because our re-elected President is a black man and we owe them that
9. Because I am not an old rich white man and feel that Obama understands me better
10. Because Obama loans me money to goof off in college and never expects me to pay it back
11. Because 3 million Republicans, who voted for John McCain, had better things to do than to vote
12. Because Mitt Romney is a rich, white guy who is guilty of a felony by having illegal bank accounts in other countries and founded and ran a company that raided small businesses, laid off the workers who had to drop their insurance resulting in the death of their wives, sent jobs to China, and made millions of illegal dollars to send illegally to foreign bank accounts (oops, I had already said that once, but you know what I mean, HE IS JUST PLAIN EVIL!). Besides, he never released 100 years of income tax returns and would not answer the question, "Have you stopped beating Ann Romney?"
The list goes on and on. These are just a few of the reasons why smart, good, hardworking Americans, "Chose to arm Islamic Terrorists with nukes."
So what do we do? We don't quit fighting. But we do have our work cut out for us.
Think about it and spread the word. The fight ain't over.
Jim
P.S. This quote came from the Czech Republic. Someone over there has it figured out. It was translated into English from an article in the Prague newspaper Prager Zeitungon.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president."
Iranian born Valerie Jarrett arranges a one to one meeting between Obama and the Iranian Supreme Mullah (now that Obama is through the election AND HAS MORE FLEXIBILITY- REMEMBER THIS WITH THE RUSSIANS?). These two come to an agreement in which the Middle East Leader of Islamic Terrorism makes public concessions that give the impression of only developing nuclear capabilities for peaceful means. Meanwhile the Iranians continue their development while reinforcing their capability beneath the ground and out of reach of Israeli bombing.
The world applauds Obama's peace efforts and the Iranians return to sanity. Obama gets his second Nobel Peace Prize. Israel has no ally left that would support any kind of a preemptive strike. Issue closed. Israel is toast, first. Others come later.
Three years later the Iranians have nukes. They arm their friends just as they have provided assistance in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, etc. in killing Americans. Now back to today's headline, "Islamic Terrorists are armed with Nukes."
But there was more to the headlines. It also posed the question, "Why American Voters chose to do so." This explanation is not as simple. There are many, many reasons.
Resons such as:
1. Protecting a woman's right to choose
2. Supporting gay marriage
3. Protecting against any efforts to save Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security
4. To force rich people to pay their fair share while protecting "Obama's middle class" who pay no taxes
5. To continue to get "my stuff" from Obama. Stuff defined as food, housing, contraceptives, free health care, education, and spending money
6. To continue to protect illegal immigration by keeping our borders open and not enforcing our laws
7. To stop any efforts to be the guardian and leader of the free world by withdrawing and shrinking our military when we can use that money to get more "Obama stuff"
8. Because our re-elected President is a black man and we owe them that
9. Because I am not an old rich white man and feel that Obama understands me better
10. Because Obama loans me money to goof off in college and never expects me to pay it back
11. Because 3 million Republicans, who voted for John McCain, had better things to do than to vote
12. Because Mitt Romney is a rich, white guy who is guilty of a felony by having illegal bank accounts in other countries and founded and ran a company that raided small businesses, laid off the workers who had to drop their insurance resulting in the death of their wives, sent jobs to China, and made millions of illegal dollars to send illegally to foreign bank accounts (oops, I had already said that once, but you know what I mean, HE IS JUST PLAIN EVIL!). Besides, he never released 100 years of income tax returns and would not answer the question, "Have you stopped beating Ann Romney?"
The list goes on and on. These are just a few of the reasons why smart, good, hardworking Americans, "Chose to arm Islamic Terrorists with nukes."
So what do we do? We don't quit fighting. But we do have our work cut out for us.
Think about it and spread the word. The fight ain't over.
Jim
P.S. This quote came from the Czech Republic. Someone over there has it figured out. It was translated into English from an article in the Prague newspaper Prager Zeitungon.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president."
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Pre-Election Letter From the Chairman of the Hubbard City Cafe
November 4, 2012
Jim,
Well these months of worrying about an Obama re-election and praying for a national wake up call come to an end on Tuesday of next week. Not sure how you feel about it but I can't help but feel downright sad. Sad that those who love this country and believe the founding fathers were geniuses are having to work so hard to preserve the principles that have made us the greatest and most honorable nation in world history.
I do believe that we have a slightly better than 50/50 chance to attempt to save the United States of America as we know it by electing Mitt Romney, but what a crying shame that it is this close. With it this close you can't help but think of what a calamity it will be if the other side sneaks out a slight electoral advantage and continues the destruction of the last four years.
Just look at current events:
1. A leftist, muslim leaning, anti-colonialist (anti-American) has near 50% of Americans cheering for his re-election as the leader of the free world.
2. There was no mention of Benghazi in Sunday's political shows covering up what will more than likely be the greatest political scandal in our life time. On the other hand if Romney is going to dodge the Benghazi murders, it makes it hard to fault the press. McCain and Fox are doing all they can to keep this in the news. If Romney wins on Tuesday his high road strategy was brilliant. If he loses, he blew it by not taking Obama on regarding Benghazi. In either case Obama is breathing a sigh of relief by not having to invent more lies to cover up those already spewed.
3. Three states (Maryland, Maine, and Washington) go to the polls to vote on allowing gay men and women to have full marriage rights. No state has passed this measure to date (only activist judges) but it seems they get closer and closer. With the current divorce rate and unwed mothers with welfare children all we need is to weaken God's sanctification of marriage even more.
4. Five states will vote Tuesday to legalize marijuana. Two (Arkansas and Massachusetts) are claiming its medical benefits, and three (Oregon, Washington, and Colorado) are calling it "recreational". As if young brains aren't weak enough now we need "recreation like this" to make them complete mush?
5. None other than Chris Christie praises Obama for talking to him on the phone, coming to New Jersey for photo ops that stop the pummeling he is taking from Mitt Romney, and for giving him millions and millions of dollars that Obama and we tax payers don't have for reconstruction of New Jersey in the aftermath of the storm. Sunday's talk shows praised Obama's bi-partisanship and his polls showing a 64% approval rating in handling the crisis. I hope Republicans remember this the next time Christie needs our support. To help re-elect Obama in a blatant act to get more federal aid for your state is what makes folks at the Cafe sick of politics and phony conservative politicians.
6. Reports circling the Internet are giving details of a May 2012 meeting with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi headlining a Democratic FUND RAISER to take money from Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood front groups. The participating groups published plans to defeat people like Allen West in Florida. Pelosi condemned Republicans Islamaphobes. Meanwhile Harry Reid announced this week that if Mitt Romney thought the Democrats would compromise with him if elected he was out of his mind. All of this as proof Liberals hate Republicans more than those who would destroy our country.
With these current events less than 60% of Americans believe we are going in the wrong direction. Put the negative way, over 40% believe the country is headed in the right direction. So why do I feel downright sad? Just seems like this great country has more things to worry about then destroying marriage, destroying young minds with dope, and redistributing things from good people to freeloaders, muslim terrorists, and crooked politicians.
Sad or not, this old cowboy ain't going to quit fighting. Tuesday is going to tell us just how big a fight we've got on our hands. In any case, the folks at the cafe ain't done. Real Americans will always find a way.
As always, hope you are making some headway with those do nothin, scum sucking Libs in our state capital.
Sincerely,
Billy Roy Michum
Unofficial Chairman and C&W Singer of Some Local Renown,
Home Officed at the Hubbard City Cafe
Jim,
Well these months of worrying about an Obama re-election and praying for a national wake up call come to an end on Tuesday of next week. Not sure how you feel about it but I can't help but feel downright sad. Sad that those who love this country and believe the founding fathers were geniuses are having to work so hard to preserve the principles that have made us the greatest and most honorable nation in world history.
I do believe that we have a slightly better than 50/50 chance to attempt to save the United States of America as we know it by electing Mitt Romney, but what a crying shame that it is this close. With it this close you can't help but think of what a calamity it will be if the other side sneaks out a slight electoral advantage and continues the destruction of the last four years.
Just look at current events:
1. A leftist, muslim leaning, anti-colonialist (anti-American) has near 50% of Americans cheering for his re-election as the leader of the free world.
2. There was no mention of Benghazi in Sunday's political shows covering up what will more than likely be the greatest political scandal in our life time. On the other hand if Romney is going to dodge the Benghazi murders, it makes it hard to fault the press. McCain and Fox are doing all they can to keep this in the news. If Romney wins on Tuesday his high road strategy was brilliant. If he loses, he blew it by not taking Obama on regarding Benghazi. In either case Obama is breathing a sigh of relief by not having to invent more lies to cover up those already spewed.
3. Three states (Maryland, Maine, and Washington) go to the polls to vote on allowing gay men and women to have full marriage rights. No state has passed this measure to date (only activist judges) but it seems they get closer and closer. With the current divorce rate and unwed mothers with welfare children all we need is to weaken God's sanctification of marriage even more.
4. Five states will vote Tuesday to legalize marijuana. Two (Arkansas and Massachusetts) are claiming its medical benefits, and three (Oregon, Washington, and Colorado) are calling it "recreational". As if young brains aren't weak enough now we need "recreation like this" to make them complete mush?
5. None other than Chris Christie praises Obama for talking to him on the phone, coming to New Jersey for photo ops that stop the pummeling he is taking from Mitt Romney, and for giving him millions and millions of dollars that Obama and we tax payers don't have for reconstruction of New Jersey in the aftermath of the storm. Sunday's talk shows praised Obama's bi-partisanship and his polls showing a 64% approval rating in handling the crisis. I hope Republicans remember this the next time Christie needs our support. To help re-elect Obama in a blatant act to get more federal aid for your state is what makes folks at the Cafe sick of politics and phony conservative politicians.
6. Reports circling the Internet are giving details of a May 2012 meeting with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi headlining a Democratic FUND RAISER to take money from Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood front groups. The participating groups published plans to defeat people like Allen West in Florida. Pelosi condemned Republicans Islamaphobes. Meanwhile Harry Reid announced this week that if Mitt Romney thought the Democrats would compromise with him if elected he was out of his mind. All of this as proof Liberals hate Republicans more than those who would destroy our country.
With these current events less than 60% of Americans believe we are going in the wrong direction. Put the negative way, over 40% believe the country is headed in the right direction. So why do I feel downright sad? Just seems like this great country has more things to worry about then destroying marriage, destroying young minds with dope, and redistributing things from good people to freeloaders, muslim terrorists, and crooked politicians.
Sad or not, this old cowboy ain't going to quit fighting. Tuesday is going to tell us just how big a fight we've got on our hands. In any case, the folks at the cafe ain't done. Real Americans will always find a way.
As always, hope you are making some headway with those do nothin, scum sucking Libs in our state capital.
Sincerely,
Billy Roy Michum
Unofficial Chairman and C&W Singer of Some Local Renown,
Home Officed at the Hubbard City Cafe
Monday, October 22, 2012
Billy Roy Warns Against a Big Time October Surprise
As the news reports, retracts, and re-reports possible deals with Iran only weeks away from the election, I asked Billy Roy if he expected an "October Surprise". BM promised a face to face discussion this next weekend when I will attend the Hubbard High School Homecoming festivities. I will be the featured speaker at a meeting to honor (roast) a Hubbard legend, also known as Gut Anderson. Gut was an amazing athlete big enough and strong enough to throw the shot put in track and annihilate an opposing team in football as he anchored the middle of the line. He also was fast and nimble enough to compete as a pole vaulter, not to mention his fame as a baseball pitcher with a blazing fastball. But I diverge from our "October Surprise".
"Jim, there is no question the Dems are loading their cannons as we speak to attempt to shock voters at the eleventh hour back into the Obama camp. They are only waiting until they are sure there is not enough time for the Romney camp to respond to the bullshit. These Chicago thugs will go deep and dirty. Axlerod has a history of destroying his candidate's opponents in large urban areas where he has mostly represented Black mayors. I asked Butch Jackson, local finder of facts, to pull previous October Surprises. He went to the Dick Morris site and found the following:
From Dick Morris:
Let's remember the history of Democratic October Surprises. Of the past five elections, two have been won solidly by Democrats - 2004 and 1996. The other three all featured October Surprises:
• On October 30, 1992, Iran-Contra Special Prosecutor Lawrence E. Walsh announced that he would indict Bush Defense Secretary Cap Weinberger. The announcement came after Clinton, the Democratic candidate against Bush, had fallen behind in the tracking polls. Clinton surged on the final weekend and won the election, in large part because of the Weinberger indictment announcement. (Bush pardoned Weinberger after the election and he was never actually indicted).
• On October 1, 2000, it was revealed that George W. Bush had been arrested for DUI in Maine in 1976. The arrest had never been made public. Bush was several points ahead in the popular vote prior to the announcement but lost to Gore by 0.5% after the DUI story broke.
• Eight days before the 2004 election, the New York Times revealed that the weapons from a conquered Iraqi weapons dump had been looted by insurgents who were using these weapons against American troops. Democratic candidate John Kerry cancelled his regular TV ads to focus on the discovery and allege Bush Administration incompetence in protecting the weapons. Fortunately, four days later (and four before the election), the Pentagon issues satellite photos of the dump indicating that the story was false.
• The original October Surprise was pulled by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger on behalf of President Richard M. Nixon when he announced that peace in Vietnam was "at hand" on the eve of the 1972 election, only to see the war drag on for months more.
If there be any of us that doubt the potential of both this Administration and the Ayatollah for using chicanery and phony deals to impact the election's outcome, think again!
Meanwhile on the verge of our Foreign Policy debate we find out we had a Drone viewing the planned terrorist attack on Benghazi. Additionally, even the Associated Press is reporting Al Qaeda is flooding back into Afghanistan from Pakistan as we reduce our troop levels in our announced withdrawal. Experts are predicting Yemen will be the first nation to be run by Al Qaeda as bombing attempts are rampant from New York City to Jordan. Seems like Obama has Al Qaeda on the run but they are running in planned attacks on our friends around the world. Obama's plan to allow militant Muslims to gain "justice" is working.
Romney's first statement tonight should be, "Where do I start?"
Jim
"Jim, there is no question the Dems are loading their cannons as we speak to attempt to shock voters at the eleventh hour back into the Obama camp. They are only waiting until they are sure there is not enough time for the Romney camp to respond to the bullshit. These Chicago thugs will go deep and dirty. Axlerod has a history of destroying his candidate's opponents in large urban areas where he has mostly represented Black mayors. I asked Butch Jackson, local finder of facts, to pull previous October Surprises. He went to the Dick Morris site and found the following:
From Dick Morris:
Let's remember the history of Democratic October Surprises. Of the past five elections, two have been won solidly by Democrats - 2004 and 1996. The other three all featured October Surprises:
• On October 30, 1992, Iran-Contra Special Prosecutor Lawrence E. Walsh announced that he would indict Bush Defense Secretary Cap Weinberger. The announcement came after Clinton, the Democratic candidate against Bush, had fallen behind in the tracking polls. Clinton surged on the final weekend and won the election, in large part because of the Weinberger indictment announcement. (Bush pardoned Weinberger after the election and he was never actually indicted).
• On October 1, 2000, it was revealed that George W. Bush had been arrested for DUI in Maine in 1976. The arrest had never been made public. Bush was several points ahead in the popular vote prior to the announcement but lost to Gore by 0.5% after the DUI story broke.
• Eight days before the 2004 election, the New York Times revealed that the weapons from a conquered Iraqi weapons dump had been looted by insurgents who were using these weapons against American troops. Democratic candidate John Kerry cancelled his regular TV ads to focus on the discovery and allege Bush Administration incompetence in protecting the weapons. Fortunately, four days later (and four before the election), the Pentagon issues satellite photos of the dump indicating that the story was false.
• The original October Surprise was pulled by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger on behalf of President Richard M. Nixon when he announced that peace in Vietnam was "at hand" on the eve of the 1972 election, only to see the war drag on for months more.
If there be any of us that doubt the potential of both this Administration and the Ayatollah for using chicanery and phony deals to impact the election's outcome, think again!
Meanwhile on the verge of our Foreign Policy debate we find out we had a Drone viewing the planned terrorist attack on Benghazi. Additionally, even the Associated Press is reporting Al Qaeda is flooding back into Afghanistan from Pakistan as we reduce our troop levels in our announced withdrawal. Experts are predicting Yemen will be the first nation to be run by Al Qaeda as bombing attempts are rampant from New York City to Jordan. Seems like Obama has Al Qaeda on the run but they are running in planned attacks on our friends around the world. Obama's plan to allow militant Muslims to gain "justice" is working.
Romney's first statement tonight should be, "Where do I start?"
Jim
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
The Incompetents Latest Move To Get The Moron Vote
The Obama Incompetents have evolved their story (now called narrative by the elites) about Benghazi. Why? They are afraid even moronic voters are fleeing this sinking ship as more and more stories of incompetence and cover up come out each day. Moronic voters, in my definition, are those who have a mental age of from 7 to 12 years when it comes to political knowledge. Mental ages in the teens and higher will vote against Obama.
Here is the latest. To understand their strategy try to dumb down to the moron level so you can relate to their latest ploy. The Secretary of State, Hillary (stand by your man) Clinton, tells CNN the following:
1. The Benghazi situation is my organizational responsibility (not my fault, though).
2. My consulate organizations number over 240 (it is impossible for anyone to keep up with this amount of detail).
3. The President and Vice President were not informed of the security details of these 240 consulates (the buck doesn't stop there, either).
4. We have "career professionals" who are really responsible for security for our consulates (Note that these are not political appointees like me, the Secretary of State. These little people are honest and real buck stoppers.).
5. My greatest hope is that no one uses this tragic event to attempt to gain some political advantage (that would be you, Mitt Romney, if you bring it up in tomorrow night's debate you are shameless).
6. I would now hope we can all focus on investigating this incident to take revenge against the attackers and learn so that this is not repeated (and hopefully this stays quiet until after the election)
7. And then of course, this is backed up by Obama saying during he debate he is responsible for everything (which is nothing), and that he called Benghazi a terrorist attack in the rose garden the day after the attack (a whopper).
Morons of the political world, and particularly of the electorate, eat this up. This same ploy worked when the little girl in the blue dress blew the whistle on Hillary's husband. In other words, this is a tried and true approach that works with the press and with morons.
Let's break this down. Does the buck stop with the President when it comes to protecting those who serve our nation in dangerous federal assignments? Of the 240 consulates facing 911 which were in the most danger? Was Libya, which had reported hundreds of incidents (including blowing a huge hole in the fence surrounding the consulate), on the most dangerous list? Was this the type of topic discussed in White House Security Briefings? If not, why not? Was it discussed with the Secretary of State?
The attack was reported in real time as it happened. Who was notified and when? If the security people misled the administration initially, when did they correct their assessment? How did administration spokes people, including Obama, have it wrong for almost two weeks? When asked by the View women, "Was this a terrorist attack, why did the President say we don't know yet?" Why were administration spokes people political appointees (Clinton, Rice, Axelrod, etc.) instead of career intel professionals?
The truth is once the administration screwed up by not responding to warnings for more security Obama's campaign advisers took over. They created their story, hoped to launch a long investigation, and put the issue to bed until after the election. They thought it would work if the press would just co-operate. And it would have if it hadn't been for those pesky little debates with 60.000.000 viewers hearing about Benghazi first hand.
Again, if the administration is this incompetent, fire them. If they are covering up, fire them. If both are true (which is the case), fire them all.
Today, Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod are running the country, period. They have only one goal to re-elect Obama so he can finish his task of ruining (reforming) this country.
Today the campaign had four administration officials, speaking off the record of course, inform the press of Obama's aggressive plans to find and kill those responsible for Benghazi. Every pharmaceutical factory in Libya is on alert. Why? Remember when Bill Clinton bombed such after the embassy bombing in Nairobi? It was a way to change the subject, and say, hey, we did something. What top security team would alert the terrorist in newspapers that we are coming?
Folks, this is a very sad affair. Four great Americans are dead. Obama got the briefing and went to Las Vegas to campaign. Axelrod and Jarrett covered him. Hillary stood by her new man yesterday. Patreaus and other intel people are accomplices by their silence. The debate narrator came to Obama's aid tonight. Mitt Romney let Obama off the hook in the town hall debate. Sandra Crawley, the narrator, helped. However, Monday night is the foreign affairs debate. My guess is Romney will make it about Benghazi exposing the facts, lies, and cover up. He will show it is symptomatic of Obama's failing policies.
Obama's last resort in campaigning is all aimed at the morons needed to keep the elite in power.
It won't work. When you are this incompetent and deceitful even the morons listen to Clint Eastwood, WHEN YOU DON'T DO THE JOB, YOU HAVE TO GO.
Jim
Here is the latest. To understand their strategy try to dumb down to the moron level so you can relate to their latest ploy. The Secretary of State, Hillary (stand by your man) Clinton, tells CNN the following:
1. The Benghazi situation is my organizational responsibility (not my fault, though).
2. My consulate organizations number over 240 (it is impossible for anyone to keep up with this amount of detail).
3. The President and Vice President were not informed of the security details of these 240 consulates (the buck doesn't stop there, either).
4. We have "career professionals" who are really responsible for security for our consulates (Note that these are not political appointees like me, the Secretary of State. These little people are honest and real buck stoppers.).
5. My greatest hope is that no one uses this tragic event to attempt to gain some political advantage (that would be you, Mitt Romney, if you bring it up in tomorrow night's debate you are shameless).
6. I would now hope we can all focus on investigating this incident to take revenge against the attackers and learn so that this is not repeated (and hopefully this stays quiet until after the election)
7. And then of course, this is backed up by Obama saying during he debate he is responsible for everything (which is nothing), and that he called Benghazi a terrorist attack in the rose garden the day after the attack (a whopper).
Morons of the political world, and particularly of the electorate, eat this up. This same ploy worked when the little girl in the blue dress blew the whistle on Hillary's husband. In other words, this is a tried and true approach that works with the press and with morons.
Let's break this down. Does the buck stop with the President when it comes to protecting those who serve our nation in dangerous federal assignments? Of the 240 consulates facing 911 which were in the most danger? Was Libya, which had reported hundreds of incidents (including blowing a huge hole in the fence surrounding the consulate), on the most dangerous list? Was this the type of topic discussed in White House Security Briefings? If not, why not? Was it discussed with the Secretary of State?
The attack was reported in real time as it happened. Who was notified and when? If the security people misled the administration initially, when did they correct their assessment? How did administration spokes people, including Obama, have it wrong for almost two weeks? When asked by the View women, "Was this a terrorist attack, why did the President say we don't know yet?" Why were administration spokes people political appointees (Clinton, Rice, Axelrod, etc.) instead of career intel professionals?
The truth is once the administration screwed up by not responding to warnings for more security Obama's campaign advisers took over. They created their story, hoped to launch a long investigation, and put the issue to bed until after the election. They thought it would work if the press would just co-operate. And it would have if it hadn't been for those pesky little debates with 60.000.000 viewers hearing about Benghazi first hand.
Again, if the administration is this incompetent, fire them. If they are covering up, fire them. If both are true (which is the case), fire them all.
Today, Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod are running the country, period. They have only one goal to re-elect Obama so he can finish his task of ruining (reforming) this country.
Today the campaign had four administration officials, speaking off the record of course, inform the press of Obama's aggressive plans to find and kill those responsible for Benghazi. Every pharmaceutical factory in Libya is on alert. Why? Remember when Bill Clinton bombed such after the embassy bombing in Nairobi? It was a way to change the subject, and say, hey, we did something. What top security team would alert the terrorist in newspapers that we are coming?
Folks, this is a very sad affair. Four great Americans are dead. Obama got the briefing and went to Las Vegas to campaign. Axelrod and Jarrett covered him. Hillary stood by her new man yesterday. Patreaus and other intel people are accomplices by their silence. The debate narrator came to Obama's aid tonight. Mitt Romney let Obama off the hook in the town hall debate. Sandra Crawley, the narrator, helped. However, Monday night is the foreign affairs debate. My guess is Romney will make it about Benghazi exposing the facts, lies, and cover up. He will show it is symptomatic of Obama's failing policies.
Obama's last resort in campaigning is all aimed at the morons needed to keep the elite in power.
It won't work. When you are this incompetent and deceitful even the morons listen to Clint Eastwood, WHEN YOU DON'T DO THE JOB, YOU HAVE TO GO.
Jim
Friday, October 12, 2012
"The Donald Trump Principle" Can End This Race
With debates, ambassador murders, and political discourse dominated by
claims of lies, lies, and more lies I thought it was time to check in with
Billy Roy, the unofficial Chairman of the Hubbard City Cafe. My question was
pretty simple and pretty direct. "BM, where is all this going?"
"This race is about over. One of the Republicans is going to trip on
what I call the 'Donald Trump Principle' and it just has to happen real soon.
When it does this race is over."
"Can't wait, BM. Lay it on me."
"It is about Benghazi, Jim. Ryan could have ended the race last night.
Romney could end it on Tuesday. It is this simple. Mr. President, assuming you
are telling the truth about Benghazi that you, Biden, Clinton (State
Department), Petraeus (CIA), and your other security leaders did not know about
the terrorist attack until about two weeks after it happened and that you
thought during this period of time it was a spontaneous demonstration about a
video that turned into an attack. Again, giving you the benefit of the doubt
that you are telling the truth that you, Biden, Clinton, Petraeus and security
crew did not know our consulate people were in danger and asking for additional
security as we approached the 911 anniversary. AGAIN, GIVING YOU THE BENEFIT OF
A DOUBT THEN YOU, BIDEN, CLINTON, PATRAEUS AND CREW SHOULD ALL BE FIRED
IMMEDIATELY FOR YOUR TOTAL INCOMPETENCE. ANY FOOL KNEW WITHIN DAYS, IF NOT
HOURS, THIS WAS A PLANNED ATTACK. ANY FOOL KNEW BENGHAZI WAS A DANGEROUS PLACE
AND THAT OUR AMBASSODOR NEEDED A FULL FORCE OF MARINES AND TOP SECURITY GUARDS
ALONG WITH FORTIFIED FACILITIES. FIRE THOSE IN CHARGE. WE CANNOT HAVE
INCOMPETENTS LIKE THIS IN CHARGE DURING THESE DANGEROUS TIMES."
"Now, Jim, let's explore the alternative. What if Obama, Biden,
Clinton, Petraeus, and the security leaders were lying about what they knew and
when they knew. In other words they were covering up the truth because it was
not convenient to support their claims that Obama had killed Bin Laden and had
Al Qaeda on the run which drove up his poll numbers before this election. So if
they are really competent but liars and colluding on a political cover-up to
keep the truth from American voters then guess what? OBAMA, BIDEN, CLINTON,
PATRAEUS, AND THE SECURITY CREW NEED TO BE FIRED IMMEDIATELY. RACE OVER!"
"BM, you might just have something here. If Donald Trump wouldn't put
up with this, why should the American people? And they won’t put up with either
the incompetence or the deceit if Mitt Romney will make the charge. The Chicago
thugs have trapped themselves."
It couldn’t happen to a worse group of people,
Jim
Monday, October 1, 2012
Anyone But Us and the US!!!
As any intelligent American fumes over the murder of our people in Libya, and even more so, the total and despicable cover up by Obama, Hillary, Rice, and the other thugs in some ways it distracts us from the BIG PICTURE which is even scarier. Most would say Obama and crew are lying about Libya because it tarnishes the Democratic claim of killing Bin Laden and the near annihilation of Al Queda that was put forth by most speakers and celebrated only two weeks ago at the Democratic Convention. The BIG TRUTH is much worse.
Obama and his inner circle (probably it doesn't even include Hillary who like Bill is a pawn) are working to keep all Americans from grasping their clear desire and strategy to bring down the United States of America. That would be us (meaning you and I) and US (meaning our country). And they have taken huge steps to do just that.
Let's start by looking at the two most important goals we SHOULD have in our foreign affairs (you could also call it Defense). First, the most important goal is to keep Americans safe from attack, and particularly from unconventional weapons (mass destructive and nuclear weapons). Secondly, the US must keep foreign oil from falling into the hands of bad guys who would stop the free trade of such. Why? Because not just the US but the entire world economy runs on fossil fuel energy, and because 70% of the world's proven oil reserves are threatened in the Middle East by very bad people.
Next, let's understand Obama. For what ever reasons (revolutionary, anti-colonial, corporatist, socialist, communist, or muslim), HE CLEARLY BELIEVES IN HIS BONES THAT THE USA IS THE BAD GUY! Therefore, helping anyone else against the USA, and us, is a good thing!
Proof? Let's look at Obama's actions in the Middle East and Northern Africa. Obama supported the Arab Spring uprisings and overthrow of leaders in the following countries: Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen. What did they have in common? They were allies of the USA. Yep, even Qaddafi in his later years. Many were dictators and strongmen, but still allies. Also, mostly, they kept the terrorists under control.
Let's now look at Obama's "in-actions" where he has given no support in the same type of uprisings: Iran and Syria. What do they have in common? They are both anti-American and anti-Israel. We never lifted a finger in Iran knowing the people in the street would be less dangerous than the current mullahs and dictator who soon will have nuclear weapons. In Libya we stepped in when a few hundred people were killed by Qaddafi. In Syria we sit on the fence while Assad kills 20,000-30,000 people with the assistance of Iran and the Russians.
How about Iraq and Afghanistan where the Bush administration declared you are either for the USA or against us? If against us, we will not let you harbor terrorists. Our troops have been giving their lives in a War Against Muslim Terrorists. Obama pulls out of Iraq on schedule, BUT offers such a small residual force to the newly elected leadership they reject any American forces. In fact they feel their only choice is to cooperate with Iran (where they are currently allowing flyovers to Syria). Next, how about Obama's "good war" where we will fight Al Queda, our real enemy. Obama rarely mentions the Taliban who our troops are really fighting because he hopes to negotiate a settlement with them and pull our troops out. Obama condemns the elected President Karzai, an American and Bush friend, as corrupt. Just this Sunday on 60 Minutes Karzai proclaimed his dislike of Obama who has disengaged from the defense of Afghanistan in Karzai's battle with terrorists. Even American General on the same program admitted Al Queda was back empowering the Taliban against our troops, and that Obama's announced departure date hung over his head every day.
Soon we will be gone from both countries and our loss of blood and money will be squandered purposely in Obama's scheme to weaken the real BAD GUY (that would be us and US).
If you still have any doubt about Obama's hatred of American allies you have to look no further than his treatment of Netanyahu and the Israelis. Many think they are are best friend and ally. In the world of Obama they are literally TOAST, and soon.
Clearly taking these actions and their end results into consideration let's go back to our two most important foreign policy goals. HAS OBAMA'S ACTIONS DELIBERATELY MADE AMERICANS LESS SAFE FROM WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND NUCLEAR MUSLIM EXTREMISTS? HAS OBAMA'S DELIBERATE ACTIONS PUT THE WORLD'S OIL SUPPLY AT RISK IN AN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY THE INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS?
Is Obama that smart and that evil or is he that dumb and incompetent? DOES IT MATTER? As they say, "it is what it is."
We have less than 60 days to save the greatest nation in the world.
Think about it,
Jim
P. S. This Wednesday night Obama will attempt to debate a ficticious "strawman" created by Axlerod. Romney will attempt to debate Obama. Say your prayers.
Obama and his inner circle (probably it doesn't even include Hillary who like Bill is a pawn) are working to keep all Americans from grasping their clear desire and strategy to bring down the United States of America. That would be us (meaning you and I) and US (meaning our country). And they have taken huge steps to do just that.
Let's start by looking at the two most important goals we SHOULD have in our foreign affairs (you could also call it Defense). First, the most important goal is to keep Americans safe from attack, and particularly from unconventional weapons (mass destructive and nuclear weapons). Secondly, the US must keep foreign oil from falling into the hands of bad guys who would stop the free trade of such. Why? Because not just the US but the entire world economy runs on fossil fuel energy, and because 70% of the world's proven oil reserves are threatened in the Middle East by very bad people.
Next, let's understand Obama. For what ever reasons (revolutionary, anti-colonial, corporatist, socialist, communist, or muslim), HE CLEARLY BELIEVES IN HIS BONES THAT THE USA IS THE BAD GUY! Therefore, helping anyone else against the USA, and us, is a good thing!
Proof? Let's look at Obama's actions in the Middle East and Northern Africa. Obama supported the Arab Spring uprisings and overthrow of leaders in the following countries: Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen. What did they have in common? They were allies of the USA. Yep, even Qaddafi in his later years. Many were dictators and strongmen, but still allies. Also, mostly, they kept the terrorists under control.
Let's now look at Obama's "in-actions" where he has given no support in the same type of uprisings: Iran and Syria. What do they have in common? They are both anti-American and anti-Israel. We never lifted a finger in Iran knowing the people in the street would be less dangerous than the current mullahs and dictator who soon will have nuclear weapons. In Libya we stepped in when a few hundred people were killed by Qaddafi. In Syria we sit on the fence while Assad kills 20,000-30,000 people with the assistance of Iran and the Russians.
How about Iraq and Afghanistan where the Bush administration declared you are either for the USA or against us? If against us, we will not let you harbor terrorists. Our troops have been giving their lives in a War Against Muslim Terrorists. Obama pulls out of Iraq on schedule, BUT offers such a small residual force to the newly elected leadership they reject any American forces. In fact they feel their only choice is to cooperate with Iran (where they are currently allowing flyovers to Syria). Next, how about Obama's "good war" where we will fight Al Queda, our real enemy. Obama rarely mentions the Taliban who our troops are really fighting because he hopes to negotiate a settlement with them and pull our troops out. Obama condemns the elected President Karzai, an American and Bush friend, as corrupt. Just this Sunday on 60 Minutes Karzai proclaimed his dislike of Obama who has disengaged from the defense of Afghanistan in Karzai's battle with terrorists. Even American General on the same program admitted Al Queda was back empowering the Taliban against our troops, and that Obama's announced departure date hung over his head every day.
Soon we will be gone from both countries and our loss of blood and money will be squandered purposely in Obama's scheme to weaken the real BAD GUY (that would be us and US).
If you still have any doubt about Obama's hatred of American allies you have to look no further than his treatment of Netanyahu and the Israelis. Many think they are are best friend and ally. In the world of Obama they are literally TOAST, and soon.
Clearly taking these actions and their end results into consideration let's go back to our two most important foreign policy goals. HAS OBAMA'S ACTIONS DELIBERATELY MADE AMERICANS LESS SAFE FROM WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND NUCLEAR MUSLIM EXTREMISTS? HAS OBAMA'S DELIBERATE ACTIONS PUT THE WORLD'S OIL SUPPLY AT RISK IN AN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY THE INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS?
Is Obama that smart and that evil or is he that dumb and incompetent? DOES IT MATTER? As they say, "it is what it is."
We have less than 60 days to save the greatest nation in the world.
Think about it,
Jim
P. S. This Wednesday night Obama will attempt to debate a ficticious "strawman" created by Axlerod. Romney will attempt to debate Obama. Say your prayers.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Why Mitt Doesn't Carry His Old State?
Billy Roy Got a Letter:
Dear Billy Roy,
Dear Billy Roy,
My very left wing baby sister posed a question I can not answer. Maybe you can help. She wants to know if Mitt is so good, why is he behind 25% in the state where he was Governor? The only thing I could come up with was that they have their health care as much as the nation hates Obama Care. Any insight on this one?
Bobby Joe Biggers
Big Brother to A Little Sister Gone Loco
Big Brother to A Little Sister Gone Loco
Billy Roy's Response:
Dear Bobby Joe,
Dear Bobby Joe,
Sorry to hear about your little sister.
Massa-what-ever-it-is (never wanted to learn out to spell it) is like California and New York in that it is hugely, I mean hugely, Liberal. When they get in real trouble spending wildly and with excessive crime and lawlessness, they elect token Conservatives. NY does it with mayors and governors, like Rudy Giuliani and George Pataki. California did it with Reagan, and then tried it with Arnold Schwarzenegger (found out he was about as conservative as Obama is American). Ronald Reagan cleaned California up, and then they went back to their spending sprees.
Massa-what-ever-it-is (never wanted to learn out to spell it) is like California and New York in that it is hugely, I mean hugely, Liberal. When they get in real trouble spending wildly and with excessive crime and lawlessness, they elect token Conservatives. NY does it with mayors and governors, like Rudy Giuliani and George Pataki. California did it with Reagan, and then tried it with Arnold Schwarzenegger (found out he was about as conservative as Obama is American). Ronald Reagan cleaned California up, and then they went back to their spending sprees.
Same with Massachusetts. Romney cleaned up their debt and put them back on their feet. Mitt has been successful with every job he has had (not that 47% of Americans care).
Other entities, states, are doing this now. Ohio, Wisconsin, Florida, Virginia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, etc. (even Michigan). They have Republican governors to clean things up. It is sad that history tells us that once clean, they seem to drift back into their political give-a-ways and financial crisis.
Some of the Republican governors are not polling well even though they have turned their Liberal states around, like Wisconsin, Florida, and Ohio. Why?
To clean things up you have to say no to spending. This pisses people off and enables the Dems to demagogue big time. "Republicans cut spending so they can hurt women, children, education, air, water, poor people minorities, etc. Republicans, of course, do this so they can take care of their rich friends." Ever heard this before?
Hope this helps with your kin. Seems like every family has at least one that is wandering in the wilderness, off the reservation, or just plain ornery. Next time you are at the Cafe ask me about my cousin Looey.
Sincerely Yours,
Billy Roy Mitchum
Chairman of the Board
Hubbard City Cafe
Chairman of the Board
Hubbard City Cafe
Monday, September 17, 2012
The Obama Battlecry: DISENGAGE
dis·en·gage
Time and again I hear real folks say, "Are we insane? Do people really believe the crap coming out of the Obama Administration and the mainstream press (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, NY Times, Washington Post, etc.)?" What crap? Crap like, "A small mob was protesting a really bad video made in the USA outside the American Libyan Consulate and it turned ugly when the small mob lost control and took their weapons (everyone in Libya has weapons) and murdered our Ambassador and three others despite the heroic efforts of the Libyan security guards to fight the mob off. These brave Libyan security guards then carried the Ambassadors body to the hospital but it was too late." None other than Susan Rice, our esteemed leader in the United Nations was putting out that crap this weekend. Obviously she was auditioning for Hillary Clinton's servitude when Hillary retires soon to become the loving wife and mother AGAIN. Gosh the awful price she has paid to serve her country and the time it has taken from her family life provide the perfect example of those who dedicate their lives to Liberal Causes like destroying out nation.
The SAD TRUTH is many Americans agree with the Obama strategy to 'release or disconnect from our obligations, pledges, and entanglements' around the world. These completely fabricated stories do support these people's hopes and wishes (besides they will say all politicians lie when confronted with the facts). And trust me, if the facts on these murders ever come public no one will be able to defend the lies that are being spewed.
This posting isn't about the details of the latest Obama fiasco. It is about the BIG PICTURE. In other postings we have discussed Obama's driven commitment to diminish, if not to destroy, the USA culturally, economically, and internationally. How does he plan to accomplish this internationally in only 8 years? By DISENGAGEMENT. Many Americans are understandably weary. Who isn't weary of the mess Obama has made of our foreign affairs and world leadership?
What do the polling numbers say about likely voter's views regarding the Middle East? The numbers according to Rasmussen: "The majority (58%) of all voters continue to believe the United States should leave things alone in the Islamic world. Twenty-five percent (25%) disagree and think America should do more to encourage the growth of democracy in Islamic nations. Sixteen percent (16%) are not sure. This mirrors findings in surveys for the past 18 months as protests during the so-called 'Arab Spring' led to the overthrow of longtime dictators in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia."
The current Libyan mess also highlighted a debate about free speech in the US. Rasmussen polled this issue as well, " Voters overwhelmingly rate protecting freedom of speech more important than not offending other nations and cultures despite claims that the latest outbreak of anti-American violence in the Middle East is due to a YouTube video that mocks Islam. Seventy-two percent (72%) of Likely U.S. Voters believe it is more important for the United States to guarantee freedom of speech. Only 15% consider it more important for the United States to make sure that nothing is done to offend other nations and cultures. Thirteen percent(13%) are undecided."
And what about the constant messaging on mainstream media that Americans give Obama a 10-15 point lead in the polls over Romney regarding his ability to lead our foreign affairs? The truth, "Voters give a slight edge to President Obama over Mitt Romney – 48% to 45% - when asked who they trust more when it comes to handling events in the Middle East. But there’s a wide partisan difference of opinion on the question. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of Democrats have more confidence in the president, while 82% of Republicans and a plurality (47%) of voters not affiliated with either of the major parties express more faith in Romney. Forty-four percent (44%) of all voters give good or excellent marks to the way the Obama administration has responded to the situation in Libya where the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were murdered last week. Thirty-four percent (34%) rate the administration’s performance as poor. Again, predictably, while 74% of Democrats give the Obama administration positive marks for its handling of the Libya crisis, just 18% of GOP voters and 37% of unaffiliated agree." Predictably, 74% of the Dems were favorable? My gosh, our people are dead because of the way Obama has handled Libya!
What does this all mean? The fact that many Americans are tired of losing our precious young people in a part of the world that shows every sign of hating us and our way of life is very understandable. The question of whether Americans want to leave this part of the world alone or support Obama's Arab Spring movement to democracy (Muslim Brotherhood) gives voters a choice of two evils. This is exactly the choice we have if Obama is re-elected. I personally do not want one more single soldier to lose his or her life in support of Obama's DISENGAGEMENT STRATEGY. I SAY BRING THEM HOME TODAY IF OBAMA STAYS IN OFFICE!
Obama pulled out of Iraq on George Bush's announced schedule without insisting the US must have an influential role in insuring our efforts there were not wasted. Bush would have never pulled out under these conditions. Obama announced a surge in Afghanistan along with A DISENGAGEMENT DATE of December 31, 2014. This was an invitation to all Afghans to return to the control of the Taliban on January 1, 2015. Over 50 young soldiers have been murdered by "Afghan friendly terrorists" in the enforcement of Obama's strategy to hand security over the the Afghan's. It doesn't get any "stupider" than this. Obama's DISENGAGED leadership encouraging the terrorists movements in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and every other Middle East and Northern African nation has allowed Muslim Brotherhood control. Obama has DISENGAGED from every American ally in the Middle East by using an idiot pitch of calling them "Dictators who were suppressing their people. The majority of many of these nations are radical Muslims who are intent on killings all infidels. As stated before, they are a majority of wolves voting with sheep on what they will have for dinner. All Christians are sheep to these people.
And now Obama has DISENGAGED from Israel. He claims, "he has their backs" and will keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and yet he refuses to take any action to deter Iran. It is clear Obama plans to just get re-elected and wait it out (in many cases to DISENGAGE is just to wait it out) as Iran joins the new "Obama World". A world where, through his re-distribution plan, every nation has the same number of nuclear weapons. As he told us with the famous open mike, when he is re-elected, "he will have more flexibility". The flexibility he whispers is to disarm the US, to weaken any anti-missile shields, and to spread weapons to smaller nations around "Obama World".
The ironic truth is when the world is in economic turmoil and there are large evil forces wanting to destroy Christian and free world leaders Obama doesn't have to do much at all. The truth is Obama isn't capable of doing much at all. He can't fix anything. He can only break things. He can't engage in solutions. HE CAN, AND IS, DISENGAGING. When the only good and strong leader of the free world disengages, our young people always pay the price. Whether it is Pearl Harbor, Normandy, Viet Nam, or Libya, our precious young folks pay the price for appeasement and disengagement.
Every able-bodied, and able-minded, American must spread the word. No one can say, "We were not warned." No one can say, "We didn't realize things were that bad at the time." No one can say, "I just didn't want to get involved in politics or religion." We can't say it, because our grandchildren will not buy our excuses if Obama is elected to a second term.
This election is very "win able".
ARE YOU ENGAGED?
Jim
1. To release from something that holds fast, connects, or entangles. See Synonyms at extricate.
2. To release (oneself) from an engagement, pledge, or obligation.
v.intr.
To free or detach oneself; withdraw.
Time and again I hear real folks say, "Are we insane? Do people really believe the crap coming out of the Obama Administration and the mainstream press (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, NY Times, Washington Post, etc.)?" What crap? Crap like, "A small mob was protesting a really bad video made in the USA outside the American Libyan Consulate and it turned ugly when the small mob lost control and took their weapons (everyone in Libya has weapons) and murdered our Ambassador and three others despite the heroic efforts of the Libyan security guards to fight the mob off. These brave Libyan security guards then carried the Ambassadors body to the hospital but it was too late." None other than Susan Rice, our esteemed leader in the United Nations was putting out that crap this weekend. Obviously she was auditioning for Hillary Clinton's servitude when Hillary retires soon to become the loving wife and mother AGAIN. Gosh the awful price she has paid to serve her country and the time it has taken from her family life provide the perfect example of those who dedicate their lives to Liberal Causes like destroying out nation.
The SAD TRUTH is many Americans agree with the Obama strategy to 'release or disconnect from our obligations, pledges, and entanglements' around the world. These completely fabricated stories do support these people's hopes and wishes (besides they will say all politicians lie when confronted with the facts). And trust me, if the facts on these murders ever come public no one will be able to defend the lies that are being spewed.
This posting isn't about the details of the latest Obama fiasco. It is about the BIG PICTURE. In other postings we have discussed Obama's driven commitment to diminish, if not to destroy, the USA culturally, economically, and internationally. How does he plan to accomplish this internationally in only 8 years? By DISENGAGEMENT. Many Americans are understandably weary. Who isn't weary of the mess Obama has made of our foreign affairs and world leadership?
What do the polling numbers say about likely voter's views regarding the Middle East? The numbers according to Rasmussen: "The majority (58%) of all voters continue to believe the United States should leave things alone in the Islamic world. Twenty-five percent (25%) disagree and think America should do more to encourage the growth of democracy in Islamic nations. Sixteen percent (16%) are not sure. This mirrors findings in surveys for the past 18 months as protests during the so-called 'Arab Spring' led to the overthrow of longtime dictators in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia."
The current Libyan mess also highlighted a debate about free speech in the US. Rasmussen polled this issue as well, " Voters overwhelmingly rate protecting freedom of speech more important than not offending other nations and cultures despite claims that the latest outbreak of anti-American violence in the Middle East is due to a YouTube video that mocks Islam. Seventy-two percent (72%) of Likely U.S. Voters believe it is more important for the United States to guarantee freedom of speech. Only 15% consider it more important for the United States to make sure that nothing is done to offend other nations and cultures. Thirteen percent(13%) are undecided."
And what about the constant messaging on mainstream media that Americans give Obama a 10-15 point lead in the polls over Romney regarding his ability to lead our foreign affairs? The truth, "Voters give a slight edge to President Obama over Mitt Romney – 48% to 45% - when asked who they trust more when it comes to handling events in the Middle East. But there’s a wide partisan difference of opinion on the question. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of Democrats have more confidence in the president, while 82% of Republicans and a plurality (47%) of voters not affiliated with either of the major parties express more faith in Romney. Forty-four percent (44%) of all voters give good or excellent marks to the way the Obama administration has responded to the situation in Libya where the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were murdered last week. Thirty-four percent (34%) rate the administration’s performance as poor. Again, predictably, while 74% of Democrats give the Obama administration positive marks for its handling of the Libya crisis, just 18% of GOP voters and 37% of unaffiliated agree." Predictably, 74% of the Dems were favorable? My gosh, our people are dead because of the way Obama has handled Libya!
What does this all mean? The fact that many Americans are tired of losing our precious young people in a part of the world that shows every sign of hating us and our way of life is very understandable. The question of whether Americans want to leave this part of the world alone or support Obama's Arab Spring movement to democracy (Muslim Brotherhood) gives voters a choice of two evils. This is exactly the choice we have if Obama is re-elected. I personally do not want one more single soldier to lose his or her life in support of Obama's DISENGAGEMENT STRATEGY. I SAY BRING THEM HOME TODAY IF OBAMA STAYS IN OFFICE!
Obama pulled out of Iraq on George Bush's announced schedule without insisting the US must have an influential role in insuring our efforts there were not wasted. Bush would have never pulled out under these conditions. Obama announced a surge in Afghanistan along with A DISENGAGEMENT DATE of December 31, 2014. This was an invitation to all Afghans to return to the control of the Taliban on January 1, 2015. Over 50 young soldiers have been murdered by "Afghan friendly terrorists" in the enforcement of Obama's strategy to hand security over the the Afghan's. It doesn't get any "stupider" than this. Obama's DISENGAGED leadership encouraging the terrorists movements in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and every other Middle East and Northern African nation has allowed Muslim Brotherhood control. Obama has DISENGAGED from every American ally in the Middle East by using an idiot pitch of calling them "Dictators who were suppressing their people. The majority of many of these nations are radical Muslims who are intent on killings all infidels. As stated before, they are a majority of wolves voting with sheep on what they will have for dinner. All Christians are sheep to these people.
And now Obama has DISENGAGED from Israel. He claims, "he has their backs" and will keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and yet he refuses to take any action to deter Iran. It is clear Obama plans to just get re-elected and wait it out (in many cases to DISENGAGE is just to wait it out) as Iran joins the new "Obama World". A world where, through his re-distribution plan, every nation has the same number of nuclear weapons. As he told us with the famous open mike, when he is re-elected, "he will have more flexibility". The flexibility he whispers is to disarm the US, to weaken any anti-missile shields, and to spread weapons to smaller nations around "Obama World".
The ironic truth is when the world is in economic turmoil and there are large evil forces wanting to destroy Christian and free world leaders Obama doesn't have to do much at all. The truth is Obama isn't capable of doing much at all. He can't fix anything. He can only break things. He can't engage in solutions. HE CAN, AND IS, DISENGAGING. When the only good and strong leader of the free world disengages, our young people always pay the price. Whether it is Pearl Harbor, Normandy, Viet Nam, or Libya, our precious young folks pay the price for appeasement and disengagement.
Every able-bodied, and able-minded, American must spread the word. No one can say, "We were not warned." No one can say, "We didn't realize things were that bad at the time." No one can say, "I just didn't want to get involved in politics or religion." We can't say it, because our grandchildren will not buy our excuses if Obama is elected to a second term.
This election is very "win able".
ARE YOU ENGAGED?
Jim
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Obama and Hillary: Only In America
Obama and his press lackeys have no intentions of letting the 2012 911 CRISIS GO TO WASTE as they work to cover up their Middle East and Northern Africa policies. And besides, it takes the focus off Israel and Iran's nukes.
Today's Austin American Statesman has the following on their FRONT PAGE after explaining the wonderful things the Obama administration is doing to "avenge the killings":
"THE ROMNEY CAMPAIGN: Mitt Romney criticized Obama's handling of the killings in what Romney critics, including a few Republicans, called an unwarranted politicizing of an American foreign policy tragedy."
This was followed by an academic from the University of Texas, "As the investigation continues, there should be an unspoken agreement to restrain bipartisan interests. It is critical for Obama and others to not only condemn the attacks but also to stand united in support of Egypt as not to fuel new opposition to the US. Romney's criticism was ill timed."
I've Got it!!! So everything will be OK if we will just chill out and let Obama investigate and take prudent and patient action as appropriate. But above all, we should take no action that in anyway reflects on the Libyan nor Egyptian leadership. Leaders THAT OBAMA HAS PUT INTO POWER BY LEADING FROM BEHIND IN SUPPORT OF THE GLORIOUS ARAB SPRING!!! The world out there is complex and little snags like this happen, right?
None other than Benjamin Franklyn warned us over 200 years ago about the ARAB SPRING. Old Ben said, "Democracy is like two wolves and one lamb voting to determine what they will have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb protesting the vote." Friends, whether we like it or not dictators (people like Qaddafi and Mubarak) in the Middle East are the sheep and radical Islamists are the wolves. Obama's leadership from behind in the support of the Arab Spring and continued support of these murderers are leading the world to an Armageddon. AND OBAMA KNOWS IT. HE IS RIGHT ON SCHEDULE IN DIMINISHING THE US COLONIALISTS MILITARILY. It is his third objective behind destroying the US economy and culturally (remember?)
Every action so far by Obama and Clinton has been deceiving. Their goal clearly is to sweep these events under the political rug while defending the regimes in Egypt and Libya who they helped put into power. And if they can make Romney look poliical and "un-American", that is a bonus. To admit that they made mistakes in supporting militant Islamists before the November election would be a disaster. So how did they go about the deception. Look at their first statements regarding Libya while remembering OBAMA HAS YET TO MENTION EGYPT AT ALL.
Clinton came out first to test the water with these lies:
" American and Libyan security personnel battled the attackers together." Where are the details supporting this statement? If we need to "aim before we fire" in an investigation shouldn't we investigate just what kind of security forces were assigned to our ambassador by both the US and Libya? How and why make this claim so early?
"But we must be clear-eyed, even in our grief. This was an attack by a small and savage group – not the people or Government of Libya. Everywhere Chris and his team went in Libya, in a country scarred by war and tyranny, they were hailed as friends and partners. And when the attack came yesterday, Libyans stood and fought to defend our post. Some were wounded. Libyans carried Chris’ body to the hospital, and they helped rescue and lead other Americans to safety. And last night, when I spoke with the President of Libya, he strongly condemned the violence and pledged every effort to protect our people and pursue those responsible." Seems like Hillary has a clear grasp of exactly what happened doesn't she. Which of our 'friends and partners' formed this 'small and savage group'? My prediction is if the details of this incident ever become public we will find this is one of the biggest lies either of the Clinton's ever told. We already know this was a well planned attack by a military group. Some or estimating as many as 50 well trained forces. The paper quotes terrorists who were interviewed after the murders. Other stories give sketchy details about moving the American's to a 'safe house'. How many American and Libyan security forces were killed in the 2-4 hour battle?
"The friendship between our countries, borne out of shared struggle, will not be another casualty of this attack." No matter what the facts nor who failed to protect our people, it is important not to embarress Obama and Hillary.
" We are working closely with the Libyan authorities to move swiftly and surely. We are also working with partners around the world to safeguard other American embassies, consulates, and citizens." Hillary, let's double our efforts now that 911 has passed. And by the way, why are we now moving two warships off the coast? Are we going to attack this 'small and savage group's' navy?
"And as long as there are those who would take innocent life in the name of God, the world will never know a true and lasting peace." It is not God, Hillary, it is Allah.
And then you have Obama's remarks which came after Hillary conditioned the press and before he flew off t campaign in Las Vegas:
"Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts. Here is the big Obama straddle. The US still respects all Muslim faiths and apologizes for offending Muslims with videos made by fictitious Jewish Americans. And of course, then he throws in the lead from behind statement about us standing with the world. The 911 attacks were not attacks on the world. The only united effort of the world is in killing lambs and replacing them with Islamic wolves behind the "leadership from behind" of Obama.
"Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died." I am almost speechles with this crap about the bonds with these murderers. Every Libyan is guilty until proven innocent for not protecting our Ambassador and his people in their country. OBAMA AND THE LIBYAN GOVERNMENT ARE REPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR DIPLOMATS----PERIOD. THEY FAILED AND OUR PEOPLE DIED.
In closing do you remember Hillary's gloating and crackling laughter when she viewed the video of Qaddiffi's body after his death? Remember her statement, "We came, we saw, he died." This was a statement from an incompetent inexperienced light weight fool, who attained her position through a horrible marriage, to become the Secretary of State of the Unitied States of America. A fiction writer could not make this up. Not only is it unbelieveable, it is too frightening to imagine. Nor could a fiction writer team this loser with someone more incompetent carrying the title of President of the United States who is even less qualified. And yet the American voters put them in office. Now people around the world are in the early stages of suffering that will only get worse if the moochers put these people back in office in November.
We ain't seen nuthin yet.
Jim
.
Today's Austin American Statesman has the following on their FRONT PAGE after explaining the wonderful things the Obama administration is doing to "avenge the killings":
"THE ROMNEY CAMPAIGN: Mitt Romney criticized Obama's handling of the killings in what Romney critics, including a few Republicans, called an unwarranted politicizing of an American foreign policy tragedy."
This was followed by an academic from the University of Texas, "As the investigation continues, there should be an unspoken agreement to restrain bipartisan interests. It is critical for Obama and others to not only condemn the attacks but also to stand united in support of Egypt as not to fuel new opposition to the US. Romney's criticism was ill timed."
I've Got it!!! So everything will be OK if we will just chill out and let Obama investigate and take prudent and patient action as appropriate. But above all, we should take no action that in anyway reflects on the Libyan nor Egyptian leadership. Leaders THAT OBAMA HAS PUT INTO POWER BY LEADING FROM BEHIND IN SUPPORT OF THE GLORIOUS ARAB SPRING!!! The world out there is complex and little snags like this happen, right?
None other than Benjamin Franklyn warned us over 200 years ago about the ARAB SPRING. Old Ben said, "Democracy is like two wolves and one lamb voting to determine what they will have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb protesting the vote." Friends, whether we like it or not dictators (people like Qaddafi and Mubarak) in the Middle East are the sheep and radical Islamists are the wolves. Obama's leadership from behind in the support of the Arab Spring and continued support of these murderers are leading the world to an Armageddon. AND OBAMA KNOWS IT. HE IS RIGHT ON SCHEDULE IN DIMINISHING THE US COLONIALISTS MILITARILY. It is his third objective behind destroying the US economy and culturally (remember?)
Every action so far by Obama and Clinton has been deceiving. Their goal clearly is to sweep these events under the political rug while defending the regimes in Egypt and Libya who they helped put into power. And if they can make Romney look poliical and "un-American", that is a bonus. To admit that they made mistakes in supporting militant Islamists before the November election would be a disaster. So how did they go about the deception. Look at their first statements regarding Libya while remembering OBAMA HAS YET TO MENTION EGYPT AT ALL.
Clinton came out first to test the water with these lies:
" American and Libyan security personnel battled the attackers together." Where are the details supporting this statement? If we need to "aim before we fire" in an investigation shouldn't we investigate just what kind of security forces were assigned to our ambassador by both the US and Libya? How and why make this claim so early?
"But we must be clear-eyed, even in our grief. This was an attack by a small and savage group – not the people or Government of Libya. Everywhere Chris and his team went in Libya, in a country scarred by war and tyranny, they were hailed as friends and partners. And when the attack came yesterday, Libyans stood and fought to defend our post. Some were wounded. Libyans carried Chris’ body to the hospital, and they helped rescue and lead other Americans to safety. And last night, when I spoke with the President of Libya, he strongly condemned the violence and pledged every effort to protect our people and pursue those responsible." Seems like Hillary has a clear grasp of exactly what happened doesn't she. Which of our 'friends and partners' formed this 'small and savage group'? My prediction is if the details of this incident ever become public we will find this is one of the biggest lies either of the Clinton's ever told. We already know this was a well planned attack by a military group. Some or estimating as many as 50 well trained forces. The paper quotes terrorists who were interviewed after the murders. Other stories give sketchy details about moving the American's to a 'safe house'. How many American and Libyan security forces were killed in the 2-4 hour battle?
"The friendship between our countries, borne out of shared struggle, will not be another casualty of this attack." No matter what the facts nor who failed to protect our people, it is important not to embarress Obama and Hillary.
" We are working closely with the Libyan authorities to move swiftly and surely. We are also working with partners around the world to safeguard other American embassies, consulates, and citizens." Hillary, let's double our efforts now that 911 has passed. And by the way, why are we now moving two warships off the coast? Are we going to attack this 'small and savage group's' navy?
"And as long as there are those who would take innocent life in the name of God, the world will never know a true and lasting peace." It is not God, Hillary, it is Allah.
And then you have Obama's remarks which came after Hillary conditioned the press and before he flew off t campaign in Las Vegas:
"Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts. Here is the big Obama straddle. The US still respects all Muslim faiths and apologizes for offending Muslims with videos made by fictitious Jewish Americans. And of course, then he throws in the lead from behind statement about us standing with the world. The 911 attacks were not attacks on the world. The only united effort of the world is in killing lambs and replacing them with Islamic wolves behind the "leadership from behind" of Obama.
"Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died." I am almost speechles with this crap about the bonds with these murderers. Every Libyan is guilty until proven innocent for not protecting our Ambassador and his people in their country. OBAMA AND THE LIBYAN GOVERNMENT ARE REPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR DIPLOMATS----PERIOD. THEY FAILED AND OUR PEOPLE DIED.
In closing do you remember Hillary's gloating and crackling laughter when she viewed the video of Qaddiffi's body after his death? Remember her statement, "We came, we saw, he died." This was a statement from an incompetent inexperienced light weight fool, who attained her position through a horrible marriage, to become the Secretary of State of the Unitied States of America. A fiction writer could not make this up. Not only is it unbelieveable, it is too frightening to imagine. Nor could a fiction writer team this loser with someone more incompetent carrying the title of President of the United States who is even less qualified. And yet the American voters put them in office. Now people around the world are in the early stages of suffering that will only get worse if the moochers put these people back in office in November.
We ain't seen nuthin yet.
Jim
.
Sunday, September 9, 2012
The Commander in Chief is right on schedule?
Got a chance to catch up with Billy Roy Michum, unofficial semi-official chairman of the board of the one and only Hubbard City Cafe (a place where Ronald Reagan would have had coffee if he had been a serious coffee drinker of some renown). I had a question regarding the high marks the polls, and supposedly the public, give Obama in his leadership of foreign affairs and American security, "BM, how is Obama doing and should he be getting the high marks?"
"Jim, you seem to be the only guy asking this question. I think the President is right on schedule. He is leading from behind and pushing the free world right over the WWIII cliff. As anybody with a brain larger than an English pea knows, the skinny one aims to reduce our country to third world standards in three areas: economically, culturally (includes the God stuff), and in world affairs (our leadership of the free world). The truth is Obama has made more progress in diminishing us around the world than he has in the other two. I honestly think we can recover faster economically once we send him back to Kenya or Indonesia or California or Chicago or one of those places."
"That's pretty harsh stuff. How so, BM?"
"Just look at the progress he makes every week. This week the Congress told Obama and Hillary if they didn't put the Haqqani, so called militants, on the terrorist list the Congress would take action. This happened after many warnings to the administration, and this time they were given a deadline of next Monday. Hillary acted on last Thursday to put them on the list which means they have ten days to get their money out of US banks or we will freeze the funds (big deal). Obama and Hillary didn't want to take action because they wanted to negotiate with the Haqqani so Obama can pull American troops out by his 2014 committed date. Remember he surged and announced his surrender date at the same time. Well this weekend the Haqqani's tied a bomb to a 14 boy and killed 6 Afghan people including children near NATO headquarters."
"An Haqqani leader celebrated by announcing that he will launch 80-100 attacks on US troops because of Obama's action. And of course, these radical Muslims would like nothing better than to sit down with Hillary and negotiate being the way their treat their women. They would bitch slap her big time. And who is this group Obama wants to negotiate with? Here is what WIKIPEDIA says:
In late 2011, a 144-page book attributed to Sirajuddin Haqqani began circulating in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Described by Newsweek as a "manual for guerrillas and terrorists," the Pashto-language book details instructions on setting up a jihadi cell, receiving financing, recruiting and training. The manual advises recruits that parental permission is not necessary for jihad, that all debts should be paid before joining, and that suicide bombings and beheadings are allowed by Islam.
"Look we need to get our heads out of our rears. Obama wants to claim these are moderate Muslims like the Taliban that he can work with. Obama wants to pull out of Afghanistan, just like he did in Iraq, and leave it in the hands of his Muslim terrorist friends. This sounds like an overstatement but if you believe Obama really is an 'anti neocolonialist' you must also believe he has things in the Middle East right on schedule. Every time he takes credit for our peace in Iraq, I go crazy. He pulled out on George Bush's schedule and claims he did it alone. Of course, Bush would never have pulled out with out contingency plans and forces to insure our Iraq war was for nothing. Iraq is closer to the Iranians today then they are the free world."
This wasn't the only news regarding the Obama/Hillary teams progress in destroying the free world. Remember when skinny told the Russian, "I can be more flexible after the election." Well Hillary pledged this week that the US, "will soon lift Cold War-era trade sanctions on Russia." The same week Russia again rejected our calls for increased pressure on Syria and Iran. Obama claims 'his' sanctions are working. Could someone tell me how?"
"To net it out. The Obama plans to strength all US enemies and to weaken the free world is right on schedule. In the Middle East once Syria joins the Arab Spring and the Egyptian generals are overthrown our former allies are reduced to the Saudi's. Obama's re-election will insure their fall and of course Israel will be toast. And of course, Obama is working hard to disarm and reduce our military including our nuclear weaponry as Russia and China only grow stronger and more aggressive. China is pushing in the far east to 'settle' territorial disputes which means they will start claiming their rights to take over countries in that part of the world. Does anyone think Obama will push back?"
"The polls? Sadly many folks agree with Obama that the US deserves a 'come down'. Others are 'war weary' and just hope we can all get along. If we don't bother anyone maybe they will just leave us alone. Hitler, Pearl Harbor, and the Holocaust suggests that strategy hasn't worked for us so far."
Think about it,
Jim
"Jim, you seem to be the only guy asking this question. I think the President is right on schedule. He is leading from behind and pushing the free world right over the WWIII cliff. As anybody with a brain larger than an English pea knows, the skinny one aims to reduce our country to third world standards in three areas: economically, culturally (includes the God stuff), and in world affairs (our leadership of the free world). The truth is Obama has made more progress in diminishing us around the world than he has in the other two. I honestly think we can recover faster economically once we send him back to Kenya or Indonesia or California or Chicago or one of those places."
"That's pretty harsh stuff. How so, BM?"
"Just look at the progress he makes every week. This week the Congress told Obama and Hillary if they didn't put the Haqqani, so called militants, on the terrorist list the Congress would take action. This happened after many warnings to the administration, and this time they were given a deadline of next Monday. Hillary acted on last Thursday to put them on the list which means they have ten days to get their money out of US banks or we will freeze the funds (big deal). Obama and Hillary didn't want to take action because they wanted to negotiate with the Haqqani so Obama can pull American troops out by his 2014 committed date. Remember he surged and announced his surrender date at the same time. Well this weekend the Haqqani's tied a bomb to a 14 boy and killed 6 Afghan people including children near NATO headquarters."
"An Haqqani leader celebrated by announcing that he will launch 80-100 attacks on US troops because of Obama's action. And of course, these radical Muslims would like nothing better than to sit down with Hillary and negotiate being the way their treat their women. They would bitch slap her big time. And who is this group Obama wants to negotiate with? Here is what WIKIPEDIA says:
In late 2011, a 144-page book attributed to Sirajuddin Haqqani began circulating in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Described by Newsweek as a "manual for guerrillas and terrorists," the Pashto-language book details instructions on setting up a jihadi cell, receiving financing, recruiting and training. The manual advises recruits that parental permission is not necessary for jihad, that all debts should be paid before joining, and that suicide bombings and beheadings are allowed by Islam.
"Look we need to get our heads out of our rears. Obama wants to claim these are moderate Muslims like the Taliban that he can work with. Obama wants to pull out of Afghanistan, just like he did in Iraq, and leave it in the hands of his Muslim terrorist friends. This sounds like an overstatement but if you believe Obama really is an 'anti neocolonialist' you must also believe he has things in the Middle East right on schedule. Every time he takes credit for our peace in Iraq, I go crazy. He pulled out on George Bush's schedule and claims he did it alone. Of course, Bush would never have pulled out with out contingency plans and forces to insure our Iraq war was for nothing. Iraq is closer to the Iranians today then they are the free world."
This wasn't the only news regarding the Obama/Hillary teams progress in destroying the free world. Remember when skinny told the Russian, "I can be more flexible after the election." Well Hillary pledged this week that the US, "will soon lift Cold War-era trade sanctions on Russia." The same week Russia again rejected our calls for increased pressure on Syria and Iran. Obama claims 'his' sanctions are working. Could someone tell me how?"
"To net it out. The Obama plans to strength all US enemies and to weaken the free world is right on schedule. In the Middle East once Syria joins the Arab Spring and the Egyptian generals are overthrown our former allies are reduced to the Saudi's. Obama's re-election will insure their fall and of course Israel will be toast. And of course, Obama is working hard to disarm and reduce our military including our nuclear weaponry as Russia and China only grow stronger and more aggressive. China is pushing in the far east to 'settle' territorial disputes which means they will start claiming their rights to take over countries in that part of the world. Does anyone think Obama will push back?"
"The polls? Sadly many folks agree with Obama that the US deserves a 'come down'. Others are 'war weary' and just hope we can all get along. If we don't bother anyone maybe they will just leave us alone. Hitler, Pearl Harbor, and the Holocaust suggests that strategy hasn't worked for us so far."
Think about it,
Jim
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Bill Clinton: "Barack and I have never had sex with the American Economy!!"
When I was a CEO with high tech start up companies there were situations where we hired young, many times students, who we called "interns". It was well understood by all that these young people were to be treated as people who were not ready for the adult business world. They were there to get experience and to be treated as we would want others to treat our children, or now, grandchildren. At the time the President of the United States had other ideas about "interns". The American people witnessed the most despicable act ever committed by an American President (far beyond Richard Nixon's Watergate burglary). They then witnessed Clinton's cover up which included committing, and being impeached for, perjury (for those in Mt. Calm this is lying after swearing under oath to tell the truth in a legal American institution). Any objective person knew then our President was a complete sleaze bag who would go to any lengths to satisfy his appetites and cover up his misdeeds.
And today this same man is supposed to have over a 65% approval rating and is proclaimed to be one of the most successful Presidents in our history (usually mentioned with Ronald Reagan). Just as the MONICA BLUE DRESS REVEALED THE TRUTH let's take a look at this guy's record. Why? Because last night this same guy waved that same crooked finger at us and for 50 minutes said, "Barack and I have never had sex (screwed) the American economy. The Republicans did it before we got in office, and they will do it after we leave."
Let's take a look:
1. The great Bush collapse of the economy in 2008 was due primarily to subprime loans (home loans made to people who could not afford them). The roots of the subprime mortgage mess have Clinton's greasy finger prints all over them. Subprime mortgage activity grew an average 25% a year from 1994 (Clinton years were '92-'00) to 2003, outpacing the rate of growth for prime mortgages. The industry accounted for about $330 billion, or 9%, of U.S. mortgages in 2003, up from $35 billion a decade earlier.
Where did this come from? In 1994, the administration along with our old friends Barney Frank and Chris Dodd pushed through some fundamental changes to the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977. The goal of these changes was to make sure that banks were “serving low and moderate income geographies (Democrats)” and making sure that these banks “economically empowered persons of low and moderate income”. Regulators were then given more power to punish banks that did not comply with the new rules These changes led directly to the explosion of subprime mortgages and were the prime cause of the 2008 economic collapse. Clinton and Robert Rubin (Clinton's Wall Street thief) then allowed these financial institutions to package these bad loans and dump them on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and investors (who they enticed with high interest rates).
Today they blame this mess on the Republican's lack of REGULATION. IT WAS CAUSED BY THE DEMOCRAT'S REGULATIONS!!
George Bush? He accepted this mess, did nothing (as he is doing in the current Presidential race) and became a punching bag for the Libs. Note: A moral and honorable man like George should never follow a scoundrel like Bill.
2. Clinton used his Arkansas "arithmetic" to balance the budget and create what is now a "worshiped" surplus. The truth is Clinton failed miserably in his first two years trying to pass "Hillarycare". The Dems were voted out of House and Senate leadership in 1994 and Newt Gingrich came in to lead the the Republican Revolution. You know the rest. We cut spending and reformed welfare, etc. etc. And of course we then opened the door to the Dot-Com Bubble and to the excesses that were used to balance the budget.
George Bush? Focused singularly on the Middle East wars allowing Dems to spend, spend, spend in his later years. I personally think he may have made a deal. "I will allow your spending if you will allow me to fund my wars".
3. Bill Clinton, with his right arm from Goldman Sachs, Robert Rubin, was primarily responsible for fathering the Internet Boom which turned to Bust. Today a few of us still remember the "Internet or Dot-Com Bubble". It is a first cousin to the "Housing Bubble" which makes Sleazey Bill the King of Bubbles. I personally know this Bubble well from personal experience, both good and bad.
Clinton's first major scam was an historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1995–2000 (with a climax on March 10, 2000 (right before Bush's term), with the NASDAQ peaking at 5132.52 before closing at 5048.62) during which stock markets in industrialized nations saw their equity value rise rapidly from growth in the Internet sector and related fields and then drop like a lead balloon with investors holding the bag.
The period was marked by the founding (and, in many cases, spectacular failure) of a group of new Internet-based companies commonly referred to as dot-coms. Companies were seeing their stock prices shoot up if they simply added an "e-" prefix to their name and/or a ".com" to the end. A combination of rapidly increasing stock prices, market confidence that the companies would turn future profits, individual speculation in stocks, widely available venture capital, and crazy Wall Street Initial Public Offerings of overpriced stocks created an environment in which many investors were willing to overlook traditional metrics such as P/E ratio in favor of confidence in technological advancements.
Clinton and Rubin's buddies on Wall Street and in Venture Capital firms made billions of dollars before the bubble popped with many ordinary American investors holding the bag.
George Bush? He inherited this MESS. He passed the Bush tax cuts, fought off the 911 recession, and had 7 very good economic years leading up to the subprime recession.
4. Lastly, Clinton's balanced budget wasn't balanced at all in the way it is touted by the press. They claim he raised taxes on the rich when he actually lowered Capital Gains rates to inject capital into his Internet Bubble. Also, the Republicans held down government spending and consumers more than made up the difference in GDP. Clinton provided easy credit (remember subprimes again) and consumer savings went to historical lows (not good). Investor spending went up, and along with consumer spending, offset huge trade deficits FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. Remember Clinton opened trade with China. How do you think he gets those big speaking fees in the far east? So the Clinton/Gingrich balanced budget was very temporary based on a consumer and investor spending bubble which were over heated to offset the start of huge trade deficits with the Chinese.
George Bush? Again he inherited the mess and became a punching bag that no one, himself included, is brave enough today to provide a defense. What a shame for such an honorable man to cower after so much hard work.
Well maybe we can tell the story that George and his people should be telling.
Think about it,
Jim
And today this same man is supposed to have over a 65% approval rating and is proclaimed to be one of the most successful Presidents in our history (usually mentioned with Ronald Reagan). Just as the MONICA BLUE DRESS REVEALED THE TRUTH let's take a look at this guy's record. Why? Because last night this same guy waved that same crooked finger at us and for 50 minutes said, "Barack and I have never had sex (screwed) the American economy. The Republicans did it before we got in office, and they will do it after we leave."
Let's take a look:
1. The great Bush collapse of the economy in 2008 was due primarily to subprime loans (home loans made to people who could not afford them). The roots of the subprime mortgage mess have Clinton's greasy finger prints all over them. Subprime mortgage activity grew an average 25% a year from 1994 (Clinton years were '92-'00) to 2003, outpacing the rate of growth for prime mortgages. The industry accounted for about $330 billion, or 9%, of U.S. mortgages in 2003, up from $35 billion a decade earlier.
Where did this come from? In 1994, the administration along with our old friends Barney Frank and Chris Dodd pushed through some fundamental changes to the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977. The goal of these changes was to make sure that banks were “serving low and moderate income geographies (Democrats)” and making sure that these banks “economically empowered persons of low and moderate income”. Regulators were then given more power to punish banks that did not comply with the new rules These changes led directly to the explosion of subprime mortgages and were the prime cause of the 2008 economic collapse. Clinton and Robert Rubin (Clinton's Wall Street thief) then allowed these financial institutions to package these bad loans and dump them on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and investors (who they enticed with high interest rates).
Today they blame this mess on the Republican's lack of REGULATION. IT WAS CAUSED BY THE DEMOCRAT'S REGULATIONS!!
George Bush? He accepted this mess, did nothing (as he is doing in the current Presidential race) and became a punching bag for the Libs. Note: A moral and honorable man like George should never follow a scoundrel like Bill.
2. Clinton used his Arkansas "arithmetic" to balance the budget and create what is now a "worshiped" surplus. The truth is Clinton failed miserably in his first two years trying to pass "Hillarycare". The Dems were voted out of House and Senate leadership in 1994 and Newt Gingrich came in to lead the the Republican Revolution. You know the rest. We cut spending and reformed welfare, etc. etc. And of course we then opened the door to the Dot-Com Bubble and to the excesses that were used to balance the budget.
George Bush? Focused singularly on the Middle East wars allowing Dems to spend, spend, spend in his later years. I personally think he may have made a deal. "I will allow your spending if you will allow me to fund my wars".
3. Bill Clinton, with his right arm from Goldman Sachs, Robert Rubin, was primarily responsible for fathering the Internet Boom which turned to Bust. Today a few of us still remember the "Internet or Dot-Com Bubble". It is a first cousin to the "Housing Bubble" which makes Sleazey Bill the King of Bubbles. I personally know this Bubble well from personal experience, both good and bad.
Clinton's first major scam was an historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1995–2000 (with a climax on March 10, 2000 (right before Bush's term), with the NASDAQ peaking at 5132.52 before closing at 5048.62) during which stock markets in industrialized nations saw their equity value rise rapidly from growth in the Internet sector and related fields and then drop like a lead balloon with investors holding the bag.
The period was marked by the founding (and, in many cases, spectacular failure) of a group of new Internet-based companies commonly referred to as dot-coms. Companies were seeing their stock prices shoot up if they simply added an "e-" prefix to their name and/or a ".com" to the end. A combination of rapidly increasing stock prices, market confidence that the companies would turn future profits, individual speculation in stocks, widely available venture capital, and crazy Wall Street Initial Public Offerings of overpriced stocks created an environment in which many investors were willing to overlook traditional metrics such as P/E ratio in favor of confidence in technological advancements.
Clinton and Rubin's buddies on Wall Street and in Venture Capital firms made billions of dollars before the bubble popped with many ordinary American investors holding the bag.
George Bush? He inherited this MESS. He passed the Bush tax cuts, fought off the 911 recession, and had 7 very good economic years leading up to the subprime recession.
4. Lastly, Clinton's balanced budget wasn't balanced at all in the way it is touted by the press. They claim he raised taxes on the rich when he actually lowered Capital Gains rates to inject capital into his Internet Bubble. Also, the Republicans held down government spending and consumers more than made up the difference in GDP. Clinton provided easy credit (remember subprimes again) and consumer savings went to historical lows (not good). Investor spending went up, and along with consumer spending, offset huge trade deficits FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. Remember Clinton opened trade with China. How do you think he gets those big speaking fees in the far east? So the Clinton/Gingrich balanced budget was very temporary based on a consumer and investor spending bubble which were over heated to offset the start of huge trade deficits with the Chinese.
George Bush? Again he inherited the mess and became a punching bag that no one, himself included, is brave enough today to provide a defense. What a shame for such an honorable man to cower after so much hard work.
Well maybe we can tell the story that George and his people should be telling.
Think about it,
Jim
Friday, August 24, 2012
Incomes Decline
American incomes declined more in the three-year expansion that started in June 2009 than during the longest recession since the Great Depression, according an analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data by Sentier Research LLC.
Median household income fell 4.8 percent on an inflation-adjusted basis since the recession ended in June 2009, more than the 2.6 percent drop during the 18-month contraction, the research firm’s Gordon Green and John Coder wrote in a report today. Household income is 7.2 percent below the December 2007 level, the former Census Bureau economic statisticians wrote.
“Almost every group is worse off than it was three years ago, and some groups had very large declines in income,” Green, who previously directed work on the Census Bureau’s income and poverty statistics program, said in a phone interview today. “We’re in an unprecedented period of economic stagnation.”
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
The Romney Ryan Ticket
I couldn't wait to visit the Cafe to get their reaction to the selection of Paul Ryan after having been away on vacation (to Michigan which was great, and then to Lulu Land, California which was as expected) so I called Billy Roy to get a short briefing:
"Jim, I think Mitt's choice was pure Mitt, that being honest and courageous. Folks need to remember this guy isn't really a politician, thank God. He is a CEO, and a successful one at that. Mitt picked the best man to join his team and to replace him if needed just like a great CEO would do. Politics be damned. Here were his choices as I saw them.
He could have gone politically cautious:
A: Select a candidate that would improved his chances of gaining swing states. Portman of Ohio would be one. Rubio of Florida, another.
B: Stay general, some say vague, in the specifics of his plans for tax, Medicare and Social Security reform. Same with his plans to reduce the size and regulatory power of government, and protect military spending. This makes a smaller target for Obama to demagogue and keeps the focus on Obama's record. This is what the typical DC consultant would have advised.
C. Hopefully win the Presidency in a squeaker, win the Senate and House, and engage the Democrats hoping to save the nation from economic disaster.
Or he could go bold:
A: Select a candidate, Paul Ryan, who will not only present the specifics of economic plans to save the nation from economic collapse but will indeed make those specifics the deciding factor in the November election. This is an "all in" move.
B: Bet the election on Mitt's belief that you can tell the truth to voters in 7-8 swing states about reform in a way they are willing to not only accept, but support in the voting booth. Take advantage of Ryan's brilliant mind and that great smile.
C: Win the Presidency, House, and Senate along with the support of a majority of voters who have endorsed the specifics of a bold plan to reform government returning it to a constitutionally driven free economy. In other words go for a mandate not just on your team but on your policies as well."
"Jim you were once a CEO. You know that unless you have the support of your people you don't want the job. Right? We cowboys love the way Romney has saddled up to take Obama and the idiot Biden head on with the issues that really matter. After all, any intelligent person knows we are headed for economic disaster unless we change leadership."
Well, I felt better after talking with Billy Roy. I felt even better after hearing Romney take on Obama's Chicago style campaigning tactics. Instead of responding specifically to the lies and distortions, he went after the tactics. Romney used terms like gutter. He said Obama was beneath the decency of the office of the President. He basically called Obama and his people liars while explaining why they had to stoop to such tactics, that being they couldn't run on their record. Romney's alternative could be to counter each lie and distortion by attempting to correct these falsehoods which would put him on the defensive. And remember the press isn't going to seek the truth. Instead Romney is exposing the Chicago thugs for what they are and not honoring their trash by refuting it. Smart!!
In summing up, both Romney and Ryan come from the Jack Kemp and Ronald Reagan schools of economics. They know the only way to get out of this economic mess is to GROW. While reductions are needed, only cutting government spending will not fix the problem. Currently our expenses exceed our revenues at the federal level by about $1 trillion dollars with revenues in the $2.5 trillion neighborhood and spending in the $3.5 trillion range. That $3.5 trillion is broken down about 1/3 defense and other expenses, 1/3 social security/medicare/medicaid, and the last 1/3 (frighteningly) interest on our debt. Our country's gross domestic product is growing at an anemic 1-1.8% and will go negative if we continue with our current administration's plans. WE NEED TO GROW OUR ECONOMY AT LEAST AT A 4% ANNUAL RATE. And it can be done. We just need to reform our tax code to provide incentives for businesses to invest while removing burdensome regulations from our private sector. Eliminating the threats that Barrack Hussein Obama brings to all business people would unleash a growth spurt like we have never seen.
No one understands this better than the Romney/Ryan team.
Mitt, you done good. Go get the SOBs.
Jim
"Jim, I think Mitt's choice was pure Mitt, that being honest and courageous. Folks need to remember this guy isn't really a politician, thank God. He is a CEO, and a successful one at that. Mitt picked the best man to join his team and to replace him if needed just like a great CEO would do. Politics be damned. Here were his choices as I saw them.
He could have gone politically cautious:
A: Select a candidate that would improved his chances of gaining swing states. Portman of Ohio would be one. Rubio of Florida, another.
B: Stay general, some say vague, in the specifics of his plans for tax, Medicare and Social Security reform. Same with his plans to reduce the size and regulatory power of government, and protect military spending. This makes a smaller target for Obama to demagogue and keeps the focus on Obama's record. This is what the typical DC consultant would have advised.
C. Hopefully win the Presidency in a squeaker, win the Senate and House, and engage the Democrats hoping to save the nation from economic disaster.
Or he could go bold:
A: Select a candidate, Paul Ryan, who will not only present the specifics of economic plans to save the nation from economic collapse but will indeed make those specifics the deciding factor in the November election. This is an "all in" move.
B: Bet the election on Mitt's belief that you can tell the truth to voters in 7-8 swing states about reform in a way they are willing to not only accept, but support in the voting booth. Take advantage of Ryan's brilliant mind and that great smile.
C: Win the Presidency, House, and Senate along with the support of a majority of voters who have endorsed the specifics of a bold plan to reform government returning it to a constitutionally driven free economy. In other words go for a mandate not just on your team but on your policies as well."
"Jim you were once a CEO. You know that unless you have the support of your people you don't want the job. Right? We cowboys love the way Romney has saddled up to take Obama and the idiot Biden head on with the issues that really matter. After all, any intelligent person knows we are headed for economic disaster unless we change leadership."
Well, I felt better after talking with Billy Roy. I felt even better after hearing Romney take on Obama's Chicago style campaigning tactics. Instead of responding specifically to the lies and distortions, he went after the tactics. Romney used terms like gutter. He said Obama was beneath the decency of the office of the President. He basically called Obama and his people liars while explaining why they had to stoop to such tactics, that being they couldn't run on their record. Romney's alternative could be to counter each lie and distortion by attempting to correct these falsehoods which would put him on the defensive. And remember the press isn't going to seek the truth. Instead Romney is exposing the Chicago thugs for what they are and not honoring their trash by refuting it. Smart!!
In summing up, both Romney and Ryan come from the Jack Kemp and Ronald Reagan schools of economics. They know the only way to get out of this economic mess is to GROW. While reductions are needed, only cutting government spending will not fix the problem. Currently our expenses exceed our revenues at the federal level by about $1 trillion dollars with revenues in the $2.5 trillion neighborhood and spending in the $3.5 trillion range. That $3.5 trillion is broken down about 1/3 defense and other expenses, 1/3 social security/medicare/medicaid, and the last 1/3 (frighteningly) interest on our debt. Our country's gross domestic product is growing at an anemic 1-1.8% and will go negative if we continue with our current administration's plans. WE NEED TO GROW OUR ECONOMY AT LEAST AT A 4% ANNUAL RATE. And it can be done. We just need to reform our tax code to provide incentives for businesses to invest while removing burdensome regulations from our private sector. Eliminating the threats that Barrack Hussein Obama brings to all business people would unleash a growth spurt like we have never seen.
No one understands this better than the Romney/Ryan team.
Mitt, you done good. Go get the SOBs.
Jim
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Obamacare Will Be the Least of our Worries
Dropped by the Cafe this weekend to check in. I thought the folks had been in shock since John Roberts double crossed his country. The first response to my question regarding how Billy Roy Michum felt about our Obamacare concerns startled me to say the least.
"Obamacare is a meaningless issue. It don't mean nuthin. IF ROMNEY IS ELECTED OBAMACARE IS TOAST. IF OBAMA IS RE-ELECTED, THEN OBAMACARE IS THE LEAST OF OUR WORRIES."
"How do you figure that, BM?"
"If Obama is re-elected he has our so called Republican form of government rigged. His reformation to socialism (and worse) can't be stopped," he responded like a cowboy whose favorite horse had just gone to the golden corral.
I responded hopefull, "But we could still hold the house and take over the senate. I'm not going to even mention the supreme court as a backstop. The courts are done when it comes to protecting the constitutional rights of citizens and religious organizations. They are powerless to make Obama enforce marriage, immigration, drilling, welfare, gun laws, or anthing else he doesn't want to enforce. I've got that figured out. But what about the legislature? Can't they at least make deadlocks work?"
"Obama, Reid, and Pelosi have passed legislation in his first term that has transferred virtually unlimited power to the executive branch. For example they passed a 2,700 page Obamacare bill with 2,500 references to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. There are more than 700 instances when he or she is instructed that they 'shall' do something and more than 200 times when they take at their sole discretion some form of regulatory action. On 139 occasions, the law mentions that the 'Secretary determines'. In essence one person, appointed by and reporting to the president, will be in charge of the health care of 310 million Americans once ObamaCare is fully operational in 2014."
"And again, that is he least of our worries. The same is true in the 2,319 pages of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act which gives nearly unlimited power to various agencies to control the nation's financial, banking and investment sectors. The bill also creates new agencies, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, not subject to any oversight by Congress. This overall process was repeated numerous times with other legislation all with the intent of granting unlimited power to the executive branch controlled by Barack Obama and those who are pulling the puppet's strings."
"The Environmental Protection Agency on a near daily basis issues new regulations clearly out to modify and change environmental laws previously passed and to impose a radical green agenda never approved by Congress. The same is true of the Energy and Interior Departments among many others. And think of the power Obama has given his socialist 'czars' who have huge resources and no legislative oversight."
"None of these extra-constitutional actions have been challenged by Congress. The socialists know it is nearly impossible to reverse these actions unless stopped in its early stages. They know after the election the Republicans still won't have a majority that can override presidential vetoes. All the Dems need is 145 house seats and 34 senate seats."
"Congress does have control of the purse-strings as all spending must be approved by them. However, once re-elected, Barack Obama, can play the government shut down chicken game and threaten the Republicans into surrendering."
"And, Jim, I am afraid you are right about the courts Obama has already ignored various court orders, e.g. the Gulf of Mexico oil drilling moratorium, as well as stonewalling subpoenas and requests issued by Congress. The Eric Holder Justice Department has become the epitome of corruption as part of the most dishonest and deceitful administration in American history. Think what an Obama who doesn't care about re-election will do. And of course, Obama will have an opportunity to load the supreme court even more to his favor with appointments in the second term."
"Our founders never thought the American people would elect a communist to the office of the president. Neither did they think the congress would ever surrender their constitutional duties to a crooked, lying narcissist in the White House. And when the liar-in-chief doesn't obey court rulings, it makes the judicial branch irrelevant."
"Our commander-in-chief, (joke) is supporting our withdrawal from the radical muslim middle east which is sworn to our destruction while supporting the muslim brotherhood/al-queda takeover the whole region. He is letting Iran become a nuclear supplier of weapons to these crazies. He hates Israel. The press praises his surrendering of American leadership in the world as Obama forfeits our hard earned gains in Iraq and Afghanistan. And the polls voters prefer Obama over Romney in managing foreign affairs eventhough our poor military people and veterens clearly support Romney. Just like everything else, the moochers perfer Obama, and producers, Romney."
"In summary, if elected, Obama can move to phase two in destroying this country for good. Our military will be toast. Our individual rights gone. Our religious freedom destroyed. Our economy will be at a third world country level. AND HE WILL DO IT ALL, ON PURPOSE."
"BM, it looks like to me the bus is approaching the last stop. The American people have one last chance to get off. I think we will take it. Mitt Romney will get 54% of the popular vote and will squeak into the White House with a slim majority of the electoral vote. While I am happy about that it is scary that if will be that close. Meanwhile, at every level of society we have to find a way to recapture the American dream and do some major rebuilding of our culture."
Think about it,
Jim
"Obamacare is a meaningless issue. It don't mean nuthin. IF ROMNEY IS ELECTED OBAMACARE IS TOAST. IF OBAMA IS RE-ELECTED, THEN OBAMACARE IS THE LEAST OF OUR WORRIES."
"How do you figure that, BM?"
"If Obama is re-elected he has our so called Republican form of government rigged. His reformation to socialism (and worse) can't be stopped," he responded like a cowboy whose favorite horse had just gone to the golden corral.
I responded hopefull, "But we could still hold the house and take over the senate. I'm not going to even mention the supreme court as a backstop. The courts are done when it comes to protecting the constitutional rights of citizens and religious organizations. They are powerless to make Obama enforce marriage, immigration, drilling, welfare, gun laws, or anthing else he doesn't want to enforce. I've got that figured out. But what about the legislature? Can't they at least make deadlocks work?"
"Obama, Reid, and Pelosi have passed legislation in his first term that has transferred virtually unlimited power to the executive branch. For example they passed a 2,700 page Obamacare bill with 2,500 references to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. There are more than 700 instances when he or she is instructed that they 'shall' do something and more than 200 times when they take at their sole discretion some form of regulatory action. On 139 occasions, the law mentions that the 'Secretary determines'. In essence one person, appointed by and reporting to the president, will be in charge of the health care of 310 million Americans once ObamaCare is fully operational in 2014."
"And again, that is he least of our worries. The same is true in the 2,319 pages of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act which gives nearly unlimited power to various agencies to control the nation's financial, banking and investment sectors. The bill also creates new agencies, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, not subject to any oversight by Congress. This overall process was repeated numerous times with other legislation all with the intent of granting unlimited power to the executive branch controlled by Barack Obama and those who are pulling the puppet's strings."
"The Environmental Protection Agency on a near daily basis issues new regulations clearly out to modify and change environmental laws previously passed and to impose a radical green agenda never approved by Congress. The same is true of the Energy and Interior Departments among many others. And think of the power Obama has given his socialist 'czars' who have huge resources and no legislative oversight."
"None of these extra-constitutional actions have been challenged by Congress. The socialists know it is nearly impossible to reverse these actions unless stopped in its early stages. They know after the election the Republicans still won't have a majority that can override presidential vetoes. All the Dems need is 145 house seats and 34 senate seats."
"Congress does have control of the purse-strings as all spending must be approved by them. However, once re-elected, Barack Obama, can play the government shut down chicken game and threaten the Republicans into surrendering."
"And, Jim, I am afraid you are right about the courts Obama has already ignored various court orders, e.g. the Gulf of Mexico oil drilling moratorium, as well as stonewalling subpoenas and requests issued by Congress. The Eric Holder Justice Department has become the epitome of corruption as part of the most dishonest and deceitful administration in American history. Think what an Obama who doesn't care about re-election will do. And of course, Obama will have an opportunity to load the supreme court even more to his favor with appointments in the second term."
"Our founders never thought the American people would elect a communist to the office of the president. Neither did they think the congress would ever surrender their constitutional duties to a crooked, lying narcissist in the White House. And when the liar-in-chief doesn't obey court rulings, it makes the judicial branch irrelevant."
"Our commander-in-chief, (joke) is supporting our withdrawal from the radical muslim middle east which is sworn to our destruction while supporting the muslim brotherhood/al-queda takeover the whole region. He is letting Iran become a nuclear supplier of weapons to these crazies. He hates Israel. The press praises his surrendering of American leadership in the world as Obama forfeits our hard earned gains in Iraq and Afghanistan. And the polls voters prefer Obama over Romney in managing foreign affairs eventhough our poor military people and veterens clearly support Romney. Just like everything else, the moochers perfer Obama, and producers, Romney."
"In summary, if elected, Obama can move to phase two in destroying this country for good. Our military will be toast. Our individual rights gone. Our religious freedom destroyed. Our economy will be at a third world country level. AND HE WILL DO IT ALL, ON PURPOSE."
"BM, it looks like to me the bus is approaching the last stop. The American people have one last chance to get off. I think we will take it. Mitt Romney will get 54% of the popular vote and will squeak into the White House with a slim majority of the electoral vote. While I am happy about that it is scary that if will be that close. Meanwhile, at every level of society we have to find a way to recapture the American dream and do some major rebuilding of our culture."
Think about it,
Jim
Friday, July 13, 2012
Lincoln Didn't Finish the Job: 93% of Blacks Are Enslaved in the Year 2012
Warning: This posting is not politically correct!!! But enough is enough. It is time to call names and tell the truth.
Slavery is alive but not well in America today. It is North to South and East to West, nationwide.
Today's PLANTATION OWNERS are DEMOCRATS. The MASTERS are people like Obama, Biden, Pelosi, and Reid. The HOUSE NIGGERS are execs and their paid agents in organizations like the NAACP, CORE, and the URBAN LEAGUE. The HOUSE NIGGERS are paid to keep the slaves in their place.
Today's SLAVE MASTERS have bought their slaves with an idiot pitch that says you have RIGHTS to all basic human needs: food stamps, government provided housing, welfare checks (particularly if you are unwed), health care, transportation, free education, and more. The slaves are told, "This is just like you had it back in the day with one big difference, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO WORK like you did on the plantations. The Federal Government is a more caring provider than those awful Southern Redneck Plantation Owners. In fact, the less you work, the more RIGHTS you can collect on. Ain't that sweet."
They go on, "And what do you have to do get these RIGHTS? Just VOTE Democratic. We Democrats will give you money we collect from WORKING PEOPLE (A.K.A. producers) just for pulling the lever with the big "D" on it. We will even have our lackeys pick you up and drive you to the voting polls. If you are not registered, that is OK. We can fix it. We will even have Black Panthers stand outside the polling booths with clubs to remind you that you need to pull the "D" lever instead of the "R" lever just in case you might forget. Full service, huh?:"
So why is it time to name names and tell the truth? Because it is clear that the people who are suffering the most are BLACKS. They will continue to suffer and sink lower in degradation until they are honestly FREED. The fact is that after decades of Democratic Slavery, 72% of black births are to unmarried women; blacks, with 12.6% of the nation's population, account for 50% of murder victims; and a young black male is likelier to be killed on the streets of Chicago (home of Barack Hussein Obama and thugs ;ole Rahm Israel Emanuel, Valerie Jarret, and the Daley Boys) than in the hills of Afghanistan. Yep, Black Soldiers are safer in war than in the slums ofChicago
Mitt Romney spoke to the NAACP this week. The GOP candidate showed the content of his character at the convention by not pandering to blacks beset by illegitimacy, poverty, crime and joblessness — and an indifferent president named Obama stayed away. For refusing to pander to black voters in his speech, Mitt Romney was accused by MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell of pandering to his white base.
The speech, O'Donnell insisted, was part of a GOP "Southern strategy" used to appeal to "racial and racist voting." Over at the Daily Beast, Michael Tomasky came unhinged, contending that Romney's attempt to describe the plight of black Americans under President Obama's hope and change, and offering real solutions to fixing the government that oppresses them, made him "a spineless, disingenuous, supercilious, race-mongering pyromaniac."
Romney knew he'd be booed when he said he'd get rid of ObamaCare, the job- and growth-killing mess that is the newest "freebie" of the cradle-to-grave nanny state on which many Blacks have become increasingly dependent. He noted that black students account for 17% of students nationwide, with 42% of those trapped in failing schools. He spoke of "neighborhoods filled with violence and fear (and) empty of opportunity." And on a matter that separates most black church leaders from Obama, he pledged to defend traditional marriage as the president embraces the gay version. Romney's speech didn't pander to anybody.
"The president will say he will do things to improve your plight, but he will not, he cannot, and his record of the last four years proves it," Romney told the dubious crowd, adding: "If you want a president who will make things better in the African American community, you're looking at him."
And then one of the slave masters spoke the day after. VP Biden came with one central message: If Romney is elected many Blacks would have their voting rights taken away. Curious that Biden, a Slave Master, speaking to a room full of House Niggers spoke mostly of voting rights. Why? Because votes are what the Slave Masters demand to keep the freebies coming from the tax payers to the moochers.
If anyone that reads this posting has access to any of Romney's people I urge you to get this suggestion to Romney. It is time to take the gloves off, forget political correctness, and speak the truth. Governor Romney needs to warn HISPANICS of the path many of them are following. If they sell their votes to the Democrats in return for Immigration Amnesty and for the lawbreaking Democrat's consent to not enforce Immigration Laws they will start down the path of HISPANIC SLAVERY. The next step is clear. Hispanics will ask why should we do these dirty jobs when we can get all the freebies that Blacks get WITHOUT WORKING? Fair is fair. Their acceptance of trading votes for freebies then leads to the destruction of families, lawless children, drugs and drug dealers, school drop outs, a loss of religious freedom in supporting gay marriage and abortions, and more. In just a few short years they can help destroy the dreams of Americans as they join the plight of Blacks. The Democrats will welcome them with open arms. After all, it is only fair.
Don't just think about this. We have to find a way to get it to Romney.
It is worth being called a RACIST if it results in saving the greatest country on earth.
I was called one just two weeks ago and it didn't hurt at all.
Jim
Slavery is alive but not well in America today. It is North to South and East to West, nationwide.
Today's PLANTATION OWNERS are DEMOCRATS. The MASTERS are people like Obama, Biden, Pelosi, and Reid. The HOUSE NIGGERS are execs and their paid agents in organizations like the NAACP, CORE, and the URBAN LEAGUE. The HOUSE NIGGERS are paid to keep the slaves in their place.
Today's SLAVE MASTERS have bought their slaves with an idiot pitch that says you have RIGHTS to all basic human needs: food stamps, government provided housing, welfare checks (particularly if you are unwed), health care, transportation, free education, and more. The slaves are told, "This is just like you had it back in the day with one big difference, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO WORK like you did on the plantations. The Federal Government is a more caring provider than those awful Southern Redneck Plantation Owners. In fact, the less you work, the more RIGHTS you can collect on. Ain't that sweet."
They go on, "And what do you have to do get these RIGHTS? Just VOTE Democratic. We Democrats will give you money we collect from WORKING PEOPLE (A.K.A. producers) just for pulling the lever with the big "D" on it. We will even have our lackeys pick you up and drive you to the voting polls. If you are not registered, that is OK. We can fix it. We will even have Black Panthers stand outside the polling booths with clubs to remind you that you need to pull the "D" lever instead of the "R" lever just in case you might forget. Full service, huh?:"
So why is it time to name names and tell the truth? Because it is clear that the people who are suffering the most are BLACKS. They will continue to suffer and sink lower in degradation until they are honestly FREED. The fact is that after decades of Democratic Slavery, 72% of black births are to unmarried women; blacks, with 12.6% of the nation's population, account for 50% of murder victims; and a young black male is likelier to be killed on the streets of Chicago (home of Barack Hussein Obama and thugs ;ole Rahm Israel Emanuel, Valerie Jarret, and the Daley Boys) than in the hills of Afghanistan. Yep, Black Soldiers are safer in war than in the slums of
Mitt Romney spoke to the NAACP this week. The GOP candidate showed the content of his character at the convention by not pandering to blacks beset by illegitimacy, poverty, crime and joblessness — and an indifferent president named Obama stayed away. For refusing to pander to black voters in his speech, Mitt Romney was accused by MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell of pandering to his white base.
The speech, O'Donnell insisted, was part of a GOP "Southern strategy" used to appeal to "racial and racist voting." Over at the Daily Beast, Michael Tomasky came unhinged, contending that Romney's attempt to describe the plight of black Americans under President Obama's hope and change, and offering real solutions to fixing the government that oppresses them, made him "a spineless, disingenuous, supercilious, race-mongering pyromaniac."
Romney knew he'd be booed when he said he'd get rid of ObamaCare, the job- and growth-killing mess that is the newest "freebie" of the cradle-to-grave nanny state on which many Blacks have become increasingly dependent. He noted that black students account for 17% of students nationwide, with 42% of those trapped in failing schools. He spoke of "neighborhoods filled with violence and fear (and) empty of opportunity." And on a matter that separates most black church leaders from Obama, he pledged to defend traditional marriage as the president embraces the gay version. Romney's speech didn't pander to anybody.
"The president will say he will do things to improve your plight, but he will not, he cannot, and his record of the last four years proves it," Romney told the dubious crowd, adding: "If you want a president who will make things better in the African American community, you're looking at him."
And then one of the slave masters spoke the day after. VP Biden came with one central message: If Romney is elected many Blacks would have their voting rights taken away. Curious that Biden, a Slave Master, speaking to a room full of House Niggers spoke mostly of voting rights. Why? Because votes are what the Slave Masters demand to keep the freebies coming from the tax payers to the moochers.
If anyone that reads this posting has access to any of Romney's people I urge you to get this suggestion to Romney. It is time to take the gloves off, forget political correctness, and speak the truth. Governor Romney needs to warn HISPANICS of the path many of them are following. If they sell their votes to the Democrats in return for Immigration Amnesty and for the lawbreaking Democrat's consent to not enforce Immigration Laws they will start down the path of HISPANIC SLAVERY. The next step is clear. Hispanics will ask why should we do these dirty jobs when we can get all the freebies that Blacks get WITHOUT WORKING? Fair is fair. Their acceptance of trading votes for freebies then leads to the destruction of families, lawless children, drugs and drug dealers, school drop outs, a loss of religious freedom in supporting gay marriage and abortions, and more. In just a few short years they can help destroy the dreams of Americans as they join the plight of Blacks. The Democrats will welcome them with open arms. After all, it is only fair.
Don't just think about this. We have to find a way to get it to Romney.
It is worth being called a RACIST if it results in saving the greatest country on earth.
I was called one just two weeks ago and it didn't hurt at all.
Jim
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
